A Healthier Peer Review Process Would Improve Diversity

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUECommentNEXTA Healthier Peer Review Process Would Improve DiversityMorteza Mahmoudi*Morteza MahmoudiDepartment of Radiology and Precision Health Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States*Email: [email protected]More by Morteza Mahmoudihttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-9684Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 37, 40987–40989Publication Date (Web):September 1, 2020Publication History Published online1 September 2020Published inissue 16 September 2020https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c11528https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c11528article-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views3285Altmetric-Citations9LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (543 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Interfaces,Materials,Modification Get e-Alerts