journal article·2014

Dynamic nanocrystal response and high temperature growth of carbon nanotube–ferroelectric hybrid nanostructure

Ashok Kumar, J. F. Scott, R. S. Katiyar

Nanoscale· Volume 6· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

A long standing problem related to the capping of carbon nanotubes (CNT) by inorganic materials at high temperature has been solved. In situ dynamic response of Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 (PZT) nanocrystals attached to the wings of the outer surface of PZT/CNT hybrid-nanostructure has been demonstrated under a constant-energy high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) e-beam. PZT nanocrystals revealed that the crystal orientations, positions, faces, and hopping states change with time. HRTEM study has been performed to investigate the microstructure of hybrid nanostructures and nanosize polycrystal trapped across the wings. Raman spectroscopy was utilized to investigate the local structures, defects, crystal qualities and temperature dependent growth and degradation of hybrid nanostructures. Raman spectra indicate that MWCNT and PZT/MWCNT/n-Si possess good quality of CNT before and after PZT deposition until 650 °C. The monoclinic Cc/Cm phase of PZT which is optimum in piezoelectric properties was prominent in the hybrid structure and should be useful for device applications. An unusual hexagonal faceting oscillation of the nano-crystal perimeter on a 10-30 s period is also observed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Eder · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 134810.1021/cr800433k ↗
2. Moore · Electronics · 1965 · 38 · 114
3. Bondyopadhyay · Proc. IEEE · 1998 · 86 · 7810.1109/5.658761 ↗
4. http://www.itrs.net/Links/2010ITRS/2010Update/ToPost/ERD_ERM_2010FINALReportMemoryAssessment_ITRS.pdf
5. Powell · Proc. IEEE · 2008 · 96 · 124710.1109/JPROC.2008.925411 ↗
6. Kawasaki · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 05310910.1063/1.2841710 ↗
7. Kumar · Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 16570210.1088/0957-4484/23/16/165702 ↗
8. Iijima · Nature · 1991 · 354 · 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
9. Geim · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 18310.1038/nmat1849 ↗
10. Awano · Proc. IEEE · 2010 · 98 · 201510.1109/JPROC.2010.2068030 ↗
11. Scott · Science · 1989 · 246 · 140010.1126/science.246.4936.1400 ↗
12. Ebbesen · Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. · 1994 · 24 · 23510.1146/annurev.ms.24.080194.001315 ↗
13. Kumar · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 289110.1021/jp910252f ↗
14. Kumar · Mater. Lett. · 2012 · 68 · 4710.1016/j.matlet.2011.10.023 ↗
15. Knechtel · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 196110.1063/1.122335 ↗
16. Bhattacharyya · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 13 · 2043510.1039/c1cp22311a ↗
17. Choi · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2011 · 19 · 22110.1016/j.diamond.2009.09.005 ↗
18. Ortega · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2008 · 77 · 01411110.1103/PhysRevB.77.014111 ↗
19. Ajayan · Nature · 1993 · 362 · 52210.1038/362522a0 ↗
20. D. B. Williams and C. B.Carter, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Plenum, New York, 199610.1007/978-1-4757-2519-3 ↗
21. Correa · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2011 · 83 · 01430210.1103/PhysRevB.83.014302 ↗
22. Katiyar · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1971 · 4 · 263510.1103/PhysRevB.4.2635 ↗
23. Zhang · Carbon · 2002 · 40 · 242910.1016/S0008-6223(02)00148-3 ↗
24. Noheda · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 205910.1063/1.123756 ↗
25. Noheda · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2000 · 61 · 868710.1103/PhysRevB.61.8687 ↗
26. Gruverman · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2006 · 69 · 244310.1088/0034-4885/69/8/R04 ↗
27. M. Alexe and A.Gruverman, Ferroelectrics at Nanoscale: Scanning Probe Microscopy Approach, ed. M. Alexe and A. Gruverman, Springer, Berlin, 200410.1007/978-3-662-08901-9 ↗