Dynamics of Radiation Damage Buildup in Ultrathin Hexagonal Boron Nitride Films under Ion Bombardment
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Two-dimensional hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) is attractive for several emerging applications. Ion bombardment can be used to modify the hBN properties. However, the understanding of radiation damage buildup in hBN remains limited. Here, we investigate the effects of the dose rate and ion mass on radiation damage buildup by studying 40 nm-thick hBN films bombarded at room temperature with 500 keV 4 He, 15 N, 40 Ar, and 129 Xe ions and comparing with results for ion bombardment of polycrystalline hBN ceramics. Raman spectroscopy is used to quantify damage buildup, and transmission electron microscopy is used for microstructural analysis. Experiments are complemented by molecular dynamics simulations of the formation and evolution of point defects. Lighter ions are found to be more efficient at disordering hBN than heavier ions. This observation points to a critical role of intracascade defect processes. In contrast, a negligible dose rate effect observed suggests limited intercascade defect dynamic annealing processes for these irradiation conditions. These findings provide a fundamental basis for hBN defect engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Stanford University
SLAC-Stanford Battery Research Center
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Funding
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · Stanford University · Laboratory Directed Research and Development
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.42.31710.1103/RevModPhys.42.317 ↗
2. 10.1038/s42254-018-0016-010.1038/s42254-018-0016-0 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.09.00510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.09.005 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20210158910.1002/adma.202101589 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41928-020-00529-x10.1038/s41928-020-00529-x ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.7b0682710.1021/acsami.7b06827 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.6b0987510.1021/acsami.6b09875 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41563-021-01187-w10.1038/s41563-021-01187-w ↗
9. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0617910.1021/acsanm.3c06179 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0755810.1021/acs.jpcc.4c07558 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nima.2011.07.04010.1016/j.nima.2011.07.040 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0545810.1021/acsomega.1c05458 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.02210.1016/j.joule.2019.03.022 ↗
14. 10.1038/nnano.2014.15210.1038/nnano.2014.152 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl503125u10.1021/nl503125u ↗
16. 10.1038/nature1147510.1038/nature11475 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0520810.1021/acsnano.4c05208 ↗
18. 10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.497708710.1063/1.4977087 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.8b1714510.1021/acsami.8b17145 ↗
21. 10.1021/nn900744z10.1021/nn900744z ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.4c1280210.1021/acsami.4c12802 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c0353010.1021/acs.nanolett.5c03530 ↗
24. Wu, Y.; Tzeng, Y.K.; Chen, H.; Xu, K.; Yan, G.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Majumdar, A.; Cui, Y.; Chu, S. Single-Ion Spectroscopy of h-BN Point Defect Fluorescence in Liquid Environments, 2024. 10.48550/arXiv.2407.01934.10.48550/arXiv.2407.01934 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41586-020-2375-910.1038/s41586-020-2375-9 ↗
26. 10.1039/D4CP03655G10.1039/D4CP03655G ↗
27. Wu, Y.; Tzeng, Y.K.; Chen, H.; Xu, K.; Yan, G.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Majumdar, A.; Cui, Y.; Chu, S. Defect Engineered Hexagonal-Boron Nitride Enables Ionic Conduction for Lithium Metal Batteries, 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2510.27021.10.48550/arXiv.2510.27021 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.164945910.1063/1.1649459 ↗
29. Nordlund K. · 201910.1049/PBCS045E_ch10 ↗
30. 10.1149/2162-8777/abfc2310.1149/2162-8777/abfc23 ↗
31. 10.1002/pssc.20098295610.1002/pssc.200982956 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.diamond.2018.12.02010.1016/j.diamond.2018.12.020 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.11675610.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.116756 ↗
34. 10.1109/PROC.1972.885410.1109/PROC.1972.8854 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.09550210.1103/PhysRevLett.109.095502 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.21610110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.216101 ↗
37. Ziegler J. F. · 2013
38. 10.1038/s41598-017-17781-510.1038/s41598-017-17781-5 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
40. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.11541010.1103/PhysRevB.86.115410 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0633710.1021/acsnano.9b06337 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.20520110.1103/PhysRevB.71.205201 ↗
44. 10.1364/OE.26.02303110.1364/OE.26.023031 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.00210.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.002 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.113991810.1063/1.1139918 ↗
47. 10.1002/pssb.20180041710.1002/pssb.201800417 ↗
48. 10.1126/science.118372310.1126/science.1183723 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.02010.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.020 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.1c2299510.1021/acsami.1c22995 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.actamat.2025.12173910.1016/j.actamat.2025.121739 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10967-017-5289-810.1007/s10967-017-5289-8 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.03010.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.030 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.10.02610.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.10.026 ↗
55. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00159-210.1016/S1359-6454(00)00159-2 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.03810.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.038 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.755610.1103/PhysRevB.57.7556 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00028-610.1016/S0927-796X(01)00028-6 ↗
59. 10.1038/srep4470310.1038/srep44703 ↗
60. 10.1063/5.028896610.1063/5.0288966 ↗
61. 10.1080/0033757810822988510.1080/00337578108229885 ↗
62. Fleischer R. L. · 197510.1525/9780520320239 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1436210.1103/PhysRevB.46.14362 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.11340410.1103/PhysRevB.82.113404 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.cossms.2017.09.00310.1016/j.cossms.2017.09.003 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.06411110.1103/PhysRevB.73.064111 ↗
67. 10.1063/1.498663110.1063/1.4986631 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.751010.1103/PhysRevB.62.7510 ↗