journal article·2026-05-06

Tetra-Polyethylene Glycol Hydrogel Coating Enhances the Performance and Stability of Electrochemical Sensors in Complex Biological Matrices

Thien Tien Nguyen, Alexandre X. Mendes, Vatsala Pithaih, Henry F. F. Bellette, Thiago Coimbra Pimenta, Simon E. Moulton, Ronil J. Rath, George Wren Greene, Kevin W. Plaxco, Saimon M. Silva

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 18· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Electrochemical aptamer-based (EAB) sensors promise real-time, reagent-free drug and biomarker monitoring, but protein adsorption and enzymatic degradation of their target-recognizing aptamers rapidly depress their signal and induce drift in complex matrices, such as saliva or undiluted whole blood. Size-excluding hydrogels offer an approach to reducing these effects, but the problem remains of achieving long-duration operation without significantly throttling the analyte transport or electron transfer to the electrode. In response, here we show that a tetra-poly(ethylene glycol) (tetra-PEG) hydrogel coating forms a soft, highly hydrated, ∼31 nm mesh network that excludes large glycoproteins and cellular components, reduces drift while preserving electron transfer, and enables acceptably rapid small-molecule access. Specifically, in undiluted saliva and bovine blood, this coating reduces electrode fouling and helps sustain EAB performance. For example, in undiluted whole blood at 37 °C, hydrogel-protected sensors exhibit lower drift over 8 h (∼5.7 vs ∼25.1% for unprotected controls) while maintaining a comparable signal gain across the tested vancomycin concentrations. It thus appears that the tetra-PEG hydrogel network can balance antifouling efficacy and nuclease resistance with electron transfer compatibility, suggesting that it may prove to be a practical route to long-duration, in-matrix, and, ultimately, in vivo monitoring using EAB sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Biomedical and Environmental Sensor Technology (BEST) Research Centre, Biosensors Program, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science (LIMS)

La Trobe University

Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment

School of Engineering

Swinburne University of Technology

Aikenhead Centre for Medical Discovery

St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne

Center for Bioengineering

University of California Santa Barbara

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Funding

Australian Research Council (ARC)

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20231667810.1002/anie.202316678 ↗
2. 10.1021/acssensors.1c0039010.1021/acssensors.1c00390 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0075910.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00759 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0038210.1021/acs.accounts.1c00382 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c0515810.1021/acs.analchem.2c05158 ↗
6. 10.1021/acssensors.4c0346510.1021/acssensors.4c03465 ↗
7. 10.1039/D3AN00341H10.1039/D3AN00341H ↗
8. 10.1021/acssensors.2c0142810.1021/acssensors.2c01428 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20180059610.1002/adfm.201800596 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20200093610.1002/adfm.202000936 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0485910.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04859 ↗
12. Singh M. K. · 2020 · 1510.1007/978-3-030-47451-5_2 ↗
13. 10.1002/admi.20170129610.1002/admi.201701296 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.11.00710.1016/j.elecom.2012.11.007 ↗
15. 10.1039/D1TB02751D10.1039/D1TB02751D ↗
16. Lin-Gibson S. · Polym. Prepr. · 2009 · 50 · 108
17. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5c0069510.1021/acs.macromol.5c00695 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.macromol.4c0244610.1021/acs.macromol.4c02446 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00396-018-4423-710.1007/s00396-018-4423-7 ↗
20. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0078710.1021/acssensors.7b00787 ↗
21. 10.1021/acssensors.9b0161610.1021/acssensors.9b01616 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c0082910.1021/acs.analchem.2c00829 ↗
23. 10.1111/jpc.1468310.1111/jpc.14683 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-017-12312-810.1038/s41598-017-12312-8 ↗
25. 10.1038/s44222-024-00175-410.1038/s44222-024-00175-4 ↗
26. 10.1038/s43246-024-00541-010.1038/s43246-024-00541-0 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c0480610.1021/acs.analchem.2c04806 ↗
28. 10.1021/bm100137q10.1021/bm100137q ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cis.2025.10369110.1016/j.cis.2025.103691 ↗
30. 10.1039/D5BM01187F10.1039/D5BM01187F ↗
31. 10.1038/s41598-020-72978-510.1038/s41598-020-72978-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.10110.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.101 ↗
33. 10.1002/jbm.82023100710.1002/jbm.820231007 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c0044910.1021/acs.biomac.3c00449 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.snr.2025.10033010.1016/j.snr.2025.100330 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bios.2025.11832810.1016/j.bios.2025.118328 ↗
37. 10.1002/celc.20200039310.1002/celc.202000393 ↗
38. 10.1039/D4SD00066H10.1039/D4SD00066H ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0652010.1021/acsnano.3c06520 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.12728910.1016/j.talanta.2024.127289 ↗
41. 10.1021/acssensors.2c0240310.1021/acssensors.2c02403 ↗
42. 10.1021/acssensors.5c0060310.1021/acssensors.5c00603 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41551-025-01389-610.1038/s41551-025-01389-6 ↗
44. 10.1002/pi.133410.1002/pi.1334 ↗
45. 10.1039/b603438a10.1039/b603438a ↗
46. Alger M. S. M. · 1989
47. 10.1098/rsif.2005.006510.1098/rsif.2005.0065 ↗
48. 10.1002/app.1977.07021070410.1002/app.1977.070210704 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.08.03810.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.08.038 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00025-810.1016/S0142-9612(98)00025-8 ↗