Promising modulation of self-assembled Ge-rich QDs by ultra-heavy phosphorus doping
Source abstract
Abstract
Self-assembled Ge-rich quantum dots (QDs) can not only act as a prototype model for the fundamental studies of heteroepitaxial growth but also have great potential in optoelectronic devices for telecommunication and monolithic optical-electronic integrated circuits. Here, we report the unique features of Ge-rich QDs ultra-heavily doped with phosphorus (P) and embedded in a thin SiGe alloy film on Si (001) substrates. The ultra-heavy P doping considerably reduces the size of Ge-rich QDs and improves their uniformity. The inherent mechanism is associated with the reductions of both surface energy and the diffusion length of adatoms during QD growth promoted by the P dopants. Raman spectra indicate that the Ge content and strain in QDs are essentially not modified by the P doping. Particularly, the power- and temperature-dependent photoluminescence (PL) spectra demonstrate a type-I band alignment of Ge-rich QDs/SiGe alloy film due to the ultra-heavy P doping, which gives rise to additional low energy levels of electrons in QDs. Moreover, the PL of Ge-rich QDs is remarkably enhanced by ultra-heavy P doping at temperatures over 80 K. Over 3 times enhancement is obtained at 245 K. These results indicate that the overall quantum efficiency of Ge-rich QDs is substantially improved by the ultra-heavy P doping, which facilitates the applications of Ge-rich QDs in Si-based innovative optoelectronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photonic and Optical Devices · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics and Department of Physics
Fudan University
Shanghai 200438
People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Atabaki · Nature · 2018 · 556 · 34910.1038/s41586-018-0028-z ↗
2. Saito · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 31 · 04300210.1088/0268-1242/31/4/043002 ↗
3. Sun · Nature · 2015 · 528 · 53410.1038/nature16454 ↗
4. Sunamura · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 66 · 302410.1063/1.114265 ↗
5. Wang · Proc. IEEE · 2007 · 95 · 186610.1109/JPROC.2007.900971 ↗
6. Armand Pilon · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 272410.1038/s41467-019-10655-6 ↗
7. Liu · Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 35 · 67910.1364/OL.35.000679 ↗
8. Liu · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 27 · 09400610.1088/0268-1242/27/9/094006 ↗
9. Camacho-Aguilera · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 1131610.1364/OE.20.011316 ↗
10. Chaisakul · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 19110710.1063/1.4805004 ↗
11. Qin · J. Cryst. Growth · 2005 · 278 · 13610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.12.106 ↗
12. Kamins · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 222010.1063/1.1361096 ↗
13. Kamins · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 156210.1063/1.1635994 ↗
14. Portavoce · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2004 · 69 · 15541610.1103/PhysRevB.69.155416 ↗
15. Tong · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 08110410.1063/1.1929068 ↗
16. Sustersic · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 18310310.1063/1.3114377 ↗
17. Scappucci · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 260010.1039/c3nr34258a ↗
18. Sun · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. · 2010 · 16 · 12410.1109/JSTQE.2009.2027445 ↗
19. Zhang · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1548710.1039/C9NR00798A ↗
20. Zipoli · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 19190810.1063/1.2926683 ↗
21. Oliva-Chatelain · AIMS Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 3 · 110.3934/matersci.2016.1.1 ↗
22. Oliva-Chatelain · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 173310.1039/C5NR04978D ↗
23. Medeiros-Ribeiro · Science · 1998 · 279 · 35310.1126/science.279.5349.353 ↗
24. Osten · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 45010.1103/PhysRevLett.69.450 ↗
25. Wang · Nanotechnology · 2017 · 28 · 11570110.1088/1361-6528/aa5b3d ↗
26. Valakh · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 14190910.1063/1.3383241 ↗
27. Perova · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 03350210.1063/1.3536508 ↗
28. Pezzoli · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2008 · 11 · 27910.1016/j.mssp.2008.09.012 ↗
29. Dashiell · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 226110.1063/1.1405148 ↗
30. Boucaud · Photonics Res. · 2013 · 1 · 10210.1364/PRJ.1.000102 ↗
31. Fan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 18310610.1063/1.4831750 ↗
32. Geiger · Front. Mater. · 2015 · 2 · 5210.3389/fmats.2015.00052 ↗
33. Gaubas · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2007 · 154 · H23110.1149/1.2429031 ↗
34. Tsybeskov · Proc. IEEE · 2009 · 97 · 128410.1109/JPROC.2009.2020711 ↗
35. Grydlik · ACS Photonics · 2016 · 3 · 29810.1021/acsphotonics.5b00671 ↗
36. Wan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 176310.1063/1.1356454 ↗
37. Zhou · Opt. Express · 2019 · 27 · 2217310.1364/OE.27.022173 ↗
38. Smith · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2014 · 89 · 03530610.1103/PhysRevB.89.035306 ↗
39. El Kurdi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 01371010.1063/1.3279307 ↗
40. Brehm · New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 06302110.1088/1367-2630/11/6/063021 ↗