journal article·2026-02-25Open access

Sulfonylimide-Based Single-Ion-Conducting Porous Organic Polymer Electrolytes for Enhanced Performance of Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Pin-Jyun Chen, Jaturon Kumchompoo, Bo-Lin Chen, Yun-Chen Chuang, Bei-Chun Liao, Chia-Chen Li, Jyh-Tsung Lee

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The development of solid-state electrolytes with high ionic conductivity and interfacial stability is vital for next-generation lithium-ion batteries. Concentration polarization in conventional electrolytes accelerates solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) growth, thereby limiting cycle life and reliability. Here, we report a lithium sulfonylimide-based single-ion-conducting porous organic polymer (Li-SSP) electrolyte designed to suppress anion mobility and enhance Li + transport. The Li-SSP was synthesized via Sonogashira coupling of 4-bromo- N -((4-aminophenyl)sulfonyl)benzenesulfonamide with 1,3,5-triethynylbenzene. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed its chemical structure, while Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis revealed coexisting mesoporous and microporous architectures with a high surface area of 271 m 2 g –1 . The immobilized anionic groups in the porous framework provide continuous Li + conduction pathways, effectively reducing concentration polarization and improving electrochemical stability. The lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI)/poly(vinylidene fluoride- co -hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP)/Li-SSP composite electrolyte exhibits a high ionic conductivity of 4.04 × 10 –4 S cm –1 at 30 °C and a high Li + transference number of 0.70, significantly higher than that of LiTFSI/PVDF-HFP electrolytes (0.18). A Li||Li symmetric cell demonstrates stable Li plating/stripping for over 400 h with low overpotential, confirming excellent interfacial compatibility. A LiFePO 4 half-cell with the Li-SSP composite electrolyte delivers high capacities of 148.1 mAh g –1 at 0.2 C and 86.7 mAh g –1 at 5 C, along with 96.1% capacity retention after 300 cycles at 0.5 C. Scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses further confirm the formation of thinner and chemically stable CEI films, resulting in reduced interfacial resistance. These results highlight that rational design of Li-SSP electrolytes enables high Li + transference, robust interfacial stability, and extended cycle life, offering a promising pathway toward safe and durable solid-state lithium-ion batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

National Sun Yat-sen University

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology

Thammasat University

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

National Tsing Hua University

Department of Medicinal and Applied Chemistry

Kaohsiung Medical University

Funding

National Science and Technology Council

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.01710.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.017 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.F03122if10.1149/2.F03122if ↗
3. 10.1126/sciadv.aas982010.1126/sciadv.aas9820 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41578-021-00320-010.1038/s41578-021-00320-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.00710.1016/j.joule.2022.02.007 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.10446010.1016/j.ensm.2025.104460 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.00910.1016/j.joule.2018.07.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.00910.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.009 ↗
9. 10.34133/energymatadv.004110.34133/energymatadv.0041 ↗
10. 10.1039/D4YA00542B10.1039/D4YA00542B ↗
11. 10.1149/1.277996210.1149/1.2779962 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.07610.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.076 ↗
13. 10.1039/c0cs00081g10.1039/c0cs00081g ↗
14. 10.1039/D2SC03313E10.1039/D2SC03313E ↗
15. 10.1039/D1SC04023E10.1039/D1SC04023E ↗
16. 10.1039/C9TA11178F10.1039/C9TA11178F ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20200383610.1002/aenm.202003836 ↗
18. 10.1002/celc.20170038910.1002/celc.201700389 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-022-30788-510.1038/s41467-022-30788-5 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20230830910.1002/anie.202308309 ↗
21. 10.1038/srep1445810.1038/srep14458 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0146710.1021/acsaem.3c01467 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0094210.1021/acsaem.2c00942 ↗
24. 10.1039/D1MA00771H10.1039/D1MA00771H ↗
25. 10.1016/j.enchem.2022.10007310.1016/j.enchem.2022.100073 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja409421d10.1021/ja409421d ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20180554010.1002/anie.201805540 ↗
28. 10.1007/s40820-024-01499-x10.1007/s40820-024-01499-x ↗
29. 10.1002/smll.20230281810.1002/smll.202302818 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.2c1581010.1021/acsami.2c15810 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.4c0928710.1021/acsami.4c09287 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.12365510.1016/j.memsci.2024.123655 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.10984810.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109848 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20240400810.1002/aenm.202404008 ↗
35. 10.1002/anie.20150901410.1002/anie.201509014 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0540510.1021/acsnano.3c05405 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.01.27310.1016/j.jcis.2025.01.273 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.1c1577110.1021/acsami.1c15771 ↗
39. 10.1021/ja01588a01910.1021/ja01588a019 ↗
40. 10.1016/0371-1951(64)80114-410.1016/0371-1951(64)80114-4 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22798010.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227980 ↗
42. 10.1039/D1RA07393A10.1039/D1RA07393A ↗
43. 10.3390/ijms2211593510.3390/ijms22115935 ↗
44. 10.1039/C4PY00647J10.1039/C4PY00647J ↗
45. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c0164710.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c01647 ↗
46. 10.1149/2.090311jes10.1149/2.090311jes ↗
47. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.13710.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.137 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.4c2059710.1021/acsami.4c20597 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23611510.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.236115 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13606010.1016/j.electacta.2020.136060 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.est.2024.11421510.1016/j.est.2024.114215 ↗
52. 10.1002/ente.20210084110.1002/ente.202100841 ↗
53. 10.1002/ente.20220054710.1002/ente.202200547 ↗