journal article·2020

Promising modulation of self-assembled Ge-rich QDs by ultra-heavy phosphorus doping

Ningning Zhang, Peizong Chen, Kun Peng, Lijian Zhang, Tao Liu, Jia Yan, Zuimin Jiang, Zhenyang Zhong

Nanoscale· Volume 12· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Self-assembled Ge-rich quantum dots (QDs) can not only act as a prototype model for the fundamental studies of heteroepitaxial growth but also have great potential in optoelectronic devices for telecommunication and monolithic optical-electronic integrated circuits. Here, we report the unique features of Ge-rich QDs ultra-heavily doped with phosphorus (P) and embedded in a thin SiGe alloy film on Si (001) substrates. The ultra-heavy P doping considerably reduces the size of Ge-rich QDs and improves their uniformity. The inherent mechanism is associated with the reductions of both surface energy and the diffusion length of adatoms during QD growth promoted by the P dopants. Raman spectra indicate that the Ge content and strain in QDs are essentially not modified by the P doping. Particularly, the power- and temperature-dependent photoluminescence (PL) spectra demonstrate a type-I band alignment of Ge-rich QDs/SiGe alloy film due to the ultra-heavy P doping, which gives rise to additional low energy levels of electrons in QDs. Moreover, the PL of Ge-rich QDs is remarkably enhanced by ultra-heavy P doping at temperatures over 80 K. Over 3 times enhancement is obtained at 245 K. These results indicate that the overall quantum efficiency of Ge-rich QDs is substantially improved by the ultra-heavy P doping, which facilitates the applications of Ge-rich QDs in Si-based innovative optoelectronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photonic and Optical Devices · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics and Department of Physics

Fudan University

Shanghai 200438

People's Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Atabaki · Nature · 2018 · 556 · 34910.1038/s41586-018-0028-z ↗
2. Saito · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 31 · 04300210.1088/0268-1242/31/4/043002 ↗
3. Sun · Nature · 2015 · 528 · 53410.1038/nature16454 ↗
4. Sunamura · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 66 · 302410.1063/1.114265 ↗
5. Wang · Proc. IEEE · 2007 · 95 · 186610.1109/JPROC.2007.900971 ↗
6. Armand Pilon · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 272410.1038/s41467-019-10655-6 ↗
7. Liu · Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 35 · 67910.1364/OL.35.000679 ↗
8. Liu · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 27 · 09400610.1088/0268-1242/27/9/094006 ↗
9. Camacho-Aguilera · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 1131610.1364/OE.20.011316 ↗
10. Chaisakul · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 19110710.1063/1.4805004 ↗
11. Qin · J. Cryst. Growth · 2005 · 278 · 13610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.12.106 ↗
12. Kamins · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 222010.1063/1.1361096 ↗
13. Kamins · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 156210.1063/1.1635994 ↗
14. Portavoce · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2004 · 69 · 15541610.1103/PhysRevB.69.155416 ↗
15. Tong · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 08110410.1063/1.1929068 ↗
16. Sustersic · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 18310310.1063/1.3114377 ↗
17. Scappucci · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 260010.1039/c3nr34258a ↗
18. Sun · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. · 2010 · 16 · 12410.1109/JSTQE.2009.2027445 ↗
19. Zhang · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1548710.1039/C9NR00798A ↗
20. Zipoli · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 19190810.1063/1.2926683 ↗
21. Oliva-Chatelain · AIMS Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 3 · 110.3934/matersci.2016.1.1 ↗
22. Oliva-Chatelain · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 173310.1039/C5NR04978D ↗
23. Medeiros-Ribeiro · Science · 1998 · 279 · 35310.1126/science.279.5349.353 ↗
24. Osten · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 45010.1103/PhysRevLett.69.450 ↗
25. Wang · Nanotechnology · 2017 · 28 · 11570110.1088/1361-6528/aa5b3d ↗
26. Valakh · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 14190910.1063/1.3383241 ↗
27. Perova · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 03350210.1063/1.3536508 ↗
28. Pezzoli · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2008 · 11 · 27910.1016/j.mssp.2008.09.012 ↗
29. Dashiell · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 226110.1063/1.1405148 ↗
30. Boucaud · Photonics Res. · 2013 · 1 · 10210.1364/PRJ.1.000102 ↗
31. Fan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 18310610.1063/1.4831750 ↗
32. Geiger · Front. Mater. · 2015 · 2 · 5210.3389/fmats.2015.00052 ↗
33. Gaubas · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2007 · 154 · H23110.1149/1.2429031 ↗
34. Tsybeskov · Proc. IEEE · 2009 · 97 · 128410.1109/JPROC.2009.2020711 ↗
35. Grydlik · ACS Photonics · 2016 · 3 · 29810.1021/acsphotonics.5b00671 ↗
36. Wan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 176310.1063/1.1356454 ↗
37. Zhou · Opt. Express · 2019 · 27 · 2217310.1364/OE.27.022173 ↗
38. Smith · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2014 · 89 · 03530610.1103/PhysRevB.89.035306 ↗
39. El Kurdi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 01371010.1063/1.3279307 ↗
40. Brehm · New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 06302110.1088/1367-2630/11/6/063021 ↗