Controlling Nucleation Sites for Metal Oxide Film Growth on Glassy Carbon via Electrochemical Preoxidation
Source abstract
Abstract
Coating electrode materials with metal oxide thin films can improve the performance of electrocatalysts and charge storage materials. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) enables the deposition of conformal, uniform films on a wide range of electrodes; however, an even film depends on the availability of nucleation sites directly on the electrode surface. Here, we show that the electrochemical oxidation of glassy carbon electrodes prior to the deposition of alumina thin films by ALD leads to more uniform electrochemically passivating films. Cyclic voltammetry (CV), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) demonstrate that film uniformity increases with the increasing potential of preoxidation until 2.50 V versus Ag/AgCl, at which point the films are fully passivating and appear continuous by SEM. Further increasing the potential of preoxidation leads to uniform but less consistently passivating alumina films. These findings show that electrochemical preoxidation is a rapid and readily tunable strategy for controlling oxygenic nucleation sites and therefore the growth of thin metal oxide films on glassy carbon electrodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
Funding
Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Basic Energy Sciences · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsami.6b1357110.1021/acsami.6b13571 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11998-011-9327-010.1007/s11998-011-9327-0 ↗
3. 10.1002/open.20200035210.1002/open.202000352 ↗
4. 10.1039/C5TA03742E10.1039/C5TA03742E ↗
5. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0631810.1021/acsomega.2c06318 ↗
6. 10.1039/C4TA01562B10.1039/C4TA01562B ↗
7. 10.1039/C5CP01912E10.1039/C5CP01912E ↗
8. 10.1021/cr900056b10.1021/cr900056b ↗
9. 10.1063/1.194072710.1063/1.1940727 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.10233710.1063/1.102337 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0040-6090(96)08934-110.1016/S0040-6090(96)08934-1 ↗
12. 10.1021/jp953676310.1021/jp9536763 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.05.12610.1016/j.cplett.2006.05.126 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.152281110.1063/1.1522811 ↗
15. 10.1021/cr068076m10.1021/cr068076m ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.13310.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.133 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b0043910.1021/acs.accounts.9b00439 ↗
18. 10.1021/ac00053a02310.1021/ac00053a023 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0022-0728(99)00197-710.1016/S0022-0728(99)00197-7 ↗
20. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac971710.1149/1945-7111/ac9717 ↗
21. 10.1021/cm101110810.1021/cm1011108 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp202202x10.1021/jp202202x ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.5b0216710.1021/acsami.5b02167 ↗
24. 10.1021/la503232m10.1021/la503232m ↗
25. 10.1021/jp048038b10.1021/jp048038b ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.07.01310.1016/j.cattod.2017.07.013 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00228-110.1016/S0008-6223(00)00228-1 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.205608610.1149/1.2056086 ↗
29. 10.1149/1.139358210.1149/1.1393582 ↗
30. 10.1021/ac00165a02210.1021/ac00165a022 ↗
31. 10.1021/ac00266a00510.1021/ac00266a005 ↗
32. 10.1016/0008-6223(86)90156-910.1016/0008-6223(86)90156-9 ↗
33. 10.1021/ja00293a00710.1021/ja00293a007 ↗
34. Moulder J. F. · 1995
35. 10.1021/ac960492r10.1021/ac960492r ↗
36. 10.1021/ac00272a05410.1021/ac00272a054 ↗
37. 10.1039/dc982740011310.1039/dc9827400113 ↗
38. Pourbaix, M. Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions; Pergamon Press: New York, 1966; pp 168–176.
39. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2022.10033210.1016/j.apsadv.2022.100332 ↗
40. 10.1149/1.209665010.1149/1.2096650 ↗