journal article·2026-05-20Open access

Unraveling Structure–Performance Trade-Offs in Porous Transport Layers for PEM Water Electrolysis

Navneet Goswami, Sergio Diaz Abad, Jacob S. Spendelow, Siddharth Komini Babu, Wilton J. M. Kort-Kamp

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 18· Issue 19

Abstract

Scalable hydrogen production using proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers (PEMWEs) depends on overcoming efficiency losses arising from coupled multiphase, multicomponent transport, and interfacial phenomena across the membrane electrode assembly. Here, we demonstrate a multiscale computational framework that combines pore network modeling with finite-element-based reactive transport simulations to accurately and efficiently resolve structure-performance trade-offs in porous transport layers (PTLs). We perform experiments for both commercial single-layer PTLs and microporous layer (MPL)-integrated configurations to benchmark the electrochemical model, achieving excellent agreement between modeling and measurements. We show that in single-layer PTLs, open porous networks facilitate mass transport but incur large voltage penalties from the PTL-anode catalyst layer (ACL) contact resistance. Bilayer architectures with thin and moderately dense MPLs reduce these losses by simultaneously improving transport and contact. Finally, in stratified multilayer stacks, combining fine pores near the ACL with highly porous backing layers delivers an enhanced performance at high current densities. Altogether, these results establish mechanistic guidelines for porosity-informed PTL design that minimize interfacial resistance and enable high-efficiency PEMWE operation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Earth and Environmental Sciences Division

Los Alamos National Laboratory

Materials Physics and Applications Division

Theoretical Division

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0224910.1021/acsenergylett.0c02249 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0260810.1021/acsenergylett.1c02608 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.15110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
4. 10.1149/2.1441704jes10.1149/2.1441704jes ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20200632810.1002/adma.202006328 ↗
6. 10.1002/sstr.20220013010.1002/sstr.202200130 ↗
7. 10.1149/2.0181611jes10.1149/2.0181611jes ↗
8. 10.1021/acsaem.5c0143810.1021/acsaem.5c01438 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20210199810.1002/aenm.202101998 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20250008610.1002/smll.202500086 ↗
11. 10.1039/D2SE00260D10.1039/D2SE00260D ↗
12. 10.1002/sus2.23010.1002/sus2.230 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20241026210.1002/adfm.202410262 ↗
14. 10.1002/advs.20230944010.1002/advs.202309440 ↗
15. 10.1002/advs.20210295010.1002/advs.202102950 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12461610.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124616 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.powera.2022.10009510.1016/j.powera.2022.100095 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.12254110.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122541 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13664110.1016/j.electacta.2020.136641 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10058010.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100580 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.5c0778810.1021/acsami.5c07788 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.4c0000610.1021/acsami.4c00006 ↗
23. 10.1007/s40820-025-01831-z10.1007/s40820-025-01831-z ↗
24. 10.1016/j.coelec.2024.10162410.1016/j.coelec.2024.101624 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.0561904jes10.1149/2.0561904jes ↗
26. 10.1149/2.1241908jes10.1149/2.1241908jes ↗
27. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac1eb410.1149/1945-7111/ac1eb4 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20200292610.1002/aenm.202002926 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.13410.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.134 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20190321610.1002/aenm.201903216 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.3c0689910.1021/acsami.3c06899 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.checat.2024.10106310.1016/j.checat.2024.101063 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20230278610.1002/aenm.202302786 ↗
34. 10.1021/jacsau.4c0019910.1021/jacsau.4c00199 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.3c1234510.1021/acsami.3c12345 ↗
36. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c0654010.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06540 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.12538410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.125384 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.16710.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.167 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22691010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226910 ↗
40. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab655710.1149/1945-7111/ab6557 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23265410.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232654 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.11908910.1016/j.enconman.2024.119089 ↗
43. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c0263510.1021/acssuschemeng.5c02635 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.11210.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.112 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10178310.1016/j.isci.2020.101783 ↗
46. 10.1149/2.0111907jes10.1149/2.0111907jes ↗
47. 10.1002/adfm.20221246210.1002/adfm.202212462 ↗
48. GeoDict 2025 User Guide ; Math2Market GmbH, Germany.
49. 10.21105/joss.0129610.21105/joss.01296 ↗
50. 10.1109/MCSE.2016.4910.1109/MCSE.2016.49 ↗
51. COMSOL. https://www.comsol.com/release/6.2 (accessed April 24, 2026).
52. 10.1149/2.1141409jes10.1149/2.1141409jes ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.00510.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.005 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsami.2c0496210.1021/acsami.2c04962 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.02330710.1103/PhysRevE.96.023307 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.13910.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.139 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.11607010.1016/j.enconman.2022.116070 ↗
58. 10.1149/1945-7111/acc89810.1149/1945-7111/acc898 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16072210.1016/j.cej.2025.160722 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ces.2022.11760010.1016/j.ces.2022.117600 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23091510.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230915 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23420910.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234209 ↗
63. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab927c10.1149/1945-7111/ab927c ↗
64. 10.1149/2.0041712jes10.1149/2.0041712jes ↗
65. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.08610.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.086 ↗