journal article·2025-11-19

Direct Observation of Rh and La Dopant Positions in SrTiO 3 Nanoparticles with Atomic-Scale Electron Microscopy

Justin T. Mulvey, Pushp Raj Prasad, Zejie Chen, Levi D. Palmer, Bradley W. Layne, Ezra Korican-Barlay, Kenta Watanabe, Mingjie Xu, A. Alec Talin, Xiaoqing Pan, Akihiko Kudo, Scott K. Cushing, Shane Ardo, Joseph P. Patterson

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 17· Issue 46
Publisher page

Abstract

Doped SrTiO 3 nanoparticles constitute a leading materials platform for solar hydrogen production. One of the most ubiquitous and efficient SrTiO 3 materials utilizes Rh and La as dopants, designed to improve both visible-light absorption and charge separation ability. Typically, dopant positions in the SrTiO 3 lattice are assigned using ionic size and charge or ensemble-averaged techniques such as power X-ray diffraction or Raman spectroscopy. Direct observations of dopant locations in the SrTiO 3 lattice have not been previously reported. Here, we apply atomic-scale scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) coupled with image processing to directly elucidate dopant locations in 2% Rh-doped SrTiO 3 (Rh:SrTiO 3 ) and 2% La, 2% Rh codoped SrTiO 3 (La,Rh:SrTiO 3 ). Ensemble measurements were first performed to quantify aggregate properties across many particles of each type. Measurements of H 2 using in-line mass spectrometry suggest that the materials have different quantum yields for photocatalytic H 2 evolution, and Raman spectroscopy suggest that the concentration of dopants in the B-site (Ti site) differs. Simultaneous atomic-scale STEM, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) were performed on individual nanoparticles to directly determine dopant locations. Results indicate that in Rh:SrTiO 3, Rh occupies both the A-site and the B-site, which is unexpected because ionic radii argument suggests Rh will occupy only the B-site. In La,Rh:SrTiO 3, La primarily occupies the A-site and Rh primarily occupies the B-site. Precise knowledge of dopant positions is used to inform density functional theory (DFT) simulations for each doped lattice’s electronic structure. These combined results suggest that La codoping can hinder photocatalytic H 2 evolution activity when Rh dopants exist in B-site recombination centers. The methods presented here demonstrate the effectiveness of correlating ensemble measurements, atomic-scale STEM imaging, and DFT simulations to establish structure–performance relationships for doped SrTiO 3 nanoparticles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Material Science and Engineering

University of California Irvine

Department of Chemistry

Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

California Institute of Technology

University of California

Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science, Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan

Chemistry, Combustion and Materials Science Center

Sandia National Laboratories

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Irvine Materials Research Institute (IMRI)

Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering

Funding

Energy Frontier Research Centers · National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program · Office of Science

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c0001110.1021/acs.accounts.3c00011 ↗
2. 10.1039/B800489G10.1039/B800489G ↗
3. 10.1021/jp407040p10.1021/jp407040p ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0314310.1021/acs.jpcc.4c03143 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0287410.1021/acscatal.1c02874 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.elecom.2008.08.01710.1016/j.elecom.2008.08.017 ↗
7. 10.1021/jp512948s10.1021/jp512948s ↗
8. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10980310.1016/j.optmat.2020.109803 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20241462810.1002/anie.202414628 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00442-810.1016/S1010-6030(03)00442-8 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat458910.1038/nmat4589 ↗
12. 10.1039/D4SC03978E10.1039/D4SC03978E ↗
13. 10.1039/C3CC49279F10.1039/C3CC49279F ↗
14. 10.1021/cm501198310.1021/cm5011983 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.21310.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.213 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.04710.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.047 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.13110.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.131 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.physb.2021.41326510.1016/j.physb.2021.413265 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7RA03598E10.1039/C7RA03598E ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0512810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05128 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.06580110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.065801 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0666710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06667 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41563-020-00868-210.1038/s41563-020-00868-2 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0290610.1021/acs.jpcb.5b02906 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.215310.1103/PhysRevB.57.2153 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-0-387-76501-3_110.1007/978-0-387-76501-3_1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.02910.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.029 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.06.00510.1016/j.mssp.2016.06.005 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp049556p10.1021/jp049556p ↗
30. 10.1039/D4EE02005G10.1039/D4EE02005G ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0144810.1021/acsnano.3c01448 ↗
32. 10.1039/C8SE00487K10.1039/C8SE00487K ↗
33. 10.3390/app901005510.3390/app9010055 ↗
34. 10.1021/jp308252910.1021/jp3082529 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10417.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10417.x ↗
36. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.48810.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.488 ↗
37. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0043010.1021/acscentsci.0c00430 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0355610.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03556 ↗
39. 10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0555810.1021/acsanm.4c05558 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41598-021-02751-910.1038/s41598-021-02751-9 ↗
42. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/48/48500210.1088/0953-8984/24/48/485002 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.486173010.1063/1.4861730 ↗
44. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.08511710.1103/PhysRevB.88.085117 ↗