Understanding the Structural Characteristics of Modified Ceramic Hollow Fiber Oxygen Transport Membranes through In Silico Tomography Simulation Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Design and development of integrated membrane reactor systems are gaining attention as a sustainable solution capable of performing multiple functions in a single reactor. Membrane reactors made of mixed ionic-electronic conduction materials dosing pure O to the reactions can be exploited for various catalytic processes. In this case, micro- and macrostructures of the membrane surface play a significant role in the permeation performance of membranes, and understanding these parameters prior to scaling up to modules is imperative. Here, 3D X-ray tomography imaging, a versatile nondestructive instrumental technique, is used in understanding the structural behavior of the membrane walls at different structural alignments, leading to anticipation of fouling areas upon assembling membrane reactors. La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3−δ hollow fiber membranes are fabricated by the phase inversion method and further modified by the optimized acid etching technique. In silico simulations on different morphologies before and after surface modifications are carried out under varying flow rates at nonambient temperatures to mimic real experimental conditions. Critical parameters such as gas velocity, pressure exerted on cavity walls, and strain, dictating structural integrity of the fibers under experimental conditions, were evaluated. As a result of the assessment, the surface-modified structural morphology with finger-like cavities initiating from the inner wall of the membrane was found to be robust. Increase in the pore size, nonuniform pore size distribution, and irregular and interdigitated cavities formed in outer fingered membranes after multiple surface treatments led to an ∼5 fold increase in the average pressure exerted at the cavity walls when compared to inner fingered membranes. Strain profile generated for inner fingered membranes shows homogeneous distribution of strain for the applied stress throughout the 3D geometry of the membrane. This detailed structural analysis of the membrane will help in building a more robust and efficient system for scale-up applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Catalysis and Inorganic Chemistry Division
CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)
Polymer Science and Engineering Division
Shell India Markets Pvt. Ltd.
Funding
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Shell Global Solutions International
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:102263660670510.1023/A:1022636606705 ↗
2. 10.3390/catal1106069110.3390/catal11060691 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20046202410.1002/anie.200462024 ↗
4. 10.1002/aic.69047022010.1002/aic.690470220 ↗
5. 10.1039/b203168j10.1039/b203168j ↗
6. 10.1002/aic.1551810.1002/aic.15518 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.03.02310.1016/j.catcom.2006.03.023 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.03310.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.033 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.07910.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.079 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00222-010.1016/S0920-5861(03)00222-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00710-410.1016/S0167-2738(00)00710-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00591-310.1016/S0376-7388(00)00591-3 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.07410.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.074 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-0286(96)80052-010.1016/S1359-0286(96)80052-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0272-8842(03)00030-010.1016/S0272-8842(03)00030-0 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.18110.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.181 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.02410.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.024 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00640-910.1016/S0011-9164(02)00640-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00503-X10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00503-X ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.11.00310.1016/j.cjche.2015.11.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.01210.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.012 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17283810.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172838 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11718010.1016/j.memsci.2019.117180 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41586-021-03492-510.1038/s41586-021-03492-5 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11938010.1016/j.memsci.2021.119380 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.00210.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.002 ↗
27. 10.1149/06602.0021ecst10.1149/06602.0021ecst ↗
28. Niehoff, P.; Schulze-Küppers, F.; Baumann, S.; Vaßen, R.; Buchkremer, H.P.; Meulenberg, W. Manufacturing and Performance of Supported BSCF-Membranes for Oxygen Separation. In Proceedings of Developments in Strategic Materials and Computational Design V: A Collection of Papers Presented at the 38th International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites, Daytona Beach, Florida, January 27–31, 2014; Gyekenyesi, A.; Halbig, M.; Kriven, W.M.; Zhu, D.; Moon, K.I.; Hwang, T.; Wang, J.; Lewinsohn, C.; Zhou, Y., Eds. ACS: 2014; Vol. 35, pp 323–335.10.1002/9781119040293.ch28 ↗
29. 10.1039/D0CP02144J10.1039/D0CP02144J ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.05.04510.1016/j.cattod.2020.05.045 ↗
31. 10.1111/ijac.1396710.1111/ijac.13967 ↗
32. ASTM. C1684-08 Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2002; pp 1–21.
33. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.04710.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.047 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.05010.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.050 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.4213010.1002/app.42130 ↗
36. Mulder J. · 2013