Tunable Surface Nanotopography with Disordered Hyperuniformity in Poly(ethylenimine)/Alginate-Based Multilayered Films
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM) films with controllable surface morphology, formed by layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly, are widely used in energy, water, sensors, electronics, and biomedical applications. Self-wrinkling behavior could give rise to diverse micro- or nanoscale patterns in these PEM films in response to various stimuli, thereby enabling the desired functionalities. Disordered hyperuniformity (DHU) is a recently discovered exotic state of matter that demonstrates disorder on a local scale but uniformity in long-range order. It has been found that the DHU states of solid 2D materials and high-entropy alloys often possess significantly lower energy than other disorder models and can lead to unique electronic and thermal transport properties. Nevertheless, a surface with DHU-like nanostructures in PEM films has never been reported before. Herein, we present a straightforward method for generating DHU-like nanotopographic patterns in PEM films. Using polyelectrolyte solutions of branched poly(ethylenimine) (BPEI) and alginate (ALG), the resultant LbL films showed tunable nanodot and nanopore-like topographies on the surface, depending on the pH of the solutions and the number of layers. The experimental results demonstrated that the pH of the terminal solution during the LbL process played a dominant role in determining the nanostructures of the final film, which is due to the different degrees of ionization of polyelectrolyte chains under different pH environments. Notably, the nanostructures with DHU-like characteristics were observed on the film surface within a narrow pH range for BPEI and ALG. Benefiting from the DHU “phase diagram” based on the autocovariance function analysis, the nanofilms with specific surface characteristics and desired functionalities can be created. Moreover, the nano- or microfeatures on the surface could be retained by introducing SiO 2 nanoparticles into the PEM matrix, indicating the possibility of manufacturing functional nanocomposite-incorporated films.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, 807 Canton Avenue, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States
Southern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 1100 Allen Toussaint Blvd., New Orleans, Louisiana 70124, United States
Materials Science and Engineering Program, School for Engineering and Matter, Transport and Energy
Arizona State University
Funding
Army Research Office · Texas Tech University
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10141710.1016/j.surfin.2021.101417 ↗
2. 10.1021/am504348x10.1021/am504348x ↗
3. 10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00637-910.1016/S0924-4247(01)00637-9 ↗
4. 10.1002/app.3488010.1002/app.34880 ↗
5. 10.1021/ma991073+10.1021/ma991073+ ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.5b1022210.1021/acsami.5b10222 ↗
7. 10.1002/ppap.20090016210.1002/ppap.200900162 ↗
8. 10.1002/admi.20180124710.1002/admi.201801247 ↗
9. 10.1021/ma961096d10.1021/ma961096d ↗
10. Taketa, T. B.; Beppu, M. M. in Materials Science Forum . 1226–1231 Trans Tech Publications.
11. 10.1163/016942410X51104210.1163/016942410X511042 ↗
12. 10.3390/surfaces202002610.3390/surfaces2020026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.sna.2005.12.00510.1016/j.sna.2005.12.005 ↗
14. 10.1021/cr800208y10.1021/cr800208y ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.4c0608210.1021/acsami.4c06082 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14233310.1016/j.cej.2023.142333 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20190445310.1002/adfm.201904453 ↗
18. 10.3390/s2118616410.3390/s21186164 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.04210.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.042 ↗
20. 10.1002/smll.20110093410.1002/smll.201100934 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00361-210.1016/S0142-9612(03)00361-2 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0332610.1021/acsnano.9b03326 ↗
23. 10.1021/la803479a10.1021/la803479a ↗
24. 10.1007/s13233-020-8158-110.1007/s13233-020-8158-1 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.00410.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.004 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.5b1187810.1021/jacs.5b11878 ↗
27. 10.1038/nmat71910.1038/nmat719 ↗
28. 10.1021/la000075g10.1021/la000075g ↗
29. 10.1021/la010261210.1021/la0102612 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.04111310.1103/PhysRevE.68.041113 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.03.00110.1016/j.physrep.2018.03.001 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.17800110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.178001 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.04130910.1103/PhysRevE.84.041309 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevE.98.06310110.1103/PhysRevE.98.063101 ↗
35. 10.1126/sciadv.aba082610.1126/sciadv.aba0826 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.201686211810.1073/pnas.2016862118 ↗
37. 10.1063/5.013718710.1063/5.0137187 ↗
38. 10.1073/pnas.090774410610.1073/pnas.0907744106 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41578-020-00263-y10.1038/s41578-020-00263-y ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.04330110.1103/PhysRevE.96.043301 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.23542710.1103/PhysRevB.106.235427 ↗
42. 10.1126/sciadv.aba082610.1126/sciadv.aba0826 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11867810.1016/j.actamat.2023.118678 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.22410210.1103/PhysRevB.103.224102 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.24541310.1103/PhysRevB.103.245413 ↗
46. 10.1073/pnas.241611112210.1073/pnas.2416111122 ↗
47. 10.1073/pnas.20248609910.1073/pnas.202486099 ↗
48. 10.1039/C6CP05419F10.1039/C6CP05419F ↗
49. 10.1021/j100130a02410.1021/j100130a024 ↗
50. 10.1021/ma00011a02110.1021/ma00011a021 ↗
51. Donati I. · 2009 · 1
52. 10.1021/ma991645q10.1021/ma991645q ↗
53. 10.1021/ma302055m10.1021/ma302055m ↗
54. Sang-Wook L. · 2013
55. 10.1021/ma800732j10.1021/ma800732j ↗
56. Kashem M. N. H. · J. Polym. Sci. · 2022
57. 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.02212210.1103/PhysRevE.94.022122 ↗