Interfacial electron transfer in heterojunction nanofibers for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Efficient catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) are critical to the progress of electrochemical devices for clean energy conversion and storage. Although heterogeneous electrocatalysts have superior activity, it is a great challenge to elucidate electron transfer at surface catalytic sites and intrinsic mechanisms. Herein, we demonstrate a new type of heterostructure electrocatalyst in which Sr0.9Ce0.05Fe0.95Ru0.05O3 fibers are hybridized with in situ grown RuO2 nanoparticles (SCFR-RuO2). We investigate its unique structure, electron transfer mechanisms related to the highly OER activity by combining experimental and theoretical calculations. Remarkably, SCFR-RuO2 shows an optimized OER overpotential of 295 mV at 10 mA cm-2. The promoted electron transfer and OER kinetics are ascribed to the coupling of electronic effects at the SCFR-RuO2 heterostructure. A strong triangular relationship among overpotential-Tafel slope-work function is proposed to be a potential descriptor of OER activity in SCFR-RuO2. These insights provide guidelines for tuning the OER performance via modified work functions in perovskite electrocatalysts.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center of Nanomaterials for Renewable Energy, State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Yu · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2021 · 61 · 2
2. Zhang · Small · 2021 · 17 · e210012910.1002/smll.202100129 ↗
3. Wang · Appl. Catal., B · 2022 · 302 · 12083810.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120838 ↗
4. Tang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2020 · 401 · 12608210.1016/j.cej.2020.126082 ↗
5. Cai · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 11 · 210014110.1002/aenm.202100141 ↗
6. Yu · Adv. Mater. · 2021 · 33 · e200710010.1002/adma.202007100 ↗
7. Wei · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · e180629610.1002/adma.201806296 ↗
8. Huang · Matter · 2019 · 1 · 149410.1016/j.matt.2019.09.011 ↗
9. Yu · ACS Catal. · 2019 · 9 · 997310.1021/acscatal.9b02457 ↗
10. Tang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2016 · 4 · 683110.1039/C5TA09530A ↗
11. Jiang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 1243410.1021/jacs.8b05206 ↗
12. Hwang · Science · 2017 · 358 · 75110.1126/science.aam7092 ↗
13. Ni · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 2694410.1039/C9TA09916F ↗
14. Pi · Nano Energy · 2021 · 88 · 10625110.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106251 ↗
15. Guo · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 414110.1021/acsnano.9b08904 ↗
16. Kim · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 8 · 170277410.1002/aenm.201702774 ↗
17. Yan · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 160645910.1002/adma.201606459 ↗
18. Meng · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 1145210.1021/ja505186m ↗
19. Fan · Joule · 2021 · 5 · 322110.1016/j.joule.2021.10.002 ↗
20. Li · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 1439810.1021/acscatal.0c03554 ↗
21. Kousi · Small · 2021 · 17 · 200647910.1002/smll.202006479 ↗
22. Jo · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 285 · 11982810.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119828 ↗
23. Myung · Nature · 2016 · 537 · 52810.1038/nature19090 ↗
24. Lee · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 10 · 190369310.1002/aenm.201903693 ↗
25. Cali · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 3744410.1021/acsami.0c08928 ↗
26. van Deelen · Nat. Catal. · 2019 · 2 · 95510.1038/s41929-019-0364-x ↗
27. Fu · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 418 · 12942210.1016/j.cej.2021.129422 ↗
28. Song · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 298 · 12048810.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120488 ↗
29. Shannon · Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Cryst. Phys., Diffr., Theor. Gen. Crystallogr. · 1976 · 32 · 75110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
30. Dang · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2021 · 14 · 543310.1039/D1EE02380B ↗
31. Gao · Nano Energy · 2016 · 27 · 49910.1016/j.nanoen.2016.07.013 ↗
32. Jiang · ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2018 · 6 · 1199910.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02288 ↗
33. Tran · Nano Energy · 2019 · 59 · 21610.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.050 ↗
34. Tanaka · ACS Catal. · 2013 · 3 · 188610.1021/cs400433r ↗
35. Song · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · e190697910.1002/adma.201906979 ↗
36. Zhu · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 169110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04457 ↗
37. Wang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2019 · 58 · 231610.1002/anie.201812545 ↗
38. Yuan · ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 120810.1021/acsenergylett.7b00223 ↗
39. Wen · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 11 · 210235310.1002/aenm.202102353 ↗
40. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 58210.1039/C9TA06309A ↗
41. Yu · Microporous Mesoporous Mater. · 2018 · 256 · 1010.1016/j.micromeso.2017.07.048 ↗
42. Zhang · RSC Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 5213010.1039/C4RA09290B ↗
43. Zhou · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2021 · 31 · 210206610.1002/adfm.202102066 ↗
44. Wang · Small · 2019 · 15 · e180488610.1002/smll.201804886 ↗
45. Sun · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 908610.1021/acscatal.0c01273 ↗
46. Zhao · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 4 · 79210.1038/s41578-019-0152-x ↗
47. Cui · Chem. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 761810.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02453 ↗
48. Wen · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2021 · 143 · 648210.1021/jacs.1c00384 ↗
49. Zhao · J. Energy Chem. · 2022 · 69 · 33010.1016/j.jechem.2022.01.030 ↗
50. Wang · J. Energy Chem. · 2021 · 54 · 51010.1016/j.jechem.2020.06.042 ↗
51. Bak · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2022 · 15 · 61010.1039/D1EE01826D ↗
52. He · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2020 · 59 · 692910.1002/anie.202001681 ↗
53. He · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 298 · 12052810.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120528 ↗