journal article·2025-10-09Open access

Improving Adhesion of UHMWPE with Epoxy Matrix by Reactive Ion Etching of UHMWPE Using Ar–O 2 Plasma and the Effects of Plasma on Adhesion at the Micro- and Macroscale

Usman Sikander, Mark K. Hazzard, Ian Hamerton, Michael R. Wisnom

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers offer an excellent range of mechanical properties, but their applications in composites are limited due to their inert surface, which limits matrix wetting. This study employs reactive ion etching (RIE), using Ar–O 2 gases to significantly improve the adhesion of UHMWPE fibers (with no surface finish) and tapes with epoxy at the micro- and macrolevels. Various oxygen-bearing functionalities are observed on the surface of the fiber after plasma treatment, confirmed by FTIR. These functional groups improve links between the unsized fiber and Prime20 LV epoxy resin. Consequently, the apparent interfacial shear strength (τ IFSS ), measured by microbond testing, increases by 143%, 171%, and 181% as a result of plasma exposure for 10, 60, and 300 s, respectively, compared to untreated fibers. However, the frictional stress (τ f ) in the postdebonded region of the microbond curve remains constant and independent of plasma exposure. Short-beam shear testing of interleaved composite laminates shows a 63% increase in the ILSS, along with a change of failure mode from interfacial failure to defibrillation of the tape itself after plasma treatment, mitigating a key limitation of using this material in structural applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bristol Composites Institute, School of Civil, Aerospace and Design Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queen’s Building

University Walk

DSM Materials Science Centre, Urmonderbaan 22, 6167 RD Geleen, The Netherlands

Funding

UK Research and Innovation · DSM

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-461-1.00003-010.1016/B978-1-78242-461-1.00003-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10745010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107450 ↗
3. Hazzard M. K. · 2015
4. 10.1007/s12046-021-01730-010.1007/s12046-021-01730-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/0032-3861(92)91142-O10.1016/0032-3861(92)91142-O ↗
6. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00429-210.1016/S0032-3861(99)00429-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0261-3069(89)80021-410.1016/S0261-3069(89)80021-4 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.9b2345910.1021/acsami.9b23459 ↗
9. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101272-7.00018-310.1016/B978-0-08-101272-7.00018-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/0010-4361(90)90424-U10.1016/0010-4361(90)90424-U ↗
11. 10.1007/s10443-022-10077-610.1007/s10443-022-10077-6 ↗
12. Stolk, J.; Kanters, M. J. W.; Hoksbergen, N.; Corakci, B.; Hazzard, M. K.; Plug, H.; Kidd, T. J. New High Performance Hybrid Composites with Dyneema Fiber. Presented at the 5th Annual Composites and Advanced Materials Expo, CAMX; 2018.
13. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.05.06210.1016/j.polymer.2017.05.062 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00289-016-1742-z10.1007/s00289-016-1742-z ↗
15. 10.1002/app.1994.07052121310.1002/app.1994.070521213 ↗
16. 10.1002/polb.2455210.1002/polb.24552 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.00410.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.21510.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.215 ↗
19. 10.1088/0022-3727/34/18/30710.1088/0022-3727/34/18/307 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.027 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2013.04.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2013.04.002 ↗
22. 10.1002/pat.424010.1002/pat.4240 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10614610.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106146 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.1993.07047120210.1002/app.1993.070471202 ↗
25. Kim J. K. · 1998
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.026 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.017 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.08.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.08.006 ↗
29. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90131-Y10.1016/0266-3538(93)90131-Y ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.75013030910.1002/pc.750130309 ↗
31. 10.1002/app.2865210.1002/app.28652 ↗
32. 10.1002/app.1993.07047111610.1002/app.1993.070471116 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0057603610.1007/BF00576036 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.12499010.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.124990 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.3254910.1002/app.32549 ↗
36. 10.3390/mi1208099110.3390/mi12080991 ↗
37. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-461-1.00013-310.1016/B978-1-78242-461-1.00013-3 ↗
38. 10.1098/rspa.2019.031010.1098/rspa.2019.0310 ↗
39. Azamtu, S. A. Assessing the Interfacial Shear Strength of Anhydride-Cured Epoxy Resins on Glass Fibre, by Means of Single-Fibre Microbond Testing. MEng Dissertation, University of Bristol, 2019.
40. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.006 ↗
41. 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-210.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗
42. ASTM · 2000
43. 10.1007/s00170-007-1357-510.1007/s00170-007-1357-5 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.07310.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.073 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10107710.1016/j.surfin.2021.101077 ↗
46. 10.1002/ppap.20093090610.1002/ppap.200930906 ↗
47. 10.1002/9780470027318.a560610.1002/9780470027318.a5606 ↗
48. 10.1002/sia.261110.1002/sia.2611 ↗
49. 10.1002/sia.633610.1002/sia.6336 ↗
50. Socrates G. · 2001
51. Pârvulescu V. I. · 201210.1002/9783527649525 ↗
52. 10.1163/15685610677789062610.1163/156856106777890626 ↗
53. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-510.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-5 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.09.01710.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.09.017 ↗
55. Chauvenet W. · 1863
56. 10.1080/0021846910802650610.1080/00218469108026506 ↗
57. 10.1007/BF0035124610.1007/BF00351246 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.02710.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.027 ↗
59. 10.1016/0961-9526(94)90080-910.1016/0961-9526(94)90080-9 ↗
60. 10.1002/admi.20180029510.1002/admi.201800295 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.03.01510.1016/j.jmps.2018.03.015 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10803510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108035 ↗