journal article·2024-09-18Open access

Cellular Output and Physicochemical Properties of the Membrane-Derived Vesicles Depend on Chemical Stimulants

Dilip Shrestha, Yusuf Bahasoan, Christian Eggeling

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 37

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Synthetic liposomes are widely used as drug delivery vehicles in biomedical treatments, such as for mRNA-based antiviral vaccines like those recently developed against SARS-CoV-2. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are naturally produced by cells, have emerged as a next-generation delivery system. However, key questions regarding their origin within cells remain unresolved. In this regard, plasma membrane vesicles (PMVs), which are essentially produced from the cellular plasma membrane (PM), present a promising alternative. Unfortunately, their properties relevant to biomedical applications have not be extensively studied. Therefore, we conducted a thorough investigation of the methods used in the production of PMVs. By leveraging advanced fluorescence techniques in microscopy and flow cytometry, we demonstrated a strong dependence of the physicochemical attributes of PMVs on the chemicals used during their production. Following established protocols employing chemicals such as paraformaldehyde (PFA), N- ethylmaleimide (NEM) or dl -dithiothreitol (DTT) and by developing a modified NEM-based method that involved a hypotonic shock step, we generated PMVs from THP-1 CD1d cells. We systematically compared key parameters such as vesicle output, their size distribution, vesicular content analysis, vesicular membrane lipid organization and the mobility of a transmembrane protein. Our results revealed distinct trends: PMVs isolated using NEM-based protocols closely resembled natural vesicles, whereas PFA induced significant molecular cross-linking, leading to notable changes in the biophysical properties of the vesicles. Furthermore, our novel NEM protocol enhanced the efficiency of PMV production. In conclusion, our study highlights the unique characteristics of chemically produced PMVs and offers insights into their potentially diverse yet valuable biological functions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extracellular vesicles in disease · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

MRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, U.K.

Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.

Department of Biophysical Imaging, Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technologies e.V., member of the Leibniz Centre for Photonics in Infection Research (LPI), Albert- Einstein Strasse 9, 07745 Jena, Germany

Institute of Applied Optics and Biophysics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Max-Wien Platz 1, 07743 Jena, Germany

Jena Center for Soft Matter (JCSM), Philosophenweg 7, 07743 Jena, Germany

Funding

Medical Research Council · Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung · Freistaat Th?ringen · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Wellcome Trust · University of Oxford · Wolfson Foundation · Photonics Research Germany

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.11575110.1016/j.jpba.2023.115751 ↗
2. 10.5114/bta.2022.12070910.5114/bta.2022.120709 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.10355310.1016/j.jddst.2022.103553 ↗
4. 10.1002/adhm.20230031910.1002/adhm.202300319 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.01410.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.014 ↗
6. 10.1038/s12276-024-01201-610.1038/s12276-024-01201-6 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.061135710410.1073/pnas.0611357104 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.110599610810.1073/pnas.1105996108 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.090898710610.1073/pnas.0908987106 ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.101618410710.1073/pnas.1016184107 ↗
11. 10.1091/mbc.e16-07-053610.1091/mbc.e16-07-0536 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.1c0640410.1021/acsami.1c06404 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.7b0750010.1021/acsami.7b07500 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0537710.1021/acsnano.8b05377 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.9b1122310.1021/acsami.9b11223 ↗
16. 10.1038/nprot.2012.05910.1038/nprot.2012.059 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.2c1309510.1021/acsami.2c13095 ↗
18. 10.1038/s42003-023-04859-210.1038/s42003-023-04859-2 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0159610.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01596 ↗
20. 10.1038/s42004-019-0224-210.1038/s42004-019-0224-2 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00216-012-6232-z10.1007/s00216-012-6232-z ↗
22. 10.1016/S0090-6980(74)80104-810.1016/S0090-6980(74)80104-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/0003-9861(88)90407-910.1016/0003-9861(88)90407-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.01310.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.013 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.10015510.1016/j.jlr.2021.100155 ↗
26. 10.1002/1873-3468.1415310.1002/1873-3468.14153 ↗
27. 10.1002/advs.20210210910.1002/advs.202102109 ↗
28. 10.1002/cphc.20140279410.1002/cphc.201402794 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0355910.1021/acs.analchem.0c03559 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41596-019-0127-910.1038/s41596-019-0127-9 ↗
31. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.0036210.3389/fimmu.2015.00362 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.131005011010.1073/pnas.1310050110 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.071014510410.1073/pnas.0710145104 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ab.2018.07.01210.1016/j.ab.2018.07.012 ↗
35. 10.6028/jres.119.02710.6028/jres.119.027 ↗
36. 10.1021/ac301776j10.1021/ac301776j ↗
37. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00001.x10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00001.x ↗
38. Petrov E. · 2008 · 14510.1007/4243_2008_032 ↗
39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv68710.1093/bioinformatics/btv687 ↗
40. Macey M. G. · 2007 · 110.1007/978-1-59745-451-3 ↗
41. 10.1371/journal.pone.012118410.1371/journal.pone.0121184 ↗
42. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7346-0_1710.1007/978-1-4939-7346-0_17 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.micron.2022.10334110.1016/j.micron.2022.103341 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jim.2006.09.01310.1016/j.jim.2006.09.013 ↗
45. 10.1002/cyto.b.2177310.1002/cyto.b.21773 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.03.01310.1016/j.bbamem.2018.03.013 ↗
47. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.0101110.3389/fimmu.2018.01011 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c0006810.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00068 ↗
49. 10.3390/cells1103035110.3390/cells11030351 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.mex.2015.08.00210.1016/j.mex.2015.08.002 ↗
51. 10.1093/jmcb/mjt01110.1093/jmcb/mjt011 ↗
52. 10.1083/jcb.20160202810.1083/jcb.201602028 ↗
53. 10.1016/0301-4622(77)85009-610.1016/0301-4622(77)85009-6 ↗
54. 10.1055/s-0030-126703410.1055/s-0030-1267034 ↗
55. 10.1073/pnas.191009711610.1073/pnas.1910097116 ↗
56. 10.1073/pnas.151453011310.1073/pnas.1514530113 ↗
57. 10.1371/journal.pone.012393010.1371/journal.pone.0123930 ↗
58. 10.1039/D0SM00404A10.1039/D0SM00404A ↗
59. 10.1038/s41598-017-01731-210.1038/s41598-017-01731-2 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jim.2021.11317010.1016/j.jim.2021.113170 ↗
61. 10.1073/pnas.181749811610.1073/pnas.1817498116 ↗
62. 10.3389/fcell.2020.0075610.3389/fcell.2020.00756 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.12.00410.1016/j.bbamem.2012.12.004 ↗
64. 10.1039/C9RA00818G10.1039/C9RA00818G ↗
65. 10.1126/sciadv.adg327710.1126/sciadv.adg3277 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.09.01210.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.09.012 ↗
67. 10.1073/pnas.201435211710.1073/pnas.2014352117 ↗
68. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0227810.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02278 ↗
69. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0258210.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02582 ↗