journal article·2025-08-27Open access

Multifunctional 3D-Printed Wound Dressings Containing a Combination of Synergistic Antimicrobials in the Management of MRSA Infected Topical Wounds

Iman Mattar, Guillermo Landa, Marina Frutos-Lizano, Natalia Izquierdo, Elena Tapia, Marta Perez, Lluis Lujan, Silvia Irusta, Gracia Mendoza, Manuel Arruebo

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 17· Issue 34

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Despite increased pre- and postoperative care and aseptic practices in surgical rooms, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to colonize acute surgical wounds. MRSA is also present in chronic nonhealing wounds, such as diabetic foot and pressure ulcers. In this work, advanced antimicrobial-loaded wound dressings are 3D printed using fused deposition modeling. To achieve a high antimicrobial effect, the topical antiseptic octenidine (OCT) was incorporated into the pellets used in the feeder of the extruder prior to fused modeling. Lysostaphin (LYS), a lytic enzyme that cleaves MRSA peptidoglycan, was incorporated by supramolecular interactions on the surface of the OCT-loaded dressings to exploit the anti-MRSA synergy identified here between OCT and LYS showing a fractional inhibition concentration index (FICI) of 0.156. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and bactericidal concentration (MBC) values for the OCT were 1 and 25 μg/mL, respectively, whereas the MIC and MBC values for the LYS were 0.1 and 0.2 μg/mL, respectively. The resulting dressings completely eradicate MRSA USA 300 inocula (10 5 CFU/mL) in 96 h. The bactericidal mechanisms exerted by these dressings were identified through molecular techniques, showing lytic effects on the cell wall peptidoglycans of treated bacteria. Additionally, OCT at 1 μg/mL was able to reduce lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/mL)-induced NO production on murine J774A.1 macrophages by more than 90% demonstrating its simultaneous anti-inflammatory action. This effect was also corroborated by the qRT-PCR analysis of several pro-inflammatory genes including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and Nos2. The combination of OCT and LYS within the dressings reveals higher in vivo therapeutic effects compared to free compounds or individual antimicrobial-loaded dressings. In vitro and in preclinical models, the use of OCT-LYS dressings effectively reduces MRSA bioburden and inflammation, promoting fast wound healing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Antimicrobial agents and applications · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Instituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón (INMA), CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Zaragoza, Campus Río Ebro-Edificio I+D, C/Poeta Mariano Esquillor S/N, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain

Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragon)

Animal Unit

University of Zaragoza

Department of Anatomy, Embryology and Animal Genetics, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain

Instituto Universitario de Investigación Mixto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2)

Department of Animal Pathology, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain

Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Forensic and Legal Medicine, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci?n y Universidades · Instituto de Salud Carlos III

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-010.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 ↗
2. 10.1128/aac.02374-2110.1128/aac.02374-21 ↗
3. 10.2900/7346010.2900/73460 ↗
4. 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00040-510.1016/S2666-5247(24)00040-5 ↗
5. 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21664.858710.7860/JCDR/2016/21664.8587 ↗
6. 10.1093/jacamr/dlae04610.1093/jacamr/dlae046 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-020-74070-410.1038/s41598-020-74070-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.04110.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.041 ↗
9. 10.1186/s12879-021-06516-710.1186/s12879-021-06516-7 ↗
10. 10.1111/wrr.1237010.1111/wrr.12370 ↗
11. 10.2147/DMSO.S44691110.2147/DMSO.S446911 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.01.00110.1016/j.ijheh.2010.01.001 ↗
13. 10.1186/s12879-018-3253-z10.1186/s12879-018-3253-z ↗
14. 10.1002/dmrr.328410.1002/dmrr.3284 ↗
15. 10.1089/wound.2020.119310.1089/wound.2020.1193 ↗
16. 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup3a.S110.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup3a.S1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.05.01010.1016/j.jgar.2021.05.010 ↗
18. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.111957410.3389/fimmu.2023.1119574 ↗
19. 10.1093/nar/gkv127810.1093/nar/gkv1278 ↗
20. 10.3390/ph903005910.3390/ph9030059 ↗
21. 10.1128/AAC.02199-2010.1128/AAC.02199-20 ↗
22. 10.1126/sciadv.abb901110.1126/sciadv.abb9011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.01.01610.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.01.016 ↗
24. 10.2147/DDDT.S7212910.2147/DDDT.S72129 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.04510.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.045 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13256310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132563 ↗
27. 10.1186/s11658-024-00542-410.1186/s11658-024-00542-4 ↗
28. 10.1093/jac/dkn12510.1093/jac/dkn125 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.02210.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.022 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.01010.1016/j.joen.2022.09.010 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.02710.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027 ↗
32. 10.1128/aem.00180-2210.1128/aem.00180-22 ↗
33. 10.1093/jac/dkm09210.1093/jac/dkm092 ↗
34. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00648.x10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00648.x ↗
35. 10.1038/s41598-020-79378-910.1038/s41598-020-79378-9 ↗
36. 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.2.10610.12968/jowc.2021.30.2.106 ↗
37. 10.1111/iwj.1225010.1111/iwj.12250 ↗
38. 10.1128/AAC.00786-0610.1128/AAC.00786-06 ↗
39. 10.3390/molecules2501009510.3390/molecules25010095 ↗
40. 10.1128/mBio.00894-1810.1128/mBio.00894-18 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.10236110.1016/j.jddst.2021.102361 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.146510.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1465 ↗
43. Royal Society of Chemistry. Chemspider.com. Octenidine dihydrochloride, CSID 46370. https://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.46370.Html (accessed Mar 10, 2025).
44. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.00910.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.009 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.04.01610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.04.016 ↗
46. 10.3390/polym1608106210.3390/polym16081062 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.tca.2009.10.00510.1016/j.tca.2009.10.005 ↗
48. 10.1080/10601325.2012.72285810.1080/10601325.2012.722858 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00223-X10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00223-X ↗
50. 10.3390/polym1419397610.3390/polym14193976 ↗
51. 10.1039/D0NR03134H10.1039/D0NR03134H ↗
52. 10.1128/AAC.01707-2010.1128/AAC.01707-20 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10096-011-1188-z10.1007/s10096-011-1188-z ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.02.03010.1016/j.jhin.2024.02.030 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.04.03310.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.04.033 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.11510.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.115 ↗
57. 10.3109/01480545.2015.112127410.3109/01480545.2015.1121274 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41598-019-51614-x10.1038/s41598-019-51614-x ↗
59. 10.1113/EP09078010.1113/EP090780 ↗
60. 10.1155/2012/89294310.1155/2012/892943 ↗
61. 10.1073/pnas.180101311510.1073/pnas.1801013115 ↗
62. 10.1039/C9MD00044E10.1039/C9MD00044E ↗
63. 10.1073/pnas.172007111510.1073/pnas.1720071115 ↗
64. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00149.x10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00149.x ↗
65. 10.1093/jac/dkg30110.1093/jac/dkg301 ↗
66. 10.1093/nar/29.9.e4510.1093/nar/29.9.e45 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.12350210.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123502 ↗