journal article·2022-05-11

Li-Ion Permeability of Holey Graphene in Solid State Batteries: A Particle Dynamics Study

Elizabeth A. Barrios, April A. Rains, Yi Lin, Ji Su, John W. Connell, Rocco P. Viggiano, Donald A. Dornbusch, James J. Wu, Vesselin Yamakov

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Lithium (Li)-ion permeability of holey graphene (hG) for use as an electrically conducting scaffold in solid-state battery electrodes is explored through the means of a particle dynamics simulation model. While carbon materials do not typically exhibit Li-ion conductivity, the unique structural motif of hG, which consists of two-dimensional nanosheets with arrays of through-thickness holes, may present an opportunity for Li-ion conductors (i.e., solid electrolyte (SE) particles) to make contacts through the holes. In our model, the SE is presented as a system of hard elastic spheres conductive to Li-ions. The SE spheres are in contact with each other through compression between two plane current collectors. One hG layer is inserted between the current collectors and parallel to them. Randomly distributed circular holes in the hG allow for contact between the SE particles on both sides of the hG layer. By solving the Li-ion conducting network formed between the electrodes through the contact points of all the particles, the overall conductivity of the system was calculated as a function of SE particle size and the size and number of the hG holes (i.e., hG porosity). A critical ratio of around 4 between the SE particle size and the pore size was found. Below this critical value, the hG layer becomes practically transparent for Li-ions. This study helps to guide the design of highly efficient solid-state electrode composition and architectures using hG as a unique electrically conducting scaffold.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Graphene research and applications · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, Virginia 23666, United States

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35808, United States

University of Georgia, Department of Chemistry, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · National Institute of Aerospace

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20200468910.1002/adma.202004689 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0137310.1021/acsenergylett.1c01373 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.01710.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.017 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13940610.1016/j.electacta.2021.139406 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0044910.1021/acscentsci.0c00449 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0064210.1021/acsenergylett.6b00642 ↗
7. 10.1080/21663831.2016.127104710.1080/21663831.2016.1271047 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.02810.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.028 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10476210.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104762 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0022710.1021/acsnano.7b00227 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.6b0995110.1021/acsami.6b09951 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0006610.1021/acsaem.9b00066 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13712910.1016/j.electacta.2020.137129 ↗
14. 10.1002/batt.20190005310.1002/batt.201900053 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0058210.1021/acsaem.0c00582 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0087210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00872 ↗
17. 10.1002/batt.20200020110.1002/batt.202000201 ↗
18. 10.1021/nn202710s10.1021/nn202710s ↗
19. 10.1021/nn502635y10.1021/nn502635y ↗
20. 10.1038/ncomms555410.1038/ncomms5554 ↗
21. Fraga Filho C. A. D. · 201910.1007/978-3-030-00773-7 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0385410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03854 ↗
23. Frenkel D. · 2002
24. Puttock, M. J.; Thwaite, E. G. Elastic Compression of Spheres and Cylinders at Point and Line Contact; National Standards Laboratory Technical Paper No. 25; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization: Australia, Melbourne, 1969.
25. 10.1063/1.32869310.1063/1.328693 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.44733410.1063/1.447334 ↗
27. McDonald, K. T. In Princeton University, Electrodynamics Problem Set 4; 1999; pp 21–26. See the following: https://physics.princeton.edu//~mcdonald/examples/ph501set4.pdf.
28. 10.1007/s10409-013-0070-x10.1007/s10409-013-0070-x ↗
29. 10.1002/ceat.20190050110.1002/ceat.201900501 ↗
30. 10.1371/journal.pone.005169510.1371/journal.pone.0051695 ↗
31. Balay, S.; Gropp, W.; McInnes, L. C.; Smith, B. F. PETSc, the portable extensible toolkit for scientific computation; Argonne National Laboratory, 1998.