journal article·2026-06-10

Effect of Continuous-to-Discontinuous Layer Transition on the Interface Evolution and Dielectric Response in Subnanometric Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 Laminates Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition

Partha Sarathi Padhi, Sanjay Kumar Rai, Uttam Kumar Goutam, Rohini Sreedharan Ajimsha, Sunil Verma, Pankaj Misra

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 18· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Recently, Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 nanolaminates (ATA NLs) have emerged as promising materials because of their excellent optical, mechanical, and dielectric properties. However, as individual sublayer thicknesses ( t s ) decrease into the subnanometer range, the impact of interfacial structure evolution on performance degradation remains poorly understood. Here, we have fabricated a series of amorphous subnanometric ATA NLs, with t s values ranging from ∼1 to 0.17 nm, using atomic layer deposition (ALD) and systematically investigated how interfacial evolution affects their structural, electronic, and dielectric properties, particularly their Maxwell–Wagner (M–W) relaxation behavior. The XRR and TEM measurements of NLs confirm the formation of artificial periodic structures with discrete sublayers as thin as ∼0.67 nm. The NL with a t s of 0.67 nm exhibited enhanced M–W interfacial polarization-assisted high k (∼230) and low loss (∼0.07) values, whereas the submonolayer systems suffered from degraded dielectric performance. A comprehensive suite of characterization techniques revealed a critical transition in interface morphology, sublayer density, interface chemistry, and functionality in dielectric behavior near the monolayer thickness regime ( t s ≈ 0.35 nm), marking a transition from continuous-to-discontinuous layer growth with an increased level of intermixing. Electronic structure analyses revealed an associated redistribution of Ti 3+ and oxygen vacancy-induced in-gap states and strong interfacial interdiffusion-driven Al–Ti–O compound formation in the submonolayer regime. These chemical changes from the hybridized electronic environments detrimentally affect dielectric properties due to compromised interfacial confinement. These findings establish a t s of ≈0.35 nm as the practical lower bound for maintaining atomically discrete oxide layers, underscoring the pivotal role of nanoscale interface engineering and defect control in optimizing dielectric behavior in ultrathin oxide heterostructure-based devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nano Electronic Materials and Devices Lab, Photonic Materials Technology Section

Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai 400094, India

Accelerator Physics and Synchrotrons Utilization Division

Technical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, India

Funding

Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India · Homi Bhabha National Institute

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsami.1c2502810.1021/acsami.1c25028 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.sse.2021.10807010.1016/j.sse.2021.108070 ↗
3. 10.1039/D1DT04008A10.1039/D1DT04008A ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.10.02410.1016/j.matlet.2012.10.024 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsaelm.9b0018910.1021/acsaelm.9b00189 ↗
6. 10.1021/am400368x10.1021/am400368x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.sse.2010.05.00710.1016/j.sse.2010.05.007 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20210443010.1002/adfm.202104430 ↗
9. 10.1039/C5CP06713H10.1039/C5CP06713H ↗
10. 10.1002/pssr.20210023610.1002/pssr.202100236 ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-6528/abcbc110.1088/1361-6528/abcbc1 ↗
12. 10.1063/5.001756010.1063/5.0017560 ↗
13. 10.3390/met1103044010.3390/met11030440 ↗
14. 10.1039/D4LF00125G10.1039/D4LF00125G ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.04310.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.043 ↗
16. 10.1039/D3NR00909B10.1039/D3NR00909B ↗
17. 10.1016/j.spmi.2020.10652910.1016/j.spmi.2020.106529 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa4df10.1088/1361-6463/aaa4df ↗
19. Saraf, M.; Kumar, M.; Sunita, P.; Kumar, V. S. P.; Rao, P. K.; Kumari, N.; Karar, V.; Sharma, A. L. Conference Exploring Basic Applied Science Next Generation ; Frontiers (EBAS), 2014; p 289.
20. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/26/26400610.1088/0953-8984/20/26/264006 ↗
21. 10.1149/1.274413610.1149/1.2744136 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.511365610.1063/1.5113656 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0674510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06745 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.479083810.1063/1.4790838 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.5b0648510.1021/acsami.5b06485 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.15544410.1103/PhysRevB.96.155444 ↗
27. 10.1116/6.000284910.1116/6.0002849 ↗
28. 10.1063/5.020277610.1063/5.0202776 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00339-018-2112-510.1007/s00339-018-2112-5 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.14710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.147 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.08810.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.088 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10961010.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109610 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mne.2022.10010710.1016/j.mne.2022.100107 ↗
34. 10.1039/D1RA04412E10.1039/D1RA04412E ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.07310.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.073 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.11640210.1103/PhysRevLett.117.116402 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10854-023-10615-310.1007/s10854-023-10615-3 ↗