Optical Determination of Hydrofluoric Acid Content in Lithium-Based Electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries powering electric vehicles can contain up to ∼100 liters of electrolyte solution. This solution typically consists of LiPF 6 salt dissolved in a mixture of organic carbonates such as ethylene carbonate and diethyl carbonate. LiPF 6 decomposes upon exposure to water vapor or other protic impurities, leading to the formation of up to 3 equivalents of hydrofluoric acid (HF) per molecule of decomposed salt. HF is a deadly and volatile substance that is corrosive to cell and battery components. Here, we describe an all-optical method that can report on the concentration of HF in LiPF 6 -based electrolytes. The method is based on a specially designed fluorescent dye incorporated in the working electrolyte. The dye response to HF is quantified so that photographic imaging or even visual inspection can be used to indicate the HF concentration in the electrolyte. The method is, moreover, compatible, in principle, with in situ reporting of HF levels during cell assembly and operation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics
University of Alberta
Quantum and Nanotechnologies Research Centre
National Research Council Canada
Wacker Chair of Macromolecular Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85747 Garching bei München, Germany
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 1, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
Department of Chemistry
Funding
University of Alberta · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Alberta Innovates · CUSL lab, Canada Foundation for Innovation
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12206310.1016/j.seppur.2022.122063 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.etran.2022.10016910.1016/j.etran.2022.100169 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10980010.1016/j.est.2023.109800 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2018.11.00210.1016/j.pnsc.2018.11.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.03210.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.032 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.01710.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.017 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.08410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.084 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00960-010.1016/S0378-7753(01)00960-0 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.135315810.1149/1.1353158 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.12110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.121 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00746-710.1016/S0378-7753(01)00746-7 ↗
12. O.H.S.A. (OSHA), in: Safety and Health Information Bulletin SHIB 06-20-2019 , 2019.
13. 10.1038/s41598-017-09784-z10.1038/s41598-017-09784-z ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.02710.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.027 ↗
15. in: P. UK (Ed.) Motor Trade Articles, https://www.prosol.co.uk/motor-trade-articles/hydrofluoric-acid-the-chemical-hazard-hiding-in-electric-and-hybrid-vehicle-batteries/.
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22736310.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227363 ↗
17. 10.1016/bs.arnmr.2018.12.00310.1016/bs.arnmr.2018.12.003 ↗
18. 10.1149/2.005312eel10.1149/2.005312eel ↗
19. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.02610.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.026 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00706-023-03163-310.1007/s00706-023-03163-3 ↗
21. 10.3390/separations602002610.3390/separations6020026 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.aca.2011.11.05610.1016/j.aca.2011.11.056 ↗
23. 10.3390/batteries1012044310.3390/batteries10120443 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41377-018-0102-110.1038/s41377-018-0102-1 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.0201902jes10.1149/2.0201902jes ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0208010.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02080 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.10134910.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101349 ↗
28. 10.3390/nano907105510.3390/nano9071055 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00248-210.1016/S0038-092X(03)00248-2 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41929-018-0047-z10.1038/s41929-018-0047-z ↗
31. 10.1021/acsaelm.5c0074410.1021/acsaelm.5c00744 ↗
32. 10.1007/s40820-024-01374-910.1007/s40820-024-01374-9 ↗
33. 10.3390/batteries501003010.3390/batteries5010030 ↗