journal article·2009-02-25

Spatial Distribution of Malate Dehydrogenase in Chitosan Scaffolds

Georgianna L. Martin, Shelley D. Minteer, Michael J. Cooney

Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to study the spatial distribution of malate dehydrogenase immobilized within three-dimensional macroporous chitosan scaffolds. The scaffolds were fabricated from solutions of native and hydrophobically modified chitosan polymer through the process of thermally induced phase separation. The hydrophobically modified chitosan is proposed to possess amphiphilic micelles into which the enzyme can be encapsulated and retained. To test this theory, we applied the immobilization procedure of Klotzbach and co-workers [J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282 (1-2), 276-283] to solutions of fluorophore-tagged malate dehydrogenase in the presence of native and hydrophobically modified chitosan polymer and then tracked the distribution of enzymes in the resulting scaffolds using fluorescent microscopy. Results suggest that the modified chitosan does encapsulate the enzyme with a significant degree of retention and with altered distribution patterns, suggesting that hydrophobic modification of the chitosan polymer backbone does create amphiphilic regions that are capable of physically encapsulating and retaining enzymes. Commentary is also given on how this information can be correlated to enzyme activity and spatial distribution during immobilization processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, and Department of Chemistry, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri 63103

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Klotzbach T. · J. Membr. Sci. · 2006 · 282 · 27610.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.029 ↗
2. Minoofar P. N. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 265610.1021/ja045185e ↗
3. Bru R. · Biochem. J. · 1995 · 310 · 72110.1042/bj3100721 ↗
4. Callahan J. W. · Can. J. Biochem. · 1967 · 45 · 83910.1139/o67-094 ↗
5. Moore C. M. · Biomacromolecules · 2005 · 5 · 124110.1021/bm0345256 ↗
6. Klotzbach T. L. · J. Membr. Sci. · 2008 · 311 · 8110.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.043 ↗
7. Cooney M. J. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2008 · 1 · 32010.1039/b809009b ↗
8. Cooney M. J. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2008 · 18 · 66710.1039/b710082e ↗
9. Schuhmann W. · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 1995 · 10 · 18110.1016/0956-5663(95)96805-9 ↗
10. Lau C. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 700410.1021/la8005597 ↗
11. Cooney M. J. · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2008
12. Konash A. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 410710.1039/B611686H ↗
13. Sjoholm K. H. · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2008
14. Liu C. G. · J. Agric. Food Chem. · 2005 · 53 · 43710.1021/jf040188w ↗
15. Martin G. L. · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2008
16. Yuan Z. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 463710.1039/b612091a ↗
17. Yuan Z. · Langmuir · 2007 · 23 · 549810.1021/la062891f ↗
18. Jiang G.-B. · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2006 · 66 · 51410.1016/j.carbpol.2006.04.008 ↗
19. Esquenet C. · Langmuir · 2004 · 20 · 358310.1021/la036395s ↗
20. Martinek K. · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 1989 · 981 · 16110.1016/0005-2736(89)90024-2 ↗
21. Martinek K. · Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR · 1983 · 269 · 491
22. Martinek K. · Biokhimiya · 1988 · 53