Fabrication of a P–Si/ZnO heterojunction based on galvanic cell driven and the complete degradation of RhB via fast charge transfer
Source abstract
Abstract
Semiconductor heterojunctions can significantly enhance photocatalytic degradation efficiency by facilitating rapid interfacial charge transfer. This article is based on the galvanic-cell driven principle; porous silicon (P-Si) was prepared by the carbon-catalytic etching method, and ZnO was loaded on its surface via electroless chemical deposition technology to form a P-Si/ZnO heterojunction, which was applied to the degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB). At a deposition temperature of 90 °C, a flawless 1D hexagonal prism structure of ZnO was formed, allowing the P-Si/ZnO heterojunction to completely degrade RhB within 2 hours with a degradation rate of 100%. Compared with a single P-Si material, the degradation performance is improved by 1.7 times. The formation of the built-in electric field and the rapid charge transfer at the heterojunction interface realized the complete degradation of RhB organic pollutants. After 20 cycles of use, the photocatalytic degradation rate remains above 70%, demonstrating excellent stability and recyclability.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ocular and Laser Science Research · Color Science and Applications · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Coal Conversion and New Carbon Materials, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Academy of Green Manufacturing Engineering, Wuhan University of science and technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Sun · Appl. Catal., B · 2019 · 258 · 11798510.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117985 ↗
2. Wang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 498 · 14385010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143850 ↗
3. Feng · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 290 · 16510.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.068 ↗
4. Mizrahi · Desalin. Water Treat. · 2014 · 52 · 526410.1080/19443994.2013.808392 ↗
5. Feng · Bioresour. Technol. · 2019 · 283 · 110.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.036 ↗
6. Lawrence · Nanoscale · 2023 · 15 · 278810.1039/D2NR06587H ↗
7. Wang · Nanoscale · 2023 · 15 · 1239810.1039/D3NR02543H ↗
8. Jabbar · Environ. Nanotechnol., Monit. Manage. · 2022 · 17 · 100666
9. Qiu · Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. · 2022 · 154 · 11182010.1016/j.rser.2021.111820 ↗
10. Wang · Chin. J. Catal. · 2022 · 43 · 17810.1016/S1872-2067(21)63910-4 ↗
11. Zhang · Nanoscale · 2023 · 15 · 1069310.1039/D3NR01404E ↗
12. Wang · Nanoscale · 2023 · 15 · 523010.1039/D3NR00092C ↗
13. Li · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2015 · 292 · 7910.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.006 ↗
14. Hamza · Opt. Mater. · 2022 · 124 · 11198710.1016/j.optmat.2022.111987 ↗
15. Wang · Ceram. Int. · 2018 · 44 · 129110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.035 ↗
16. Hoa · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 204 · 39710.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.10.070 ↗
17. X.Lin , Synthesis and Performance Study of Silicon Nanowire-Based Core-Shell Structure Composite Photocatalyst , Fuzhou University , Fuzhou, Fujian , 2018
18. Chen · Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2022 · 38 · 110.1016/j.cap.2022.03.001 ↗
19. Hsu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 852 · 15701410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157014 ↗
20. Le Pivert · Crystallography · 2022 · 12 · 30810.3390/cryst12030308 ↗
21. Singh · Opt. Mater. · 2020 · 107 · 11013810.1016/j.optmat.2020.110138 ↗
22. Rangelova · Mater. Today: Proc. · 2022 · 61 · 127210.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.064 ↗
23. Wen · Phys. E · 2021 · 134 · 11491310.1016/j.physe.2021.114913 ↗
24. Lan · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 529 · 14702310.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147023 ↗
25. Da Rosa · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2020 · 20 · 117710.1166/jnn.2020.16961 ↗
26. Zeng · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2018 · 441 · 4010.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.002 ↗
27. Wang · Dalton Trans. · 2021 · 50 · 301110.1039/D1DT00127B ↗
28. Chevalier-César · Appl. Phys. A · 2014 · 115 · 95310.1007/s00339-013-7908-8 ↗
29. Yang · Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 6 · 452510.1039/C5CY02090E ↗
30. van Dang · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 296 · 12033910.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120339 ↗
31. Phongamwong · Appl. Catal., B · 2023 · 325 · 12233610.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122336 ↗
32. Ahmad · Inorg. Chim. Acta · 2022 · 543 · 12116710.1016/j.ica.2022.121167 ↗
33. Kim · New J. Chem. · 2021 · 45 · 348510.1039/D0NJ05162D ↗
34. Bastatas · Nanotechnology · 2019 · 30 · 23400610.1088/1361-6528/ab087c ↗
35. Pietruszka · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2014 · 25 · 19010.1016/j.mssp.2013.11.026 ↗
36. Anjelin Ursula Portia · Inorg. Chem. Commun. · 2020 · 119 · 10805110.1016/j.inoche.2020.108051 ↗
37. Huang · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2020 · 109 · 10493210.1016/j.mssp.2020.104932 ↗
38. Zhang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2013 · 1 · 862210.1039/c3ta11390f ↗
39. Hong · Ceram. Int. · 2015 · 41 · 147710.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.082 ↗
40. Hu · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2017 · 410 · 40110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.140 ↗
41. Yang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 431010.1039/D0TA10831F ↗
42. Song · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2018 · 512 · 32510.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.080 ↗
43. Chandel · Arab. J. Chem. · 2020 · 13 · 432410.1016/j.arabjc.2019.08.005 ↗
44. Li · Appl. Catal., B · 2018 · 226 · 32410.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.051 ↗
45. Nguyen · Environ. Technol. Innovation · 2022 · 25 · 10213010.1016/j.eti.2021.102130 ↗
46. You · Appl. Catal., B · 2023 · 321 · 12194110.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121941 ↗