journal article·2024-10-09Open access

Fungal Attachment-Resistant Polymers for the Additive Manufacture of Medical Devices

Ling Xin Yong, Joseph Sefton, Cindy Vallières, Graham A. Rance, Jordan Hill, Valentina Cuzzucoli Crucitti, Adam A. Dundas, Felicity R. A. J. Rose, Morgan R. Alexander, Ricky Wildman, Yinfeng He, Simon V. Avery, Derek J. Irvine

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 40

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This study reports the development of the first copolymer material that (i) is resistant to fungal attachment and hence biofilm formation, (ii) operates via a nonkilling mechanism, i.e., avoids the use of antifungal actives and the emergence of fungal resistance, (iii) exhibits sufficient elasticity for use in flexible medical devices, and (iv) is suitable for 3D printing (3DP), enabling the production of safer, personalized medical devices. Candida albicans ( C. albicans ) can form biofilms on in-dwelling medical devices, leading to potentially fatal fungal infections in the human host. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) is a common material used for the manufacture of medical devices, such as voice prostheses, but it is prone to microbial attachment. Therefore, to deliver a fungal-resistant polymer with key physical properties similar to PDMS (e.g., flexibility), eight homopolymers and 30 subsequent copolymers with varying glass transition temperatures ( T g ) and fungal antiattachment properties were synthesized and their materials/processing properties studied. Of the copolymers produced, triethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate (TEGMA) copolymerized with (r)-α-acryloyloxy-β,β-dimethyl-γ-butyrolactone (AODMBA) at a 40:60 copolymer ratio was found to be the most promising candidate by meeting all of the above criteria. This included demonstrating the capability to successfully undergo 3DP by material jetting, via the printing of a voice prosthesis valve-flap using the selected copolymer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Additive Manufacturing, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

Nanoscale and Microscale Research Centre, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

Advanced Materials Research Group, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · University of Nottingham · Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.00610.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.006 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.00710.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.02210.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.022 ↗
4. 10.7759/cureus.4320410.7759/cureus.43204 ↗
5. 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.09.00510.1053/j.jvca.2017.09.005 ↗
6. 10.3390/jof304005710.3390/jof3040057 ↗
7. 10.1007/s12281-010-0040-810.1007/s12281-010-0040-8 ↗
8. 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-10433010.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104330 ↗
9. 10.1128/CMR.17.2.255-267.200410.1128/CMR.17.2.255-267.2004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.11.00210.1016/j.jiph.2021.11.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mib.2022.10223710.1016/j.mib.2022.102237 ↗
12. 10.3389/fphar.2022.89133610.3389/fphar.2022.891336 ↗
13. 10.1099/jmm.0.078717-010.1099/jmm.0.078717-0 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01424.x10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01424.x ↗
15. 10.3389/fmed.2018.0002810.3389/fmed.2018.00028 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41522-021-00238-z10.1038/s41522-021-00238-z ↗
17. 10.3390/molecules2617539510.3390/molecules26175395 ↗
18. 10.1055/s-2006-92529210.1055/s-2006-925292 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10096-007-0321-510.1007/s10096-007-0321-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17907-010.1016/S0140-6736(05)17907-0 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11046-010-9316-310.1007/s11046-010-9316-3 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.037 ↗
23. 10.1038/nbt.231610.1038/nbt.2316 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.aba657410.1126/sciadv.aba6574 ↗
25. 10.1039/D3GC01911J10.1039/D3GC01911J ↗
26. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10079210.1016/j.addma.2019.100792 ↗
27. 10.1128/EC.05005-1110.1128/EC.05005-11 ↗
28. 10.21769/BioProtoc.401610.21769/BioProtoc.4016 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.12031210.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120312 ↗
30. 10.1116/1.498401110.1116/1.4984011 ↗
31. Wen, M.; Ng, L. V.; Payne, J. A.; Francis, L. F.; Scriven, L. E.; Mccormick, A. V.Kinetic Study of Free-Radical Polymerization of Multifunctional Acrylates and Methacrylates. S&T's 50th Annual Conference, 1997, pp 564–569.
32. He, Y.; Begines, B.; Luckett, J.; Dubern, J.F.; Hook, A.; Prina, E.; Rose, F.; Tuck, C.; Hague, R.; Irvine, D.; Williams, P.; Alexander, M.; Wildman, R.Inkjet Based 3D Printing of Bespoke Medical Devices That Resist Bacterial Biofilm Formation, 2020. 10.1101/2020.06.30.180596.10.1101/2020.06.30.180596 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1504088010.3390/polym15040880 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.04.03010.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.04.030 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym1101000510.3390/polym11010005 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0061510.1021/acs.biomac.6b00615 ↗
37. Yarusso D. J. · 2002 · 499
38. 10.1557/PROC-625-11710.1557/PROC-625-117 ↗