journal article·2016-08-17

Interfacial Mode Interactions of Surface Plasmon Polaritons on Gold Nanodome Films

Woo Ri Ko, Jinlin Zhang, Hyeong-Ho Park, Junghyo Nah, Jae Yong Suh, Min Hyung Lee

Publisher page

Abstract

Hollow metallic nanodome structures were fabricated using anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) nanopores as deposition and sacrificial templates. Individual Au nanodomes inherit the unique shapes of the well-defined AAO membranes whose pedestal cells become square or hexagonal lattices with hemispheres in close proximity. Minimal contact between the hollow nanodomes and the glass substrate provide an identical dielectric medium across the film. The nanodome Au films support surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) of strong air-Au and weak Au-glass modes in the light transmission dispersions. The mode crossings of distinct SPPs exhibit characteristic energy gaps, which depend on the periodic geometries of the nanostructures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Chemistry, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Gyeonggi 17104, Korea

Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931, United States

Technology Development Division, Korea Advanced Nanofab Center (KANC), Suwon, Gyeonggi 16229, Korea

Department of Electrical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Kyung Hee University · Vice President for Research Office, Michigan Technological University

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.01110.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.011 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20040027110.1002/adma.200400271 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0193710.1038/nature01937 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl903423710.1021/nl9034237 ↗
5. 10.1039/c3nr02374e10.1039/c3nr02374e ↗
6. 10.1155/2015/56158610.1155/2015/561586 ↗
7. 10.1021/jp405125c10.1021/jp405125c ↗
8. 10.1021/jp300901810.1021/jp3009018 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.00210.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.002 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl203360210.1021/nl2033602 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5AN01782C10.1039/C5AN01782C ↗
12. 10.1021/jp203216k10.1021/jp203216k ↗
13. 10.1038/srep0466210.1038/srep04662 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/13/13530210.1088/0957-4484/23/13/135302 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0297710.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02977 ↗
16. 10.1088/0960-1317/13/5/33310.1088/0960-1317/13/5/333 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.08541510.1103/PhysRevB.67.085415 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.optcom.2003.07.03710.1016/j.optcom.2003.07.037 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat281010.1038/nmat2810 ↗
20. 10.1021/cr068126n10.1021/cr068126n ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.09010.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.090 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0040-6090(96)09440-010.1016/S0040-6090(96)09440-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/0022-3697(59)90199-410.1016/0022-3697(59)90199-4 ↗
24. 10.1021/nl025537k10.1021/nl025537k ↗
25. 10.1126/science.117465510.1126/science.1174655 ↗
26. 10.1021/nn500646j10.1021/nn500646j ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.10740110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.107401 ↗
28. 10.1364/OE.19.00658710.1364/OE.19.006587 ↗
29. 10.1119/1.347117710.1119/1.3471177 ↗