Transforming Catalysis with Machine Learning: Emerging Tools and Next-Gen Strategies
Source abstract
Abstract
Catalysis plays a central role in the modern chemical industry, yet the discovery of high-performance catalysts remains constrained by traditional experimental and ab initio calculation approaches. Recently, the rapid development of machine learning methods has caused a major revolution in the field of catalytic chemistry, which promises to accelerate the catalyst development with unprecedented efficiency. This review systematically introduces the fundamental concepts and workflows of ML in catalysis, followed by a comprehensive overview of both traditional machine learning─typically based on small data sets and shallow models─and deep learning (DL), which leverages large-scale data and complex architectures. We highlight key modeling strategies, algorithmic frameworks, and representative applications in catalyst design, reaction prediction, and surface adsorption systems. Finally, we discuss current challenges, including fragmented and inconsistent data, limited physical interpretability, and difficulties in integrating ML with experimental workflows, and propose future directions to address these issues and further advance the field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Topic Modeling · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering
Beijing University of Chemical Technology
AI for Science Institute
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Hagen J. · 2015 · 45910.1002/9783527684625.ch17 ↗
2. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
4. 10.1038/sdata.2014.2210.1038/sdata.2014.22 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0542610.1021/acscatal.2c05426 ↗
6. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0452510.1021/acscatal.0c04525 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
8. 10.1038/s43588-022-00265-610.1038/s43588-022-00265-6 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b0057710.1021/acs.jctc.7b00577 ↗
10. CAS SciFinder. https://scifinder-n.cas.org/ (accessed 2025-07-3).
11. 10.1021/acsami.0c0353610.1021/acsami.0c03536 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41524-023-01121-510.1038/s41524-023-01121-5 ↗
13. 10.1039/D2TA04556G10.1039/D2TA04556G ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.9b1453010.1021/acsami.9b14530 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41524-022-00704-y10.1038/s41524-022-00704-y ↗
16. 10.1038/s41929-022-00744-z10.1038/s41929-022-00744-z ↗
17. Buber, E.; Diri, B. Performance Analysis and CPU vs GPU Comparison for Deep Learning. 2018 6th International Conference on Control Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT); IEEE: Istanbul, Turkey, 2018; pp 1–6.10.1109/CEIT.2018.8751930 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.501977910.1063/1.5019779 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
21. 10.1038/s43588-022-00349-310.1038/s43588-022-00349-3 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.aat266310.1126/science.aat2663 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.1c0104410.1021/acsami.1c01044 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41586-023-06735-910.1038/s41586-023-06735-9 ↗
25. 10.1039/D3SC07012C10.1039/D3SC07012C ↗
26. 10.1145/338625210.1145/3386252 ↗
27. Yin, H.; Aryani, A.; Petrie, S.; Nambissan, A.; Astudillo, A.; Cao, S. A Rapid Review of Clustering Algorithms. arXiv January 14, 2024. http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07389 (accessed 2025-04-11).
28. 10.1613/jair.30110.1613/jair.301 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41929-023-00920-910.1038/s41929-023-00920-9 ↗
30. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0495610.1021/acscatal.3c04956 ↗
31. Settles, B. From Theories to Queries: Active Learning in Practice. In Active Learning and Experimental Design Workshop in Conjunction with AISTATS 2010; Guyon, I., Cawley, G., Dror, G., Lemaire, V., Statnikov, A., Eds. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research; PMLR: Sardinia, Italy, 2011; Vol. 16, pp 1–18.
32. 10.1021/acsami.3c1510810.1021/acsami.3c15108 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41929-018-0142-110.1038/s41929-018-0142-1 ↗
34. 10.1039/D3TA05939A10.1039/D3TA05939A ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20240015210.1002/aenm.202400152 ↗
36. 10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z ↗
37. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11837-013-0755-410.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
39. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
40. 10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc110.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 ↗
41. 10.1088/2053-1583/ac105910.1088/2053-1583/ac1059 ↗
42. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0452510.1021/acscatal.0c04525 ↗
43. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0542610.1021/acscatal.2c05426 ↗
44. 10.1021/acscentsci.3c0162910.1021/acscentsci.3c01629 ↗
45. 10.1038/nature2326810.1038/nature23268 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41586-019-0954-410.1038/s41586-019-0954-4 ↗
47. 10.1126/science.abg909410.1126/science.abg9094 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41524-020-00440-110.1038/s41524-020-00440-1 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11180810.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111808 ↗
50. 10.1007/s40843-022-2134-310.1007/s40843-022-2134-3 ↗
51. 10.1021/ja902302h10.1021/ja902302h ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.05830110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301 ↗
53. 10.1021/ci300415d10.1021/ci300415d ↗
54. 10.1039/C6SC05720A10.1039/C6SC05720A ↗
55. 10.1038/sdata.2017.19310.1038/sdata.2017.193 ↗
56. 10.1126/sciadv.160301510.1126/sciadv.1603015 ↗
57. Liu, W.; Ai, X.; Zhou, Z.; Qu, C.; An, J.; Zhou, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, Y.; Cao, F.; Qi, A. An Open Quantum Chemistry Property Database of 120 Kilo Molecules with 20 Million Conformers. arXiv 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19316 (accessed 2025-04-24).
58. 10.1021/ci00038a00310.1021/ci00038a003 ↗
59. Stalick, J. K. Crystal Data: Version 1.0 Database Specifications, 1986. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/TN/nbstechnicalnote1229.pdf (accessed 2025-04-23).
60. 10.1107/S010876810200694810.1107/S0108768102006948 ↗
61. 10.1186/s13321-023-00780-210.1186/s13321-023-00780-2 ↗
62. 10.1093/nar/gkae105910.1093/nar/gkae1059 ↗
63. Heaton, J. An Empirical Analysis of Feature Engineering for Predictive Modeling. SoutheastCon 2016; 2016; pp 1–6.10.1109/SECON.2016.7506650 ↗
64. 10.1038/s41467-024-50417-710.1038/s41467-024-50417-7 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.apcata.2023.11948710.1016/j.apcata.2023.119487 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41586-020-2242-810.1038/s41586-020-2242-8 ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0010710.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 ↗
68. Montanari, A.; Saeed, B. N. Universality of Empirical Risk Minimization. Proceedings of Thirty Fifth Conference on Learning Theory; Loh, P.L., Raginsky, M., Eds. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research; PMLR, 2022; Vol. 178, pp 4310–4312.
69. Vapnik V. · 1991 · 4
70. Gokcesu, K.; Gokcesu, H. Generalized Huber Loss for Robust Learning and Its Efficient Minimization for a Robust Statistics. arXiv August 28, 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12627 (accessed 2025-04-15).
71. Lin, T.Y.; Goyal, P.; Girshick, R.; He, K.; Dollar, P. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 2017.10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
72. Boser, B. E.; Guyon, I. M.; Vapnik, V. N. A Training Algorithm for Optimal Margin Classifiers. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory; COLT ’92; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, 1992; pp 144–152.10.1145/130385.130401 ↗
73. 10.1039/C7TA01812F10.1039/C7TA01812F ↗
74. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1267010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12670 ↗
75. 10.1007/s00214-024-03124-x10.1007/s00214-024-03124-x ↗
76. 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13152910.1016/j.fuel.2024.131529 ↗
77. Frazier P. I. · 2018 · 25510.1287/educ.2018.0188 ↗
78. Bergstra, J.; Yamins, D.; Cox, D. Making a Science of Model Search: Hyperparameter Optimization in Hundreds of Dimensions for Vision Architectures. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning; Dasgupta, S., McAllester, D., Eds. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research; PMLR: Atlanta, 2013; Vol. 28, pp 115–123.
79. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0076510.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00765 ↗
80. 10.1021/acsami.4c1169510.1021/acsami.4c11695 ↗
81. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq13410.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 ↗
82. Lundberg, S. M.; Lee, S.I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; NIPS’17; Curran Associates Inc.: Red Hook, NY, 2017; pp 4768–4777.
83. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
84. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0279910.1021/acscatal.4c02799 ↗
85. 10.1038/s42004-023-01086-y10.1038/s42004-023-01086-y ↗
86. 10.1002/anie.20240076510.1002/anie.202400765 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.12639210.1016/j.seppur.2024.126392 ↗
88. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0122510.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01225 ↗
89. 10.1021/jacsau.4c0090110.1021/jacsau.4c00901 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12946910.1016/j.fuel.2023.129469 ↗
91. 10.1002/eem2.1288810.1002/eem2.12888 ↗
92. 10.1021/acsami.3c1738910.1021/acsami.3c17389 ↗
93. 10.1021/jacs.4c0587910.1021/jacs.4c05879 ↗
94. 10.1007/s10858-024-00435-w10.1007/s10858-024-00435-w ↗
95. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c0600710.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06007 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.20010.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.200 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.22910.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.229 ↗
98. 10.1021/acscentsci.3c0161510.1021/acscentsci.3c01615 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.02.03410.1016/j.jcat.2004.02.034 ↗
100. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗