journal article·2021Open access

Plasmon–exciton interaction strongly increases the efficiency of a quantum dot-based near-infrared photodetector operating in the two-photon absorption mode under normal conditions

Victor Krivenkov, Pavel Samokhvalov, Ivan S. Vasil'evskii, Nikolai I. Kargin, Igor Nabiev

Nanoscale· Volume 13· Issue 47

Abstract

Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are known for their high two-photon absorption (TPA) capacity. This allows them to efficiently absorb infrared photons with energies lower than the bandgap energy. Moreover, TPA in QDs can be further enhanced by the interaction of excitons of the QDs with plasmons of a metal nanoparticle. We fabricated nonlinear plasmon-exciton photodetectors based on QDs and silver nanoplates (SNPs) to demonstrate the optoelectronic application of these effects. A thin layer of CdSe QDs was used as a source of charge carriers for a photoresistor-type photodetector. SNPs with near-infrared plasmon modes were introduced into the layer of QDs to increase the light absorption efficiency. Under near-infrared irradiation, the power of the dependence of the photocurrent on the excitation intensity was twice the power of the corresponding dependence under one-photon excitation with visible light. This proved that the new photodetector efficiently operated under two-photon excitation. Although the SNP light absorption was linear, energy was transferred from plasmons to excitons in the two-quantum mode, which led to a nonlinear dependence. Moreover, we found that the photocurrent from the designed photodetector containing the QD-SNP composite was an order of magnitude higher than that from a photodetector containing QDs alone. This can be explained by the plasmon-induced increase in the TPA efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Photonic and Optical Devices · Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Nano-Bioengineering, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 31 Kashirskoe shosse, 115409 Moscow, Russian Federation

University of Basque Country (UPV-EHU) and Centro de Física de Materiales (MPC, CSIC-UPV/EHU), Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal 5, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain

Institute of Nanoengineering in Electronics, Spintronics and Photonics, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 31 Kashirskoe shosse, 115409 Moscow, Russian Federation

Laboratoire de Recherche en Nanosciences (LRN-EA4682), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119146 Moscow, Russian Federation

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions · Russian Science Foundation · Agence Nationale de la Recherche · European Commission

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. García de Arquer · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2017 · 2 · 1
2. Sliz · ACS Nano · 2019 · 13 · 1198810.1021/acsnano.9b06125 ↗
3. de Arquer · Science · 2021 · 373 · eaaz854110.1126/science.aaz8541 ↗
4. Guyot-Sionnest · J. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 151 · 06090110.1063/1.5115501 ↗
5. Krivenkov · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2019 · 137 · 11710.1016/j.bios.2019.05.009 ↗
6. Zheng · IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 1997 · 9 · 49310.1109/68.559399 ↗
7. Hayat · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 26 · 08300110.1088/0268-1242/26/8/083001 ↗
8. Krivenkov · Opt. Lett. · 2015 · 40 · 144010.1364/OL.40.001440 ↗
9. Krivenkov · ACS Photonics · 2020 · 7 · 83110.1021/acsphotonics.9b01820 ↗
10. Scott · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 498510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00966 ↗
11. Nyk · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 04110210.1063/1.3679381 ↗
12. Van Stryland · Opt. Eng. · 1985 · 24 · 24461310.1117/12.7973538 ↗
13. Penzkofer · Opt. Quantum Electron. · 1990 · 22 · 35110.1007/BF02189218 ↗
14. Zhou · Opt. Lett. · 2017 · 42 · 311310.1364/OL.42.003113 ↗
15. Kulakovich · Nano Lett. · 2002 · 2 · 144910.1021/nl025819k ↗
16. Jin · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 352710.1021/jz401801v ↗
17. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 05310610.1063/1.2956391 ↗
18. Krivenkov · Ann. Phys. · 2020 · 200023610.1002/andp.202000236 ↗
19. Krivenkov · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2020 · 11 · 801810.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02296 ↗
20. Zhang · ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 296010.1021/acsphotonics.8b00306 ↗
21. Gong · ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 71110.1021/acsphotonics.7b01238 ↗
22. Krivenkov · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 461410.1039/D0NR08893E ↗
23. Hlaing · Opt. Mater. · 2016 · 58 · 43910.1016/j.optmat.2016.06.013 ↗
24. Samokhvalov · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2013 · 19 · 153410.1002/chem.201202860 ↗
25. Jasieniak · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1946810.1021/jp906827m ↗
26. Pu · Small · 2006 · 2 · 130810.1002/smll.200600157 ↗
27. Dakovski · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 01430110.1063/1.4811349 ↗
28. Scott · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 498510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00966 ↗
29. Zhang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1893110.1021/ja2080345 ↗
30. Talgorn · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 344110.1021/jp9109546 ↗
31. Jarosz · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 1258510.1021/jp034849o ↗
32. Zengin · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 114 · 110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.157401 ↗
33. Aliya Hamizi · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2012 · 7 · 845810.1016/S1452-3981(23)18007-2 ↗