journal article·2020Open access

High broadband photoconductivity of few-layered MoS 2 field-effect transistors measured using multi-terminal methods: effects of contact resistance

Priyanka Das, Jawnaye Nash, Micah Webb, Raelyn Burns, Varun N. Mapara, Govinda Ghimire, Daniel Rosenmann, Ralu Divan, Denis Karaiskaj, Stephen A. McGill, Anirudha V. Sumant, Qilin Dai, Paresh C. Ray, Bhausaheb Tawade, Dharmaraj Raghavan, Alamgir Karim, Nihar R. Pradhan

Nanoscale· Volume 12· Issue 45

Abstract

Among the layered two dimensional semiconductors, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is considered to be an excellent candidate for applications in optoelectronics and integrated circuits due to its layer-dependent tunable bandgap in the visible region, high ON/OFF current ratio in field-effect transistors (FET) and strong light-matter interaction properties. In this study, using multi-terminal measurements, we report high broadband photocurrent response (R) and external quantum efficiency (EQE) of few-atomic layered MoS2 phototransistors fabricated on a SiO2 dielectric substrate and encapsulated with a thin transparent polymer film of Cytop. The photocurrent response was measured using a white light source as well as a monochromatic light of wavelength λ = 400 nm-900 nm. We measured responsivity using a 2-terminal configuration as high as R = 1 × 103 A W-1 under white light illumination with an optical power Popt = 0.02 nW. The R value increased to 3.5 × 103 A W-1 when measured using a 4-terminal configuration. Using monochromatic light on the same device, the measured values of R were 103 and 6 × 103 A W-1 under illumination of λ = 400 nm when measured using 2- and 4-terminal methods, respectively. The highest EQE values obtained using λ = 400 nm were 105% and 106% measured using 2- and 4-terminal configurations, respectively. The wavelength dependent responsivity decreased from 400 nm to the near-IR region at 900 nm. The observed photoresponse, photocurrent-dark current ratio (PDCR), detectivity as a function of applied gate voltage, optical power, contact resistances and wavelength were measured and are discussed in detail. The observed responsivity is also thoroughly studied as a function of contact resistance of the device.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Graphene research and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Layered Materials and Device Physics Laboratory

Department of Chemistry

Physics and Atmospheric Science

Jackson State University

Jackson

Department of Physics

University of South Florida

Tampa 33620

USA

Center for Nanoscale Materials

Argonne National Laboratory

Lemont

National High Magnetic Field Laboratory

Tallahassee

525 College Street

NW

Howard University

Washington DC 20059

Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering

University of Houston

Houston

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy · National Science Foundation

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Kallhammer · Nat. Photonics · 2006 · 5 · 1210.1038/nphoton.2006.5 ↗
2. Lussani · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2015 · 86 · 06370510.1063/1.4922607 ↗
3. Bartels · Science · 2002 · 297 · 37610.1126/science.1071718 ↗
4. Zeskind · Nat. Methods · 2007 · 4 · 56710.1038/nmeth1053 ↗
5. Qian · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2008 · 26 · 8310.1038/nbt1377 ↗
6. Formisano · Science · 2004 · 306 · 175810.1126/science.1101732 ↗
7. B. Fowler , C.Liu , S.Mims , J.Balicki , W.Li , H.Do , J.Appelbaum and P.Vu , Sensors, Cameras, and Systems for Industrial/Scientific Applications XI (International Society for Optics and Photonics) , 2010 , vol. 7536 , p. 753607
8. Chu · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 800010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03218 ↗
9. Mak · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
10. Desai · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 459210.1021/nl501638a ↗
11. Britnell · Science · 2013 · 340 · 131110.1126/science.1235547 ↗
12. Wurstbauer · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 17300110.1088/1361-6463/aa5f81 ↗
13. Chakraborty · Nano Lett. · 2018 · 18 · 645510.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02932 ↗
14. Yin · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 7410.1021/nn2024557 ↗
15. Lopez-Sanchez · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 49710.1038/nnano.2013.100 ↗
16. Perea-Lopez · 2D Mater. · 2014 · 1 · 01100410.1088/2053-1583/1/1/011004 ↗
17. Pradhan · 2D Mater. · 2016 · 3 · 04100410.1088/2053-1583/3/4/041004 ↗
18. Pradhan · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 1208010.1021/acsami.5b02264 ↗
19. Garcia · J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 124 · 20430610.1063/1.5050821 ↗
20. Walker · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2016 · 213 · 306510.1002/pssa.201600395 ↗
21. Ghosh · Nanotechnology · 2018 · 29 · 48400210.1088/1361-6528/aae049 ↗
22. Rivera · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 4297310.1038/srep42973 ↗
23. Jo · Adv. Sci. · 2018 · 5 · 170042310.1002/advs.201700423 ↗
24. Zhang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 407610.1002/adfm.201500969 ↗
25. Liu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 193810.1002/adfm.201504408 ↗
26. Tanthirige · Semicond. Sci. Inf. Devices · 2020 · 1 · 1910.30564/ssid.v1i2.1526 ↗
27. Choi · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 590210.1002/adma.201290270 ↗
28. Choi · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 583210.1002/adma.201201909 ↗
29. Tsai · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 390510.1021/nn305301b ↗
30. Lee · ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 474510.1021/acsphotonics.8b01049 ↗
31. Zhang · CrystEngComm · 2015 · 17 · 402610.1039/C5CE00484E ↗
32. Yoon · Appl. Microsc. · 2017 · 47 · 1910.9729/AM.2017.47.1.19 ↗
33. Pradhan · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 792310.1021/nn501693d ↗
34. Pradhan · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 837710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04100 ↗
35. Pradhan · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 897910.1038/srep08979 ↗
36. Pradhan · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1844910.1039/C9NR04598H ↗
37. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2020 · 8 · 311310.1039/C9TC06331E ↗
38. Choi · J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2014 · 64 · 155010.3938/jkps.64.1550 ↗
39. Farmanbar · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 08530410.1103/PhysRevB.93.085304 ↗
40. Kang · Phys. Rev. X · 2014 · 4 · 031005
41. Pradhan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 12310510.1063/1.4799172 ↗
42. Radisavljevic · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 14710.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
43. Wang · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 467410.1021/nl302015v ↗
44. Das · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 10010.1021/nl303583v ↗
45. Song · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2017 · 8 · 1
46. Hong · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 1
47. Yang · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 1238310.1039/C4NR03472D ↗
48. Ryu · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 1313310.1039/C7CP00589J ↗
49. Kim · Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 1
50. Ulaganathan · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 228410.1039/C5NR05988G ↗
51. Rashkeev · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 16550610.1103/PhysRevLett.87.165506 ↗
52. Lee · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 67610.1038/nnano.2014.150 ↗
53. Andleeb · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 830810.1039/C7TC01736G ↗
54. Liu · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 303010.1021/nl504957p ↗
55. Forsberg · PLoS One · 2016 · 11 · 110.1371/journal.pone.0154522 ↗
56. Mukherjee · ACS Photonics · 2015 · 2 · 76010.1021/acsphotonics.5b00111 ↗
57. Li · Nanomaterials · 2019 · 9 · 136610.3390/nano9101366 ↗
58. Lee · Small · 2014 · 10 · 235610.1002/smll.201303908 ↗
59. So · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2016 · 387 · 28010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.166 ↗
60. Tsai · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 262810.1038/srep02628 ↗
61. Lien · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2011 · 32 · 156410.1109/LED.2011.2164570 ↗
62. Wei · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2014 · 20 · 3802006