journal article·2021-12-01

Drastic Modulation of Molecular Packing and Intrinsic Dissolution Rates by Meniscus-Guided Coating of Extremely Confined Pharmaceutical Thin Films

Prapti Kafle, Rishabh Sanghavi, Azzaya Khasbaatar, Samdisha Punjani, Daniel W. Davies, Ying Diao

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 47
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanosizing has emerged as one of the most effective formulation strategies for enhancement of dissolution properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). In addition to enhancing the specific area of the dissolving solids, nanosizing can also capture and stabilize the metastable form of the API, which can further enhance the solubility by drastic modulation of surface energies. Herein, we employ meniscus-guided coating to fabricate nanothin films of three APIs that show anticancer properties and are poorly soluble:10-HCPT, SN-38, and amonafide. By modulating the coating speed, we systematically deposited the APIs in films ranging from ∼200 nm thickness to extreme confinement of ∼10 nm (<10 molecular layers). In all three APIs, we observe a general order-to-disorder transition with semicrystalline (10-HCPT and amonafide) or amorphous (SN-38) form of API solids trapped in thin films when the thickness decreases below a critical value of ∼25-30 nm. The existence of a critical thickness highlights the importance of nanoconfinement in tuning molecular packing. In the case of 10-HCPT, we demonstrate that the disordered form of the API occurs largely due to lack of incorporation of water molecules in thinner films below the critical thickness, thereby disrupting the three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network held by water molecules. We further developed a dissolution model that predicts variation of the intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) with API film thickness, which also closely matched with experimental results. We achieved drastic improvement in the IDR of ∼240% in 10-HCPT by decreasing film thickness alone. Further leveraging the order-to-disorder transition led to 2570% modulation of the IDR for amonafide. Our work demonstrates, for the first time, opportunities to largely modulate API dissolution by precisely controlling the dimensionality of thin films.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Crystallography and molecular interactions · Crystallization and Solubility Studies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana−Champaign, 600 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States

Beckman Institute, Molecular Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana−Champaign, 405 N Mathews Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States

Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana−Champaign, 104 South Goodwin Avenue MC-230, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States

Funding

American Association of University Women · Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apsb.2015.07.00310.1016/j.apsb.2015.07.003 ↗
2. 10.2147/ijn.s59510.2147/ijn.s595 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.05.00310.1016/j.addr.2007.05.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/s0928-0987(02)00251-810.1016/s0928-0987(02)00251-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.03.03810.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.03.038 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja908055y10.1021/ja908055y ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.8b0107410.1021/acsami.8b01074 ↗
8. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw775710.1126/sciadv.aaw7757 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20190978710.1002/adfm.201909787 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0140210.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01402 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.coche.2011.12.00110.1016/j.coche.2011.12.001 ↗
12. 10.5402/2012/43676310.5402/2012/436763 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.00310.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.02.00910.1016/j.drudis.2010.02.009 ↗
15. 10.1016/s0939-6411(99)00039-910.1016/s0939-6411(99)00039-9 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40199-018-00235-210.1007/s40199-018-00235-2 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0168610.1021/acs.cgd.7b01686 ↗
18. 10.1039/c3cs60234f10.1039/c3cs60234f ↗
19. 10.1021/cg800326a10.1021/cg800326a ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0163310.1021/acs.cgd.6b01633 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b0144510.1021/acs.cgd.5b01445 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.00810.1016/j.addr.2003.10.008 ↗
23. Brittain H. G. · 1999 · 95 · 427
24. 10.3390/molecules20101875910.3390/molecules201018759 ↗
25. 10.1208/s12249-010-9464-210.1208/s12249-010-9464-2 ↗
26. 10.4103/0975-7406.7213310.4103/0975-7406.72133 ↗
27. 10.1371/journal.pone.004074610.1371/journal.pone.0040746 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-017-00763-610.1038/s41467-017-00763-6 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-018-02833-910.1038/s41467-018-02833-9 ↗
30. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa9d7c10.1088/1361-6528/aa9d7c ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0415210.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04152 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.8b1379010.1021/acsami.8b13790 ↗
33. Ostwald W. · Z. Phys. Chem. · 1897 · 22 · 28910.1515/zpch-1897-2233 ↗
34. Mullin J. W. · 2001
35. 10.1038/nphys114810.1038/nphys1148 ↗
36. 10.1039/c3ob42213e10.1039/c3ob42213e ↗
37. 10.1107/S160053681001870210.1107/S1600536810018702 ↗
38. 10.1021/ja02086a00310.1021/ja02086a003 ↗
39. 10.1002/polb.2487510.1002/polb.24875 ↗
40. 10.1107/S090904951202201710.1107/S0909049512022017 ↗
41. 10.1107/S160057671500443410.1107/S1600576715004434 ↗
42. Bruker · 2014
43. Bruker · 2014
44. 10.1107/S205327331402637010.1107/S2053273314026370 ↗
45. 10.1107/S205322961402421810.1107/S2053229614024218 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.02.02210.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.02.022 ↗