Engineering Electrospun Nanostructured Coatings on Macroscopic Particles
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrospinning is widely used in industrial applications to produce coatings with different structures and improved physicochemical properties such as mechanical strength, corrosion resistance, and permeability. Electrospinning is commonly used for coating planar surfaces as opposed to coating nonplanar surfaces, such as macroscopic spheroidal substrates, which remains challenging. Herein, we engineered electrospun coatings on macroscopic particles (i.e., urea granules, steel balls, glass beads, natural zeolite) using biocompatible polymers (i.e., biodegradable beeswax and polycaprolactone). The morphology of the coatings was tuned to afford different architectures including beads, a mixture of beads and fibers, and fibers by changing the instrument operating and solution conditions. Urea granules were chosen as a model substrate to assess the release properties and potential application of the coatings as controlled-release fertilizers. The mechanical properties, hydrophobicity, water vapor permeability, and urea release rate of the coatings were studied. Notably, compared to traditionally prepared spray coatings, the engineered electrospun coatings displayed highly uniform coating coverage to the entirety of the particle surface, a lower water vapor permeability of 0.08 × 10 –7 g m h –1 m –2 Pa –1 (versus 0.13 × 10 –7 g m h –1 m –2 Pa –1, corresponding to a reduction of 38%) and a prolonged release of urea from 12 to 26 days.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering
The University of Melbourne
ARC Research Hub for Smart Fertilisers
Funding
Australian Research Council · University of Melbourne
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/coatings1403025610.3390/coatings14030256 ↗
2. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0460510.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04605 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0169610.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01696 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20241334910.1002/adma.202413349 ↗
5. 10.3390/ijms2504207110.3390/ijms25042071 ↗
6. 10.1080/10408398.2022.210530010.1080/10408398.2022.2105300 ↗
7. 10.1002/sus2.22810.1002/sus2.228 ↗
8. 10.1002/adem.20200145610.1002/adem.202001456 ↗
9. 10.3390/bioengineering603007810.3390/bioengineering6030078 ↗
10. Zoka L. · 2018
11. 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.10526310.1016/j.jddst.2023.105263 ↗
12. 10.1177/004051751454214110.1177/0040517514542141 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1605067410.3390/polym16050674 ↗
14. 10.3390/nano1208136910.3390/nano12081369 ↗
15. Sarkın, A. S.; Sağlam, Ş.; Ekren, N. Investigation of Light Transmittance of Coatings Containing SiO2 and TiO2 Nanoparticles Made by Electrospinning Technique ; International Symposium on Energy Management and Sustainability; Springer, 2022; pp 753–762.10.1007/978-3-031-30171-1_80 ↗
16. 10.1364/OE.25.02059810.1364/OE.25.020598 ↗
17. Kondawar S. B. · 2021 · 11910.1007/978-3-030-79979-3_5 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.1c1605210.1021/acsami.1c16052 ↗
19. Wu X.-F. · 2021 · 315
20. 10.1007/s10570-024-05956-z10.1007/s10570-024-05956-z ↗
21. 10.1080/00914037.2024.233517310.1080/00914037.2024.2335173 ↗
22. Mwiiri F. K. · 2020 · 5310.1016/B978-0-12-817776-1.00003-1 ↗
23. 10.1002/adem.20230129710.1002/adem.202301297 ↗
24. 10.3390/polym1613193410.3390/polym16131934 ↗
25. 10.1002/pat.630910.1002/pat.6309 ↗
26. Liu Y. · 2024 · 7110.1002/9783527841479.ch5 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0226310.1021/acsanm.3c02263 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.microc.2024.11032610.1016/j.microc.2024.110326 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.10928210.1016/j.cclet.2023.109282 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13688610.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136886 ↗
31. Götz A. · 2022 · 8 · 364
32. Wang, B.; Zhou, W.; Chang, M. W.; Ahmad, Z.; Li, J. S. Impact of substrate geometry on electrospun fiber deposition and alignment J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017; Vol. 134 10.1002/app.44823.10.1002/app.44823 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1503053310.3390/polym15030533 ↗
34. 10.1063/5.013194710.1063/5.0131947 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11095-006-9934-010.1007/s11095-006-9934-0 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apt.2010.04.00910.1016/j.apt.2010.04.009 ↗
37. Briner, G. D.; Romero, E.; Nuila, C. E. Extended wax composition and composite panels prepared therewith. US Patent US20120214012A1, 2012.
38. 10.1002/adfm.20211194210.1002/adfm.202111942 ↗
39. ASTM-International. ASTM E96/E96M– 22a, Standard Test Methods for Gravimetric Determination of Water Vapor Transmission Rate of Materials ; ASTM-International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2023.
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.026 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.10126910.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101269 ↗
42. Maurice, H. Method and Apparatus For Accumulating Cross-aligned Fiber In An Electrospinning Device. US Patent US10640888B1, 2020.
43. 10.3390/polym1303046410.3390/polym13030464 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41598-020-80729-910.1038/s41598-020-80729-9 ↗
45. 10.1163/016942410X50806410.1163/016942410X508064 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11242-024-02087-810.1007/s11242-024-02087-8 ↗
47. 10.1039/C9RA01331H10.1039/C9RA01331H ↗
48. 10.2478/pjct-2018-006310.2478/pjct-2018-0063 ↗