journal article·2024-07-31Open access

Enhanced Degradability of Thiol–Ene Composites through the Inclusion of Isosorbide-Based Polycarbonates

Jorge San Jacinto Garcia, Natalia Sanz del Olmo, Daniel J. Hutchinson, Michael Malkoch

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 30

Abstract

Open reduction internal fixation metal plates and screws remain the established standard-of-care for complex fracture fixation. They, however, have drawbacks such as limited customization, soft-tissue adhesions, and a lack of degradation. Bone cements and composites are being developed as alternative fixation techniques in order to overcome these issues. One such composite is a strong, stiff, and shapeable hydroxyapatite-containing material consisting of 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-trione (TATO) monomers, which cures through high energy visible light-induced thiol-ene coupling (TEC) chemistry. Previous human cadaver and in vivo studies have shown that patches of this composite provide sufficient fixation for healing bone fractures; however, the composite lacks degradability. To promote degradation through hydrolysis, new allyl-functionalized isosorbide-based polycarbonates have been added into the composite formulation, and their impact has been evaluated. Three polycarbonates with allyl functionalities, located at the termini (aPC1 and aPC2) or in the backbone (aPC3), were synthesized. Composites containing 1, 3, and 5 wt % of aPCs 1-3 were formulated and evaluated with regard to mechanical properties, water absorption, hydrolytic degradation, and cytotoxicity. Allyl-functionalized polycaprolactone (aPCL) was synthesized and used as a comparison. When integrated into the composite, aPC3 significantly impacted the material's properties, with the 5 wt % aPC3 formulation showing a significant increase in degradation of 469%, relative to the formulation not containing any aPCs after 8 weeks' immersion in PBS, along with a modest decrease in modulus of 28% to 4.01 (0.3) GPa. Osteosyntheses combining the aPC3 3 and 5 wt % formulations with screws on synthetic bones with ostectomies matched or outperformed the ones made with the previously studied neat composite with regard to bending stiffness and strength in four-point monotonic bending before and after immersion in PBS. The favorable mechanical properties, increased degradation, and nontoxic characteristics of the materials present aPC3 as a promising additive for the TATO composite formulations. This combination resulted in stiff composites with long-term degradation that are suitable for bone fracture repair.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Synthesis and properties of polymers · Flame retardant materials and properties · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Royal Institute of Technology, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, KTH, Teknikringen 56-58, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council · Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00172-010.1016/S2666-7568(21)00172-0 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.1c1743410.1021/acsami.1c17434 ↗
3. 10.1177/00031348100760082010.1177/000313481007600820 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ccc.2016.08.00910.1016/j.ccc.2016.08.009 ↗
5. 10.1177/155894471985568410.1177/1558944719855684 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0749-0690(02)00076-910.1016/S0749-0690(02)00076-9 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80157-310.1016/S0363-5023(98)80157-3 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00402-015-2155-410.1007/s00402-015-2155-4 ↗
9. 10.1080/2000656X.2017.131326110.1080/2000656X.2017.1313261 ↗
10. 10.1002/adhm.20180046710.1002/adhm.201800467 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00402-013-1842-210.1007/s00402-013-1842-2 ↗
12. 10.1186/s13018-023-04012-z10.1186/s13018-023-04012-z ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1415414910.3390/ma14154149 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20180496610.1002/adma.201804966 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20210518710.1002/adfm.202105187 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0224610.1021/acsapm.3c02246 ↗
17. 10.1002/jor.110009050710.1002/jor.1100090507 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00011-210.1016/S0021-9290(01)00011-2 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.5304610.1002/app.53046 ↗
20. 10.1177/175319342093247710.1177/1753193420932477 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.11.00310.1016/j.jhsg.2019.11.003 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41598-023-35706-310.1038/s41598-023-35706-3 ↗
23. 10.3390/polym1304059910.3390/polym13040599 ↗
24. 10.3390/ijms2316908310.3390/ijms23169083 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1323556010.3390/ma13235560 ↗
26. 10.3390/polym1421456610.3390/polym14214566 ↗
27. 10.1080/00986445.2018.148630210.1080/00986445.2018.1486302 ↗
28. 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00192-110.1016/S8756-3282(99)00192-1 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.03110.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.031 ↗
30. 10.3389/fmats.2021.68370610.3389/fmats.2021.683706 ↗
31. 10.3390/ma1416440310.3390/ma14164403 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0401510.1021/acsomega.1c04015 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1316271810.3390/polym13162718 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.10061610.1016/j.mtla.2020.100616 ↗
35. 10.1023/A:100758291195810.1023/A:1007582911958 ↗
36. 10.1039/C2CS35268K10.1039/C2CS35268K ↗
37. Bendler J. T. · 199910.1201/9781482273694 ↗
38. 10.1002/mabi.20070010610.1002/mabi.200700106 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.01410.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.014 ↗
40. 10.1097/00003086-200110001-0002410.1097/00003086-200110001-00024 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.024 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.001 ↗
43. 10.1039/C8PY00256H10.1039/C8PY00256H ↗
44. 10.1039/C6SC05582F10.1039/C6SC05582F ↗
45. 10.1039/C5PY01659B10.1039/C5PY01659B ↗
46. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.00710.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 ↗
47. International Organization for Standardization · 2009
48. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.05210.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.052 ↗
49. 10.1007/s00396-011-2476-y10.1007/s00396-011-2476-y ↗