journal article·2024-08-14

Uncovering the Interfacial Strengthening Mechanisms of α-Mg/Mg2Sn/β-Li Interfaces Using First-Principle Calculations and HAADF-STEM

Guangyuan Tian, Junsheng Wang, Shuo Wang, Chengpeng Xue, Hui Su, Xinghai Yang, Quan Li, Zhihao Yang, Yingchun Tian, Zhifei Yan

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 32
Publisher page

Abstract

Previously, we reported our new invention of an ultralight (ρ = 1.61 g/cm 3 ) and super high modulus ( E = 64.5 GPa) Mg–Li–Al–Zn–Mn–Gd–Y–Sn (LAZWMVT) alloy. Surprisingly, the minor additions of Sn contribute to significant strength and stiffness increases. In this study, we found that Mg 2 Sn was not only the simple precipitate but also acted as the glue to bind the α-Mg/β-Li interface in a rather complicated way. To explore its mechanism, we have performed first-principle calculations and HAADF-STEM experiments on the interfacial structures. It was found that the interfacial structural models of α-Mg/β-Li, α-Mg/Mg 2 Sn, and β-Li/Mg 2 Sn composite interfaces prefer to form α-Mg/Mg 2 Sn/β-Li ternary composite structures due to the stable formation enthalpy (Δ H: −1.95 eV/atom). Meanwhile, the interface cleavage energy and critical cleavage stress show that Mg 2 Sn contribute to the interfacial bond strength better than the β-Li/α-Mg phase bond strength (σ b (β-Li/Mg 2 Sn): 0.82 GPa > σ b (α-Mg/Mg 2 Sn): 0.78 GPa > σ b (β-Li/α-Mg): 0.62 GPa). Based on the interfacial electronic structure analysis, α-Mg/Mg 2 Sn and β-Li/Mg 2 Sn were found to have a denser charge distribution and larger charge transfer at the interface, forming stronger chemical bonds. Additionally, according to the crystal orbital Hamiltonian population analysis, the bonding strength of the Mg–Sn atom pair was 2.61 eV, which was higher than the Mg–Li bond strength (0.39 eV). The effect of the Mg 2 Sn phase on the stability and interfacial bonding strength of the alloying system was dominated by the formation of stronger and more stable Mg–Sn metal covalent bonds, which mainly originated from the contribution of the Mg 3p-Sn 5p orbital bonding states.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science & Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, No.5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China

Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China

China North Industries Group, No. 52 Research Institute, Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014030, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangxi Joint Fund

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14327210.1016/j.msea.2022.143272 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00170-007-1279-210.1007/s00170-007-1279-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10562310.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105623 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14402210.1016/j.msea.2022.144022 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.05710.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.057 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.20510.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.205 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.03010.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.030 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12613-022-2572-710.1007/s12613-022-2572-7 ↗
9. 10.1179/1743280414Y.000000004410.1179/1743280414Y.0000000044 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.35010.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.350 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.07.02910.1016/j.jmst.2020.07.029 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15583610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155836 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.06710.1016/j.msea.2015.10.067 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.05910.1016/j.msea.2017.03.059 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.04710.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.047 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65550-410.1016/S1003-6326(21)65550-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.05710.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.057 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.07610.1016/j.msea.2014.10.076 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.05510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.055 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.07.06610.1016/j.jallcom.2007.07.066 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.16610.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.166 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.01360610.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.013606 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11215410.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112154 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.calphad.2023.10255610.1016/j.calphad.2023.102556 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16391510.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163915 ↗
26. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.06510.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.065 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.9b1492310.1021/acsami.9b14923 ↗
29. 10.1021/am508944s10.1021/am508944s ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11519110.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115191 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.0c0648910.1021/acsami.0c06489 ↗
33. 10.1021/j100135a01410.1021/j100135a014 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.03.03610.1016/j.commatsci.2015.03.036 ↗
35. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16449110.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164491 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.01210.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.012 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.183510.1103/PhysRevB.28.1835 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17329110.1016/j.jallcom.2023.173291 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.17411810.1103/PhysRevB.74.174118 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.17411710.1103/PhysRevB.75.174117 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.03210.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.032 ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0287295110.1007/BF02872951 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.intermet.2008.11.00510.1016/j.intermet.2008.11.005 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10853-021-05894-210.1007/s10853-021-05894-2 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.05910.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.059 ↗
47. 10.1002/adts.20217001110.1002/adts.202170011 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.20542110.1103/PhysRevB.73.205421 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.004 ↗
50. 10.1039/C9TA12600G10.1039/C9TA12600G ↗
51. 10.3390/cryst805022510.3390/cryst8050225 ↗