journal article·2025-12-03Open access

Fine-Tuned Functionalizable Terpolymer Brush Nanocoating Resists Protein Adsorption and Bacterial Adhesion while Promoting Macrophage Activity and Osteoblast Proliferation

Alina Pilipenco, Guruprakash Subbiahdoss, Michala Forinová, Oleksandr Romanyuk, Milan Houska, Monika Spasovová, Carmelo Covato, Andrea Scheberl, Erik Reimhult, Hana Vaisocherová-Lísalová

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 17· Issue 48

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Developing multifunctional biomaterial surfaces that resist biofouling while supporting cellular activity remains a significant challenge in biomedical engineering. We present a finely tuned functionalizable terpolymer brush nanocoating composed of zwitterionic carboxybetaine methacrylamide (CBMAA), sulfobetaine methacrylamide (SBMAA) and nonionic N -(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMAA) with balanced antifouling cytocompatible characteristics through optimized surface hydration and charge. We analyzed chemical composition, thickness, ζ -potential, and wettability using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, spectroscopic ellipsometry, electrokinetic analysis, and water contact angle measurements. Systematic monomer ratio tuning identified poly(CBMAA 20 mol %- co -HPMAA 77 mol %- co -SBMAA 3 mol %) as the optimal composition, reducing protein adsorption by 98% in serum-rich media and suppressing Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion by 99%, effectively preventing biofilm formation under both static and flow conditions. Furthermore, macrophages exhibit enhanced mobility on terpolymer coatings due to their high hydration and low protein adsorption, underpinning reduced adverse immune response. Postfunctionalization with Gly-Arg-Asp (RGD) peptides enabled the adhesion of osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells while maintaining antifouling efficacy. The tunable multifunctionality of terpolymer brushes in resisting fouling, promoting macrophage phagocytic activity, and supporting SaOS-2 cell adhesion makes them suitable for both antifouling applications and medical implants requiring host tissue integration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Antimicrobial agents and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

FZU-Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2, Prague 182 00, Czech Republic

Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 3, Prague 121 16, Czech Republic

Institute of Colloid and Biointerface Science, BOKU University, Muthgasse 11, Vienna A-1190, Austria

Funding

Universit?t f?r Bodenkultur Wien · Hochschuljubil?umsstiftung der Stadt Wien · European Commission · Bundesministerium f?r Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie · Ministerstvo ?kolstv?, Ml?de?e a Telov?chovy · Grantov? Agentura Cesk? Republiky · Univerzita Karlova v Praze

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0073910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00739 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.05.02810.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.05.028 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.11075610.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110756 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.9b0990010.1021/acsami.9b09900 ↗
5. 10.1002/mabi.20180011210.1002/mabi.201800112 ↗
6. 10.1182/blood.V98.4.123110.1182/blood.V98.4.1231 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.04810.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.048 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0928-8244(96)00073-910.1016/S0928-8244(96)00073-9 ↗
9. 10.1177/095441191455613710.1177/0954411914556137 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.01610.1016/j.ijmm.2017.09.016 ↗
11. 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.00828010.1161/CIRCEP.119.008280 ↗
12. 10.1002/jbm.a.3408710.1002/jbm.a.34087 ↗
13. 10.22203/eCM.v021a0610.22203/eCM.v021a06 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.03810.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.038 ↗
15. 10.1177/153537021665029310.1177/1535370216650293 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.01510.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015 ↗
17. 10.1371/journal.pone.002482710.1371/journal.pone.0024827 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y ↗
19. 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.00410.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-210.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.04410.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.044 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0055410.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00554 ↗
23. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69777610.1080/01694243.2012.697776 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp502711410.1021/jp5027114 ↗
25. 10.1039/C4PY01356E10.1039/C4PY01356E ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.03810.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.038 ↗
27. 10.1039/C9SC06155J10.1039/C9SC06155J ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0076810.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00768 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0119310.1021/acs.biomac.0c01193 ↗
30. 10.1002/mabi.20140047010.1002/mabi.201400470 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20231620110.1002/adfm.202316201 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0051610.1021/acs.biomac.7b00516 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.03.02410.1016/j.mattod.2020.03.024 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.7b0689910.1021/acsami.7b06899 ↗
35. 10.1116/1.491337610.1116/1.4913376 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0035910.1021/acs.biomac.5b00359 ↗
37. 10.3390/ma1416459610.3390/ma14164596 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.0c0214310.1021/acsami.0c02143 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.06110.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.061 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.02210.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.022 ↗
41. 10.1002/adfm.20190901110.1002/adfm.201909011 ↗
42. 10.1002/mabi.20190035410.1002/mabi.201900354 ↗
43. 10.1002/polb.2490710.1002/polb.24907 ↗
44. 10.1021/bm500168s10.1021/bm500168s ↗
45. 10.1117/12.301761310.1117/12.3017613 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.1c1693010.1021/acsami.1c16930 ↗
47. 10.1093/jtm/taad06510.1093/jtm/taad065 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.11069510.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110695 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.crbiot.2023.10016610.1016/j.crbiot.2023.100166 ↗
50. 10.1002/mabi.20190035110.1002/mabi.201900351 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0221910.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02219 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.10124810.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101248 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0353610.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03536 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.polymer.2025.12815510.1016/j.polymer.2025.128155 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0261710.1021/acs.analchem.6b02617 ↗
56. 10.1039/D2PY00478J10.1039/D2PY00478J ↗
57. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16091410.1016/j.cej.2025.160914 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.11433610.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.114336 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c0075910.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00759 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.02210.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.022 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.03010.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.030 ↗
62. 10.1021/ac049297010.1021/ac0492970 ↗
63. 10.1002/mabi.20220024710.1002/mabi.202200247 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.041 ↗
65. 10.1039/C4RA09171J.10.1039/C4RA09171J. ↗
66. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0132910.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01329 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11120510.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111205 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.02810.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.028 ↗
69. 10.1371/journal.pone.007004610.1371/journal.pone.0070046 ↗
70. 10.3390/biom1008114610.3390/biom10081146 ↗