journal article·2017Open access

Drastic difference between hole and electron injection through the gradient shell of Cd x Se y Zn 1−x S 1−y quantum dots

Mohamed Abdellah, Felipe Poulsen, Qiushi Zhu, Nan Zhu, Karel Žídek, Pavel Chábera, Annamaria Corti, Thorsten Hansen, Qijin Chi, Sophie E. Canton, Kaibo Zheng, Tõnu Pullerits

Nanoscale· Volume 9· Issue 34

Abstract

Ultrafast fluorescence spectroscopy was used to investigate the hole injection in CdxSeyZn1-xS1-y gradient core-shell quantum dot (CSQD) sensitized p-type NiO photocathodes. A series of CSQDs with a wide range of shell thicknesses was studied. Complementary photoelectrochemical cell measurements were carried out to confirm that the hole injection from the active core through the gradient shell to NiO takes place. The hole injection from the valence band of the QDs to NiO depends much less on the shell thickness when compared to the corresponding electron injection to n-type semiconductor (ZnO). We simulate the charge carrier tunneling through the potential barrier due to the gradient shell by numerically solving the Schrödinger equation. The details of the band alignment determining the potential barrier are obtained from X-ray spectroscopy measurements. The observed drastic differences between the hole and electron injection are consistent with a model where the hole effective mass decreases, while the gradient shell thickness increases.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Chemical Physics and NanoLund

Lund University

Lund

Sweden

Department of Chemistry

University of Copenhagen

DK 2100 Copenhagen

Denmark

Technical University of Denmark

DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby

Zhang Dayu School of Chemistry

Regional Centre for Special Optics and Optoelectronic Systems (TOPTEC)

Institute of Plasma Physics

Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

182 00 Prague 8

Czech Republic

Ångström Laboratory

Uppsala University

75120 Uppsala

Attosecond Science group

Deutsches Elektronensynchrotron DESY

D-22607 Hamburg

Germany

ELI-ALPS

Gas Processing Center

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Nozik · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 273510.1021/nl102122x ↗
2. Kamat · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 90810.1021/jz400052e ↗
3. Kamat · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 1873710.1021/jp806791s ↗
4. Guijarro · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 13 · 1202410.1039/c1cp20290a ↗
5. Zídek · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 639310.1021/nl303746d ↗
6. Semonin · Science · 2011 · 334 · 153010.1126/science.1209845 ↗
7. Karki · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 228710.1038/srep02287 ↗
8. Karki · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 586910.1038/ncomms6869 ↗
9. Lan · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 463010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01957 ↗
10. Jin · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 528410.1002/adfm.201601570 ↗
11. Makhal · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 62710.1021/jp908376b ↗
12. Chuang · Nat. Mater. · 2014 · 13 · 79610.1038/nmat3984 ↗
13. Gopi · Dalton Trans. · 2015 · 44 · 63010.1039/C4DT03063J ↗
14. Bae · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 53110.1021/cm070754d ↗
15. Zhu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1503810.1021/ja106710m ↗
16. Reiss · Small · 2009 · 5 · 15410.1002/smll.200800841 ↗
17. Smith · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2010 · 43 · 19010.1021/ar9001069 ↗
18. Cragg · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 31310.1021/nl903592h ↗
19. Abdellah · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 176010.1021/jz4006459 ↗
20. Barceló · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 2250910.1021/jp406989v ↗
21. Wang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 927510.1021/ja403701p ↗
22. Zheng · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1846210.1021/jp506963q ↗
23. Groeneveld · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 791310.1021/nn402931y ↗
24. Maiti · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 191810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09904 ↗
25. Debnath · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2017 · 23 · 375510.1002/chem.201605612 ↗
26. Abdellah · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 2580210.1021/jp5086284 ↗
27. Zídek · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1211010.1021/ja3029679 ↗
28. Omogo · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 231710.1021/jp309368q ↗
29. Kamat · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2012 · 45 · 190610.1021/ar200315d ↗
30. Zheng · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2012 · 117 · 591910.1021/jp3098632 ↗
31. Klimov · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2007 · 58 · 63510.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104537 ↗
32. Malko · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 525010.1021/jp037699q ↗
33. Hansen · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 115710.1021/jz5001193 ↗
34. Dworak · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 394910.1021/jp111574w ↗
35. Deibel · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 409710.1002/adma.201000376 ↗
36. Alhaidari · Phys. Rev. A · 2002 · 66 · 4211610.1103/PhysRevA.66.042116 ↗
37. Meulenberg · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 32510.1021/nn8006916 ↗
38. Wang · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter · 1981 · 24 · 339310.1103/PhysRevB.24.3393 ↗