Nanofibrillar Si Helices for Low-Stress, High-Capacity Li+ Anodes with Large Affine Deformations
Source abstract
Abstract
We report on the chemical lithiation of long microscale helices composed of densely packed amorphous silicon (aSi) nanofibrils, fabricated by glancing angle deposition (GLAD) through e-beam evaporation. In situ electron microscopy and companion finite element modeling demonstrate that the nanofibrillar structure of the aSi helices allows for 2 orders of magnitude faster effective rates for Li diffusion (D0 = 10–10 cm2/s) compared to solid aSi nanowires, while also averting fragmentation during lithiation. More importantly, it is shown that specific helical geometries can accommodate large, lithium-induced, volumetric expansions without shape distortion. A major advantage of the helical nanostructures is that the compressive force generated due to lithiation-induced expansion is an order of magnitude smaller than in straight nanocolumns that permanently buckle during lithiation. Thus, GLAD-fabricated films composed of dense periodic microscale helices with properly designed coil geometries are highly suitable for robust, high-capacity Li+ anodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.165242110.1149/1.1652421 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.02.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.02.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.01310.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.013 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.159691810.1149/1.1596918 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.138817810.1149/1.1388178 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.08.00810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.08.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.08410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.084 ↗
8. 10.1002/smll.20090038210.1002/smll.200900382 ↗
9. 10.1038/nnano.2007.41110.1038/nnano.2007.411 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl803632310.1021/nl8036323 ↗
11. 10.1002/ange.20060167610.1002/ange.200601676 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat272510.1038/nmat2725 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl201684d10.1021/nl201684d ↗
14. 10.1039/c1ee01918j10.1039/c1ee01918j ↗
15. 10.1021/nl302841y10.1021/nl302841y ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20100248710.1002/adfm.201002487 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.00810.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.008 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0252210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02522 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.03210.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.032 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.12510.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.125 ↗
21. 10.1116/1.276408210.1116/1.2764082 ↗
22. Taschuk M. T. · 2010
23. Zhao Y. · 2009 · 31
24. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/s0257-8972(03)00413-410.1016/s0257-8972(03)00413-4 ↗
26. 10.1016/s0257-8972(03)01162-910.1016/s0257-8972(03)01162-9 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.08.03610.1016/j.wear.2006.08.036 ↗
28. 10.1021/nn204476h10.1021/nn204476h ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0321602jes10.1149/2.0321602jes ↗
30. 10.1007/s10853-017-1750-x10.1007/s10853-017-1750-x ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.01710.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.017 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20120002410.1002/aenm.201200024 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.solener.2014.04.01210.1016/j.solener.2014.04.012 ↗
34. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04432.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04432.x ↗
35. 10.1063/1.493085610.1063/1.4930856 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.02010.1016/j.eml.2016.02.020 ↗
37. 10.1021/nl304450810.1021/nl3044508 ↗
38. 10.1021/nl200412p10.1021/nl200412p ↗
39. 10.1016/s0167-2738(00)00362-310.1016/s0167-2738(00)00362-3 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.12.01510.1016/j.ssi.2008.12.015 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.01710.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.017 ↗
42. 10.1134/s102319350604012410.1134/s1023193506040124 ↗
43. 10.1134/s102319350607003210.1134/s1023193506070032 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.07.00210.1016/j.jelechem.2006.07.002 ↗
45. 10.1021/nn305282d10.1021/nn305282d ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.11.03110.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.11.031 ↗
47. 10.1149/1.165242110.1149/1.1652421 ↗
48. 10.1149/1.240986210.1149/1.2409862 ↗
49. 10.1149/1.179053310.1149/1.1790533 ↗