journal article·2021-11-17Open access

Synthesis and Characterization of Lithium-Conducting Composite Polymer–Ceramic Membranes for Use in Nonaqueous Redox Flow Batteries

Yasser Ashraf Gandomi, Irina V. Krasnikova, Nikita O. Akhmetov, Nikolay A. Ovsyannikov, Mariam A. Pogosova, Nicholas J. Matteucci, Christopher T. Mallia, Bertrand J. Neyhouse, Alexis M. Fenton, Fikile R. Brushett, Keith J. Stevenson

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 45

Abstract

Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are a burgeoning electrochemical platform for long-duration energy storage, but present embodiments are too expensive for broad adoption. Nonaqueous redox flow batteries (NAqRFBs) seek to reduce system costs by leveraging the large electrochemical stability window of organic solvents (>3 V) to operate at high cell voltages and to facilitate the use of redox couples that are incompatible with aqueous electrolytes. However, a key challenge for emerging nonaqueous chemistries is the lack of membranes/separators with suitable combinations of selectivity, conductivity, and stability. Single-ion conducting ceramics, integrated into a flexible polymer matrix, may offer a pathway to attain performance attributes needed for enabling competitive nonaqueous systems. Here, we explore composite polymer-inorganic binder-filler membranes for lithium-based NAqRFBs, investigating two different ceramic compounds with NASICON-type (NASICON: sodium (Na) superionic conductor) crystal structure, Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP) and Li1.4Al0.4Ge0.2Ti1.4(PO4)3 (LAGTP), each blended with a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) polymeric matrix. We characterize the physicochemical and electrochemical properties of the synthesized membranes as a function of processing conditions and formulation using a range of microscopic and electrochemical techniques. Importantly, the electrochemical stability window of the as-prepared membranes lies between 2.2–4.5 V vs Li/Li+. We then integrate select composite membranes into a single electrolyte flow cell configuration and perform polarization measurements with different redox electrolyte compositions. We find that mechanically robust, chemically stable LATP/PVDF composites can support >40 mA cm–2 at 400 mV cell overpotential, but further improvements are needed in selectivity. Overall, the insights gained through this work begin to establish the foundational knowledge needed to advance composite polymer-inorganic membranes/separators for NAqRFBs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Center for Electrochemical Energy Storage, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russian Federation

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · Division of Graduate Education · Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · U.S. Department of Defense

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/2.0741712jes10.1149/2.0741712jes ↗
2. 10.1016/j.coche.2016.08.00210.1016/j.coche.2016.08.002 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10800-011-0348-210.1007/s10800-011-0348-2 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0477010.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04770 ↗
5. 10.1002/cssc.20170002810.1002/cssc.201700028 ↗
6. 10.1039/C4EE02158D10.1039/C4EE02158D ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22795810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227958 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22998310.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229983 ↗
9. 10.1002/cssc.20200063310.1002/cssc.202000633 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.08.00710.1016/j.coelec.2019.08.007 ↗
11. 10.3390/membranes202027510.3390/membranes2020275 ↗
12. 10.1002/cplu.20200061810.1002/cplu.202000618 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.06310.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.063 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.04310.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.043 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11424110.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114241 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.01510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.015 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.1511707jes10.1149/2.1511707jes ↗
18. 10.1149/2.0811412jes10.1149/2.0811412jes ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.10.00610.1016/j.ensm.2017.10.006 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.041 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.05810.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.058 ↗
22. 10.1039/C8RA08436J10.1039/C8RA08436J ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.08.01010.1016/j.ssi.2018.08.010 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20130065410.1002/aenm.201300654 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0441910.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04419 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0489910.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04899 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.06110.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.061 ↗
28. 10.3390/membranes702002910.3390/membranes7020029 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0611910jes10.1149/2.0611910jes ↗
30. 10.1149/2.0601805jes10.1149/2.0601805jes ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22736710.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227367 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.01.00310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.01.003 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00422-010.1016/S0167-2738(97)00422-0 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ssi.2003.10.02010.1016/j.ssi.2003.10.020 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15399110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153991 ↗
36. 10.1039/c3cp54358g10.1039/c3cp54358g ↗
37. 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00705-410.1016/S0009-2614(02)00705-4 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20140374610.1002/adma.201403746 ↗
39. 10.1149/1945-7111/abb34c10.1149/1945-7111/abb34c ↗
40. 10.1039/D1CP02006D10.1039/D1CP02006D ↗
41. 10.1149/1.283192110.1149/1.2831921 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.0141601jes10.1149/2.0141601jes ↗
43. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.08710.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.087 ↗