Bandgap engineering of PEDOT:PSS/rGO a hole transport layer for SiNWs hybrid solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Silicon nanowire (SiNW) hybrid solar cell has been fabricated using PEDOT:PSS and rGO-PEDOT:PSS as the organic hole transport layer. The electrical characterization of the as-fabricated solar cell was done by both dark and photo J–V characteristic curves. Vertically aligned arrays of SiNWs have been synthesized by following the electroless metal-assisted chemical etching method, as confirmed by both the scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy images. The structural properties of SiNWs, PEDOT:PSS and rGO-PEDOT:PSS were characterized with the help of X-ray diffraction and Raman characterization techniques. The bandgap of PEDOT:PSS comes out to be 1.77 eV as obtained from the UV–visible and photoluminescence spectra. In addition, the bandgap of PEDOT:PSS was 1.76 eV and for reduced graphene oxide (rGO) it was 0.04 eV, as obtained from the cyclic voltammetry curve. rGO-PEDOT:PSS heterojunction showed excellent J–V characteristic property in the dark and under the illumination of 1 sun. Hence the incorporation of rGO in PEDOT:PSS can improve the photovoltaic properties by increasing the conductivity of the hole transport layer, making a good interface between organic–inorganic heterojunction as well as by reducing the recombination of electron–hole pairs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Moiz S A, Alahmadi A N M and Aljohani A J 2020 Energies 13 379710.3390/en13153797 ↗
2. Bhujel R, Rizal U, Agarwal A, Swain B S and Swain B P 2018 J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 27 265510.1007/s11665-018-3179-z ↗
3. Li P, Mohamed M I O, Xu C, Wang X and Tang X 2020 Org. Electron. 78 10558210.1016/j.orgel.2019.105582 ↗
4. Wang J, Wang H, Prakoso A B, Togonal A S, Hong L, Jiang C et al 2015 Nanoscale 7 4559
5. Wang H, Wang J, Hong L, Tan Y H and Tan C S 2016 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11 110.1186/s11671-015-1209-4 ↗
6. Shen R, Liu M, Zhou Y, Li F, Wang H, Yang Y et al 2017 Sol. RRL 1 110.1002/solr.201700133 ↗
7. Singh E and Nalwa H S 2015 RSC Adv. 5 7357510.1039/C5RA11771B ↗
8. Jiang X, Wang Z, Han W, Liu Q, Lu S, Wen Y et al 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 407 39810.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.193 ↗
9. Van Trinh P, Hong P N, Thang B H, Hong N T, Thiet D V, Van Chuc N et al 2017 Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017 Article ID 236205610.1155/2017/2362056 ↗
10. Park Y, Choi K S and Kim S Y 2012 Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 209 136310.1002/pssa.201228040 ↗
11. Wang S, Huang X, Sun H and Wu C 2017 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 61910.1186/s11671-017-2393-1 ↗
12. Park M U, Song M, Lee S M, Ryu S and Chung D-W 2018 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 18 614710.1166/jnn.2018.15622 ↗
13. Lee J and Choi W 2015 J. Electrochem. Soc. 162 A93510.1149/2.0651506jes ↗
14. Mohsennia M, Bidgoli M M and Boroumand F A 2015 J. Nanophoton. 9 09308110.1117/1.JNP.9.093081 ↗
15. Anh N N, Chuc N V, Thang B H, Nhat P V, Hao N, Phuong D D et al 2020 Glob. Chall. 4 200001010.1002/gch2.202000010 ↗
16. Shafiee A, Salleh M M and Yahaya M 2011 Sains. Malays. 40 173
17. Tiwari D C, Dwivedi S K, Dipak P and Chandel T 2018 AIP Conf. Proc. 1953 3
18. Meiss J, Uhrich C L, Fehse K, Pfuetzner S, Riede M K and Leo K 2008 Photonics Sol. Energy Syst. II 7002 70021010.1117/12.781275 ↗
19. Hilal M and Han J I 2018 Sol. Energy 174 74310.1016/j.solener.2018.09.031 ↗
20. Yu X, Shen X, Mu X, Zhang J, Sun B, Zeng L et al 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 1