journal article·2025-10-13

Design, Synthesis, and Screening of COFs for CO 2 Adsorption by Gaussian Process

Jian Guan, Zhenhua Dai, Hang Zhou, Zejiang Huang, Xuelu Wang, Wenlong Zhang, Xiaohong Guan, Mengshuai Liu, Haitao Lv, Shifa Zhong

Publisher page

Abstract

Effective CO 2 capture requires careful design of Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs). Current computational approaches often rely solely on simulated properties, neglecting critical chemical and synthetic factors that determine real-world COF performance. We present an integrated computational-experimental framework combining machine learning with experimental validation. Our study analyzes 240 unique COFs (617 samples) with experimentally measured CO 2 adsorption capacities across varied synthesis conditions. Gaussian Process and CatBoost models were developed to predict CO 2 adsorption by simultaneously considering chemical structures, synthesis parameters, and measurement protocols. The GP model demonstrates improved generalization and uncertainty quantification compared to CatBoost. SHAP analysis reveals the model’s focus on COF type and synthesis conditions. Using a database of 181 building blocks, we generated 5557 COF structures with synthesis condition recommendations based on experimental similarity. Experimental validation confirmed the predictions for three synthesized COFs, demonstrating the framework’s practical utility for COF design and optimization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Environmental Science, Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences

East China Normal University

Physics Department & Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science

Geogia Tech Shenzhen Institute

Tianjin University

State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering

Qingdao University of Science and Technology

Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Treatment and Resource Reuse of Hainan Province, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Hainan Normal University

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D2CS00465H10.1039/D2CS00465H ↗
2. 10.1039/C4EE02636E10.1039/C4EE02636E ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20150500410.1002/adma.201505004 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20170022910.1002/adma.201700229 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.09.02010.1016/j.jechem.2024.09.020 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20242281410.1002/anie.202422814 ↗
7. 10.1002/smll.20250286710.1002/smll.202502867 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms1232510.1038/ncomms12325 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20170555310.1002/adfm.201705553 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.112041110.1126/science.1120411 ↗
11. 10.1002/aic.1785610.1002/aic.17856 ↗
12. 10.1039/D3MH01396K10.1039/D3MH01396K ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0138510.1021/acs.iecr.2c01385 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20230159410.1002/adfm.202301594 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.4c1667810.1021/jacs.4c16678 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11426-020-9836-x10.1007/s11426-020-9836-x ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.est.5c0039010.1021/acs.est.5c00390 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0055010.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00550 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0437310.1021/acs.est.1c04373 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.gee.2022.12.00110.1016/j.gee.2022.12.001 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20170430310.1002/adma.201704303 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.2c1710910.1021/acsami.2c17109 ↗
23. 10.48550/arXiv.2506.0827410.48550/arXiv.2506.08274 ↗
24. 10.1186/s13321-020-00456-110.1186/s13321-020-00456-1 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.est.3c0219810.1021/acs.est.3c02198 ↗
26. 10.1002/aic.1818210.1002/aic.18182 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.asej.2025.10351210.1016/j.asej.2025.103512 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10462-024-11040-610.1007/s10462-024-11040-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cie.2021.10787210.1016/j.cie.2021.107872 ↗
30. 10.3390/su1203083010.3390/su12030830 ↗
31. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad668610.1088/1361-6501/ad6686 ↗
32. 10.1039/D3QI01065A10.1039/D3QI01065A ↗
33. 10.1186/s40537-020-00369-810.1186/s40537-020-00369-8 ↗
34. Lundberg, S. M.; Lee, S.I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions . In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc.: Long Beach, California, USA, 2017; pp 4768–4777.
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0323010.1021/acs.chemmater.3c03230 ↗
36. 10.1186/s13321-015-0069-310.1186/s13321-015-0069-3 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.10976010.1016/j.cclet.2024.109760 ↗
38. 10.48550/arXiv.2006.1056210.48550/arXiv.2006.10562 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.03310.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.033 ↗
40. 10.1002/anie.20180717310.1002/anie.201807173 ↗
41. 10.1039/C9TA02573A10.1039/C9TA02573A ↗
42. 10.1002/adma.20241579910.1002/adma.202415799 ↗
43. 10.1021/jacs.5b0430010.1021/jacs.5b04300 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.8b2186710.1021/acsami.8b21867 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.3c1669010.1021/acsami.3c16690 ↗
46. 10.1039/D2QI00336H10.1039/D2QI00336H ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jssc.2021.12257710.1016/j.jssc.2021.122577 ↗
48. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0417610.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04176 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.11241910.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112419 ↗
50. 10.1021/jacs.1c1239210.1021/jacs.1c12392 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsami.2c1822610.1021/acsami.2c18226 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13279510.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132795 ↗
53. 10.1002/admi.20200150710.1002/admi.202001507 ↗