journal article·2021-07-14

Bioactive Glass Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Composites Prompt a Crystallographic Lophelia Atoll-Like Skeletal Microarchitecture Actuating Periosteal Cambium

Lekha Rethi, Luke Lu, Van Tin Huynh, Yankuba B. Manga, Lekshmi Rethi, Chinmaya Mutalik, Chih-Hwa Chen, Er-Yuan Chuang

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 27
Publisher page

Abstract

The touchstone for bone replacing or anchoring trauma implants, besides resorption, includes functional ankylosis at a fixation point and replacement by viable functional neo-bone tissues. These parameters redefined the concept of “resorbability” as “bioresorbability.” Interference screws are the most commonly used resorbable anchoring implants for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (surgery). Over the years, the bioresorbable screw fixation armamentarium has amplified countless choices, but instability and postimplantation complications have raised concerns about its reliability and efficacy. Owing to this interest, in this work, bioactive glass fiber-reinforced plastic (BGFP) composites with (BGFPnb5) and without (BGFP5) niobicoxide composing multiplexed network modifiers are reported as bioresorbable bone-anchoring substitutes. These synergistically designed composites have a fabricated structure of continuous, unidirectional BG fibers reinforced in an epoxy resin matrix using “melt-drawing and microfabrication” technology. The BGFP microarchitecture is comprised of multiplexed oxide components that influence bioactive response in a distinctive lophelia atoll-like apatite formation. Furthermore, it assists in the proliferation, adherence, and migration of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. It also exhibits superior physicochemical characteristics such as surface roughness, hydrophilic exposure, distinctive flexural strength, and bioresorption. Thus, it induces restorative bone osseointegration and osteoconduction and actuates periosteum function. In addition, the BGFP influences the reduction of DH5-α Escherichia coli in suspension culture, demonstrating potential antibacterial efficacy. In conclusion, the BGFP composite therapeutic efficacy demonstrates distinctive material characteristics aiding in bone regeneration and restoration that could serve as a pioneer in orthopedic regenerative medicine.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

International Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan

Taiwan Fiber Optics, Inc., Taipei 10451, Taiwan

International Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan

School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan

School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan

Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University—Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan

Research Center of Biomedical Device, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan

Cell Physiology and Molecular Image Research Center, Taipei Medical University—Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei 116, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/s40902-015-0003-710.1186/s40902-015-0003-7 ↗
2. 10.4103/0975-5950.12764510.4103/0975-5950.127645 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.06710.1016/j.joms.2015.03.067 ↗
4. 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2016.460110.17148/IJIREEICE.2016.4601 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.00310.1016/j.dental.2015.01.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.08.02010.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.08.020 ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.b.3089810.1002/jbm.b.30898 ↗
8. 10.1002/hed.2337010.1002/hed.23370 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00701-015-2363-210.1007/s00701-015-2363-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.03010.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.030 ↗
11. 10.1097/SCS.000000000000282810.1097/SCS.0000000000002828 ↗
12. 10.2485/jhtb.26.23710.2485/jhtb.26.237 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.02310.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
16. 10.1111/jace.1322210.1111/jace.13222 ↗
17. 10.1080/23337931.2016.123918210.1080/23337931.2016.1239182 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.36110.1016/j.dental.2014.08.361 ↗
19. 10.1089/1076327036069697810.1089/10763270360696978 ↗
20. 10.2215/CJN.0415120610.2215/CJN.04151206 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10439-016-1675-610.1007/s10439-016-1675-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.01010.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.10989510.1016/j.msec.2019.109895 ↗
25. 10.1515/bglass-2017-000510.1515/bglass-2017-0005 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1323556010.3390/ma13235560 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.009 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.04110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.041 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.02710.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.027 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.140 ↗
32. 10.1007/s12666-008-0070-x10.1007/s12666-008-0070-x ↗
33. 10.1088/1748-6041/1/1/00310.1088/1748-6041/1/1/003 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10856-007-3164-910.1007/s10856-007-3164-9 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma1102032610.3390/ma11020326 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.06.01710.1016/j.ibiod.2018.06.017 ↗
37. Wunner F. · 2017