Dehydrogenation vs Apparent Hydrogenation: Unraveling the Mechanisms of He and O 2 Plasma Etching on Colloidal Nanocrystal Films
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Removing organic ligands from colloidal nanoparticles is critical for fabricating solid-state devices, yet accurately quantifying this removal remains a significant analytical challenge. Here, we establish a robust and accessible method for this quantification by calibrating Raman spectroscopy against precise ion beam analysis (IBA) for nanoparticle assemblies (CNAs) processed by helium (He) and oxygen (O 2 ) plasmas. We demonstrate that the calibration curves are remarkably independent of plasma power and pressure, depending critically only on the choice of feed gas. He plasma induces rapid dehydrogenation and cross-linking, evidenced by a much faster decrease in the C–H Raman signal relative to the actual carbon loss. Conversely, O 2 plasma leads to a surprising “apparent hydrogenation”, where the carbon backbone is removed significantly faster than the C–H signal diminishes. This counterintuitive effect is explained by a serial mechanism of oxidative fragmentation; β-scission cleaves the alkyl chains, and subsequent stabilization steps enrich the remaining film with hydrogen-rich methyl-terminated fragments, while carbon is efficiently removed as volatile CO. This work provides calibrated functions that enable the rapid determination of absolute carbon content in processed CNAs using simple Raman spectroscopy with uncertainties of ∼8% for O 2 and ∼12% for He plasma, offering a vital tool for both process diagnostics and fundamental studies of plasma–matter interactions in colloidal nanocrystal films.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena · Plasma Applications and Diagnostics · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science & Engineering
Iowa State University of Science and Technology
Instituto de Física
Universidade de São Paulo
Department of Chemistry
Ames Laboratory
United States Department of Energy
Michigan Ion Beam Laboratory
University of Michigan
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability
University of Parma
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences · Semiconductor Research Corporation
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nn506223h10.1021/nn506223h ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20120206910.1002/adma.201202069 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja037539s10.1021/ja037539s ↗
4. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199902)11:2<165::AID-ADMA165>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199902)11:2<165::AID-ADMA165>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.11904310.1063/1.119043 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.126050110.1126/science.1260501 ↗
7. 10.1021/cm504716s10.1021/cm504716s ↗
8. 10.1116/1.57986810.1116/1.579868 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.04410.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.044 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11051-021-05223-310.1007/s11051-021-05223-3 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5CC07348K10.1039/C5CC07348K ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-017-02267-910.1038/s41467-017-02267-9 ↗
13. 10.1039/D4NR01458H10.1039/D4NR01458H ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20160187310.1002/adma.201601873 ↗
15. Shaw, S.; Tian, X. C.; Silva, T. F.; Bobbitt, J.; Rodrigues, C.; Naab, F.; Smith, E. A.; Cademartiri, L. Manuscript in preparation, 2017.
16. 10.1002/smll.20050020610.1002/smll.200500206 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0276910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02769 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20160187210.1002/adma.201601872 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0276910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02769 ↗
20. 10.1039/C8CP06890A10.1039/C8CP06890A ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20060046010.1002/adma.200600460 ↗
22. 10.1201/978149871083110.1201/9781498710831 ↗
23. 10.1039/C6AN01167E10.1039/C6AN01167E ↗
24. 10.1063/1.500256910.1063/1.5002569 ↗
25. 10.1021/nl061702a10.1021/nl061702a ↗
26. 10.1021/ac970553110.1021/ac9705531 ↗
27. 10.1116/1.58010110.1116/1.580101 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.07.04810.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.07.048 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0524510.1021/acsomega.3c05245 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.10511910.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105119 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41545-024-00397-410.1038/s41545-024-00397-4 ↗
32. 10.1021/ja034258b10.1021/ja034258b ↗
33. Mohapatra, P.; Cademartiri, L. Manuscript in preparation, 2017.
34. 10.1107/S205322961500300910.1107/S2053229615003009 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.08.04010.1016/j.apcata.2007.08.040 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0209510.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02095 ↗
37. 10.1002/app.1967.07011080910.1002/app.1967.070110809 ↗
38. 10.1039/D2RA05901K10.1039/D2RA05901K ↗
39. 10.1021/ed058p12510.1021/ed058p125 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0025010.1021/acs.accounts.8b00250 ↗
41. 10.1246/cl.17083410.1246/cl.170834 ↗
42. 10.1021/jp991960e10.1021/jp991960e ↗
43. Ellington, B. R. Probing the Mechanisms of Aldehyde Decarbonylation Using Radical Clock Substrate Analogues. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2016.
44. 10.1021/cr990123610.1021/cr9901236 ↗
45. 10.1351/pac19906209169910.1351/pac199062091699 ↗