Morphology-Driven 99m Tc Extraction from Molybdenum Disulfide Nanomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
The radionuclide 99m Tc, obtained as a decay product of 99 Mo from a 99 Mo/ 99m Tc generator, is extensively used as a diagnostic agent in nuclear medicine. Presently, high specific activity 99 Mo is predominantly produced in nuclear reactors as a byproduct from 235 U fission. However, this approach generates large amounts of nuclear waste and also faces challenges due to the decommissioning of aging research reactors. Alternative production routes using 98 Mo or 100 Mo as target materials have gained attention, but they inevitably result in low specific activity 99 Mo. Additionally, the limited adsorption capacity of the aluminum oxide, the conventional sorbent in the 99 Mo/ 99m Tc generator, restricts its use with low specific activity 99 Mo. We therefore propose to use molybdenum-based nanomaterials functioning as both target as well as generator material for the selective extraction of 99m Tc. By circumventing the necessity for sorbent material, we greatly increase the amount of Mo in the generator itself such that the low specific activity is no longer an issue. The ability to selectively extract 99m Tc while keeping the nanomaterial intact allows for re-irradiation, making the process recyclable. We have synthesized MoS 2 nanomaterials with distinct morphologies─nanoflowers, nanotubes, calcinated nanotubes, and nanodispersed sheets─and evaluated their properties. The material morphology significantly influenced the physicochemical properties, consequently impacting the 99m Tc extraction efficiencies. Among these materials, nanodispersed sheets, having the highest surface area (124 ± 35 m 2 /g), exhibited superior performance, achieving 12% 99m Tc extraction in methylethylketone (MEK) with negligible Mo contamination. These nanodispersed sheets also demonstrated excellent structural stability over multiple irradiation–extraction cycles, paving the way for a recyclable and cost-effective 99 Mo/ 99m Tc generator.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications · Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies · Hemophilia Treatment and Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Radiation Science and Technology
Delft University of Technology
Funding
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. IHME, Global Burden of Disease , 2024. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-number-of-deaths-by-cause.
2. 10.3390/ijms2309502310.3390/ijms23095023 ↗
3. 10.17226/2356310.17226/23563 ↗
4. 10.3389/fchem.2022.92625810.3389/fchem.2022.926258 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.net.2024.04.00810.1016/j.net.2024.04.008 ↗
6. 10.1007/s42452-020-03524-110.1007/s42452-020-03524-1 ↗
7. 10.3389/fchem.2022.92625810.3389/fchem.2022.926258 ↗
8. Abrams D. N. · 2013
9. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.01.00410.1016/j.apradiso.2008.01.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/b978-0-323-06538-2.00014-710.1016/b978-0-323-06538-2.00014-7 ↗
11. National Academies of Sciences and Medicine and Radiation Studies Board · 2018
12. Uranium E. · 2009
13. Lyra M. · Hell. J. Nucl. Med. · 2011 · 14 · 49
14. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.02.08510.1016/j.apradiso.2008.02.085 ↗
15. 10.1365/s10337-010-1754-z10.1365/s10337-010-1754-z ↗
16. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.03.01010.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.03.010 ↗
17. 10.1080/01496395.2014.90559610.1080/01496395.2014.905596 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12121810.1016/j.seppur.2022.121218 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15134010.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151340 ↗
20. 10.1016/0883-2889(87)90230-910.1016/0883-2889(87)90230-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00320-X10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00320-X ↗
22. 10.1166/jnn.2008.28010.1166/jnn.2008.280 ↗
23. Lee J. S. · 2007
24. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.11.00110.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.11.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.12210.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.122 ↗
26. 10.46813/2019-124-14910.46813/2019-124-149 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.micrna.2023.20774210.1016/j.micrna.2023.207742 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2021.10007310.1016/j.mtsust.2021.100073 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14796310.1016/j.cej.2023.147963 ↗
30. 10.3390/en1415458610.3390/en14154586 ↗
31. 10.1039/D0NH00465K10.1039/D0NH00465K ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.8b1865910.1021/acsami.8b18659 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.00910.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.009 ↗
34. 10.1039/C4RA14026E10.1039/C4RA14026E ↗
35. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0061110.1021/acsaem.2c00611 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.02.10310.1016/j.matlet.2013.02.103 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20130412010.1002/adma.201304120 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.04610.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.046 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.06610.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.066 ↗
40. 10.1021/nn100393710.1021/nn1003937 ↗
41. 10.1021/nl403661s10.1021/nl403661s ↗
42. 10.1073/pnas.050284810210.1073/pnas.0502848102 ↗
43. 10.1080/0001873690010130710.1080/00018736900101307 ↗
44. Gelezunas V. L. · J. Nucl. Med. Technol. · 1975 · 3 · 204
45. 10.1007/BF0251968510.1007/BF02519685 ↗
46. Catasus J. D. · Cienc. Nucleus · 2012 · 26
47. 10.1038/ncomms1067210.1038/ncomms10672 ↗
48. 10.1088/1742-6596/1739/1/01205210.1088/1742-6596/1739/1/012052 ↗
49. 10.1039/C6RA26264C10.1039/C6RA26264C ↗
50. Tuli, J. K. Thermal Neutron Capture Gamma-Rays ; United States, 1982 http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:14785562.10.2172/6236163 ↗
51. 10.1088/1402-4896/ac9c9f10.1088/1402-4896/ac9c9f ↗
52. 10.48550/arXiv.1806.0282910.48550/arXiv.1806.02829 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10512-013-9710-210.1007/s10512-013-9710-2 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.04.02210.1016/j.apradiso.2016.04.022 ↗
55. 10.7567/1882-0786/ab18b510.7567/1882-0786/ab18b5 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41598-023-42757-z10.1038/s41598-023-42757-z ↗
57. 10.1007/s00604-019-3678-010.1007/s00604-019-3678-0 ↗
58. Abramoff M. D. · Biophotonics Int. · 2004 · 11 · 36