journal article·2022-12-21Open access

Quantifying the Influence of Defects on Selectivity of Electrodes Encapsulated by Nanoscopic Silicon Oxide Overlayers

William D. H. Stinson, Kelly M. Brayton, Shane Ardo, A. Alec Talin, Daniel V. Esposito

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 50

Abstract

Encapsulation of electrocatalysts and photocatalysts with semipermeable nanoscopic oxide overlayers that exhibit selective transport properties is an attractive approach to achieve high redox selectivity. However, defects within the overlayers─such as pinholes, cracks, or particle inclusions─may facilitate local high rates of parasitic reactions by creating pathways for facile transport of undesired reactants to exposed active sites. Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) is an attractive method to determine the influence of defects on macroscopic performance metrics thanks to its ability to measure the relative rates of competing electrochemical reactions with high spatial resolution over the electrode. Here, we report the use of SECM to determine the influence of overlayer defects on the selectivity of silicon oxide (SiOx) encapsulated platinum thin-film electrocatalysts operated under conditions where two competing reactions─the hydrogen evolution and Fe(III) reduction reactions─can occur. After an SECM methodology is described to determine spatially resolved selectivity, representative selectivity maps are correlated with the location of defects that are characterized by optical, electron, and atomic force microscopies. This analysis reveals that certain types of defects in the oxide overlayer are responsible for ∼60–90% of the partial current density toward the undesired Fe(III) reduction reaction. By correcting for defect contributions to Fe(III) reduction rates, true Fe(III) permeability values for the SiOx overlayers were determined to be over an order of magnitude lower than permeabilities determined from analyses that ignore the presence of defects. Finally, different types of defects were studied revealing that defect morphology can have varying influence on both redox selectivity and calculated permeability. This work highlights the need for spatially resolved measurements to evaluate the performance of oxide-encapsulated catalysts and understand their performance limits.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Columbia Electrochemical Engineering Center, Lenfest Center for Sustainable Energy, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York10027, United States

Department of Chemistry, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California92697, United States

Materials Physics Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California94550, United States

Funding

Office of Defense Nuclear Security · Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy · National Science Foundation

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C7EE03639F10.1039/C7EE03639F ↗
2. 10.1039/C8CS00699G10.1039/C8CS00699G ↗
3. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.01910.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.019 ↗
4. 10.1039/c3ee40831k10.1039/c3ee40831k ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.8b0538210.1021/jacs.8b05382 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20060247310.1002/anie.200602473 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20170186110.1002/anie.201701861 ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.1c0355510.1021/jacs.1c03555 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0235910.1021/acsaem.0c02359 ↗
10. 10.1039/C4CY01301H10.1039/C4CY01301H ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20190926210.1002/adfm.201909262 ↗
12. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0266810.1021/acscatal.7b02668 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0290910.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02909 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.04510.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.045 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10066710.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100667 ↗
16. 10.1524/zpch.2008.542610.1524/zpch.2008.5426 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10853-009-3654-x10.1007/s10853-009-3654-x ↗
18. 10.1002/smtd.20210032210.1002/smtd.202100322 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0006710.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00067 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja044972910.1021/ja0449729 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.5b1025610.1021/jacs.5b10256 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.04.00610.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.04.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.06.01210.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.06.012 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp982088x10.1021/jp982088x ↗
25. 10.1149/1.222089710.1149/1.2220897 ↗
26. 10.1021/la980821610.1021/la9808216 ↗
27. 10.1021/j100044a03410.1021/j100044a034 ↗
28. 10.1039/D0SC04319B10.1039/D0SC04319B ↗
29. 10.3390/catal1105059410.3390/catal11050594 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10008-015-3028-z10.1007/s10008-015-3028-z ↗
31. 10.1007/s10800-019-01294-210.1007/s10800-019-01294-2 ↗
32. 10.1021/ja310632k10.1021/ja310632k ↗
33. 10.1038/s42004-020-00399-610.1038/s42004-020-00399-6 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja407395m10.1021/ja407395m ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.1c0618710.1021/acsami.1c06187 ↗
36. 10.1021/ja805055310.1021/ja8050553 ↗
37. 10.1039/c2cp40907k10.1039/c2cp40907k ↗
38. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2005.07.01210.1016/j.hydromet.2005.07.012 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0024610.1021/acsenergylett.1c00246 ↗
40. Aydin, F. S.; Sharma, S.; Zagalskaya, A.; Maiti, A.; Esposito; Daniel, V.; Ardo, S.; Pham, T. A.; Ogitsu, T.Transport of Redox Shuttles in Microporous Silicon Oxide Films: Mechanistic Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations, in press.
41. 10.1039/C8TA06969G10.1039/C8TA06969G ↗
42. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.01910.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.019 ↗
43. Esposito D. V. · 2022 · 167
44. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0337410.1021/acscatal.7b03374 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.15590110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.155901 ↗
46. 10.1109/23.81912310.1109/23.819123 ↗
47. 10.1021/j150579a01110.1021/j150579a011 ↗
48. 10.1021/cr068076m10.1021/cr068076m ↗