Optimizing Catalyst Location within Nanostructured Photoelectrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of catalyst location within nanostructured photocathodes on conversion efficiency is reported. Highly uniform vertically aligned silicon nanowire (VA-SiNW) arrays prepared via colloidal lithography and metal-assisted chemical etching were used as a model-system photoelectrode for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Using three-dimensional electrochemical axial lithography (3DEAL), the Pt catalyst was located either at the top, center, or bottom of the SiNWs, or uniformly throughout the array. The SiNWs were spatioselectively passivated with an insulating coating to limit charge recombination at the silicon-electrolyte interface. Our results show that the most efficient catalyst position is the center of the SiNW, with an enhanced short-circuit photocurrent that is ca. 2 times and 2.9 times higher compared to top and uniform Pt distributions, respectively. This is attributed to better charge extraction in the nanowire center that mitigates losses due to charge recombination while optimizing light absorption within the SiNW, as revealed by three-dimensional electromagnetic simulations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Physics of Materials, University of Salzburg, Jakob Haringerstraße 2a, Salzburg A-5020, Austria
Institute of Particle Technology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstrasse 4, Erlangen 91058, Germany
Funding
??sterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften · Austrian Science Fund · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
2. Peter L. M. · 2016 · 1
3. 10.1039/C8CS00699G10.1039/C8CS00699G ↗
4. 10.1039/D4MH00020J10.1039/D4MH00020J ↗
5. 10.1039/D3EY00073G10.1039/D3EY00073G ↗
6. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0268310.1021/acsaem.1c02683 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl203564s10.1021/nl203564s ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20130381310.1002/anie.201303813 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11779810.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117798 ↗
10. 10.1021/ja108801m10.1021/ja108801m ↗
11. 10.1021/nl200201b10.1021/nl200201b ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.9b2146610.1021/acsami.9b21466 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0386210.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03862 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0190410.1021/acsanm.2c01904 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12633-023-02723-w10.1007/s12633-023-02723-w ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0023210.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00232 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0123510.1021/acsphotonics.7b01235 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41560-017-0068-x10.1038/s41560-017-0068-x ↗
19. 10.1039/C5EE00311C10.1039/C5EE00311C ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.111833810910.1073/pnas.1118338109 ↗
21. 10.1039/C1EE02518J10.1039/C1EE02518J ↗
22. 10.1126/science.111266610.1126/science.1112666 ↗
23. 10.1039/D3TC00957B10.1039/D3TC00957B ↗
24. 10.1038/nnano.2015.3310.1038/nnano.2015.33 ↗
25. 10.3390/molecules2708248510.3390/molecules27082485 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0360810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03608 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.0c1401310.1021/acsami.0c14013 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0359310.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03593 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10063610.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100636 ↗
30. 10.1021/nl202674t10.1021/nl202674t ↗
31. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-36110.1186/1556-276X-8-361 ↗
32. 10.1515/nanoph-2019-040910.1515/nanoph-2019-0409 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0198510.1021/acsomega.8b01985 ↗
34. 10.1039/D1NA00259G10.1039/D1NA00259G ↗
35. 10.1109/TAP.1966.113869310.1109/TAP.1966.1138693 ↗
36. Ansys Lumerical FDTD; 2024 https://www.ansys.com/products/optics/fdtd.