Percolation by Brush Architecture: A Pathway toward Soft Electronics
Source abstract
Abstract
Achieving simultaneous tissue-mimetic mechanical properties and electrical conductivity within a single molecular system remains a major challenge. Typically, the design of stretchable and flexible electronic materials requires a trade-off between mechanical compliance and electronic performance. Herein, we employ a computationally driven materials design strategy to synthesize polydimethylsiloxane bottlebrush graft copolymers with precisely controlled fractions of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), where the grafts serve both as physical cross-links between bottlebrush strands and as conductive elements. Thin films cast from solution reveal percolation of P3HT needle-like crystals, corroborated by transmission electron microscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering, and computer simulations. These films exhibit a distinctive combination of properties, including a low elastic modulus (∼1–100 kPa) and an electrical conductivity of up to ∼10 –2 S/cm. Materials that simultaneously combine tissue-like mechanics with electronic functionality hold strong potential for wearable and implantable devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
Institut de Sciences des Matériaux de Mulhouse-IS2M, CNRS, UMR 7361, 15 Rue Jean Starcky, F-68057 Mulhouse, France
Funding
Russian Science Foundation · Division of Materials Research
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature2367310.1038/nature23673 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aar530810.1126/science.aar5308 ↗
3. 10.1039/D2MH00844K10.1039/D2MH00844K ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.06410.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.064 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat450810.1038/nmat4508 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.1c1286010.1021/acsami.1c12860 ↗
7. 10.1021/acspolymersau.1c0003410.1021/acspolymersau.1c00034 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-023-36214-810.1038/s41467-023-36214-8 ↗
9. 10.1038/pj.2012.19810.1038/pj.2012.198 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms270710.1038/ncomms2707 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-022-30361-010.1038/s41467-022-30361-0 ↗
12. 10.1002/admt.20190058610.1002/admt.201900586 ↗
13. 10.1126/sciadv.160207610.1126/sciadv.1602076 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.aah449610.1126/science.aah4496 ↗
15. 10.1021/acscentsci.4c0154110.1021/acscentsci.4c01541 ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.abm246910.1126/sciadv.abm2469 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-021-23962-810.1038/s41467-021-23962-8 ↗
18. 10.1021/ma202473310.1021/ma2024733 ↗
19. 10.1002/pola.2450410.1002/pola.24504 ↗
20. 10.1107/S160057671500430610.1107/S1600576715004306 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.141210.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1412 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.393310.1103/PhysRevB.30.3933 ↗
24. Torquato S. · 2002 · 1610.1007/978-1-4757-6355-3 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb06897.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb06897.x ↗
26. Balay S. · 1997 · 16310.1007/978-1-4612-1986-6_8 ↗
27. Balay S. · 201910.2172/1577437 ↗
28. Balay S. · 2025
29. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0166910.1021/acs.macromol.9b01669 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0258210.1021/acsnano.5b02582 ↗
31. 10.1021/jp201044b10.1021/jp201044b ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c0000610.1021/acs.macromol.2c00006 ↗
33. 10.1021/la061276910.1021/la0612769 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0251210.1021/acs.macromol.0c02512 ↗
35. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b0121610.1021/acscentsci.9b01216 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.02.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.02.004 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.03.01210.1016/j.solmat.2010.03.012 ↗