journal article·2020

Low-loss aluminum epitaxial film for scalable and sustainable plasmonics: direct comparison with silver epitaxial film

Soniya S. Raja, Chang-Wei Cheng, Shangjr Gwo

Nanoscale· Volume 12· Issue 46
Publisher page

Abstract

Aluminum is a plasmonic material well known for its excellent stability, complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor compatibility and wide availability as compared to popular plasmonic materials such as gold and silver. Aluminum can support surface plasmon resonances in a broad spectral range, including the deep ultra-violet, a regime where no other plasmonic materials can work. However, conventional aluminum films suffer from high losses in the visible region and low fidelity and reproducibility in nanofabrication, making aluminum plasmonics non-ideal for applications. Herein, we report the experimental results of consistent surface plasmon propagation length measurements for epitaxially grown aluminum and silver films (epifilms), using three different methods (white light interferometry, laser scattering and spectroscopic ellipsometry) in the full visible spectrum. In order to avoid losses caused by inferior material quality, we used single-crystalline aluminum and silver films for direct comparison. We found that, on directly comparing with the silver epifilm, the aluminum epifilm possesses reasonably long plasmon propagation lengths in the full visible range and outperforms silver in the deep blue region. These results illustrate the great potential of epitaxial aluminum films for visible-spectrum plasmonic applications, resulting from their superior crystallinity and excellent surface and interface properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Optical Coatings and Gratings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of NanoEngineering and MicroSystems

National Tsing-Hua University

Hsinchu 30013

Taiwan

Department of Physics

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. West · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2010 · 4 · 79510.1002/lpor.200900055 ↗
2. Boltasseva · Science · 2011 · 331 · 29010.1126/science.1198258 ↗
3. Naik · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 326410.1002/adma.201205076 ↗
4. Doiron · ACS Photonics · 2019 · 6 · 24010.1021/acsphotonics.8b01369 ↗
5. Knight · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 83410.1021/nn405495q ↗
6. DeSantis · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 977210.1021/acsnano.6b07223 ↗
7. Gerard · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 48 · 18400110.1088/0022-3727/48/18/184001 ↗
8. Cheng · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 985210.1021/acsnano.6b05556 ↗
9. Cheng · ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 262410.1021/acsphotonics.7b01366 ↗
10. Fedyanin · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 36210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03942 ↗
11. Chew · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 521 · 14637710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146377 ↗
12. Naik · Opt. Mater. Express · 2012 · 2 · 47810.1364/OME.2.000478 ↗
13. Zgrabik · Opt. Mater. Express · 2015 · 5 · 278610.1364/OME.5.002786 ↗
14. Shah · ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 281610.1021/acsphotonics.7b01553 ↗
15. Guo · ACS Photonics · 2019 · 6 · 184810.1021/acsphotonics.9b00617 ↗
16. Barnes · Nature · 2003 · 424 · 82410.1038/nature01937 ↗
17. S. A. Maier , Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications , Springer , New York , 200710.1007/0-387-37825-1 ↗
18. Ehrenreich · Phys. Rev. · 1962 · 128 · 162210.1103/PhysRev.128.1622 ↗
19. Olmon · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2012 · 86 · 23514710.1103/PhysRevB.86.235147 ↗
20. Jha · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 196610.1021/ja210446w ↗
21. Tian · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 507110.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02338 ↗
22. Raja · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 883810.1021/acsnano.0c03462 ↗
23. Zheng · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 631810.1002/adma.201401168 ↗
24. Guo · Nano Lett. · 2020 · 20 · 285710.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00645 ↗
25. Castro-Lopez · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 467410.1021/nl202255g ↗
26. Knight · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 600010.1021/nl303517v ↗
27. Ross · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1250610.1021/jp503323u ↗
28. Dabos · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 1338010.1038/s41598-018-31736-4 ↗
29. Xu · Nat. Commun. · 2010 · 1 · 5910.1038/ncomms1058 ↗
30. Liberman · ACS Photonics · 2016 · 3 · 79610.1021/acsphotonics.5b00751 ↗
31. Yokogawa · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 434910.1021/nl302110z ↗
32. Olson · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2014 · 111 · 1434810.1073/pnas.1415970111 ↗
33. Tan · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 402310.1021/nl501460x ↗
34. Fleischman · ACS Photonics · 2019 · 6 · 33210.1021/acsphotonics.8b01634 ↗
35. Rakić · Appl. Opt. · 1998 · 37 · 527110.1364/AO.37.005271 ↗
36. Ehrenreich · Phys. Rev. · 1963 · 132 · 191810.1103/PhysRev.132.1918 ↗
37. Wardley · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 52 · 07400410.1088/1361-6463/aaf260 ↗
38. Ditlbacher · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 25740310.1103/PhysRevLett.95.257403 ↗
39. Huang · Nat. Commun. · 2010 · 1 · 15010.1038/ncomms1143 ↗
40. Wang · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 773410.1038/ncomms8734 ↗
41. Gwo · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2016 · 45 · 567210.1039/C6CS00450D ↗
42. Nagpal · Science · 2009 · 325 · 59410.1126/science.1174655 ↗
43. Park · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 398810.1002/adma.201200812 ↗
44. Lu · Science · 2012 · 337 · 45010.1126/science.1223504 ↗
45. Wu · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 610610.1002/adma.201401474 ↗
46. Cheng · Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 318910.1021/acsami.8b16667 ↗
47. McClain · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 275110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00614 ↗
48. Baburin · Opt. Mater. Express · 2018 · 8 · 325410.1364/OME.8.003254 ↗