journal article·2020-09-23

Interface State Reduction by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Homogeneous Ternary Oxides

Steven A. Vitale, Weilin Hu, Richard D’Onofrio, Tony Soares, Michael W. Geis

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 38
Publisher page

Abstract

Homogeneous ternary oxides of silicon-, niobium-, and molybdenum-aluminate were deposited by plasma-enhanced ALD using sequential metal precursor pulses prior to the oxidation step, to reduce interfacial defects usually observed in nanolaminate growth. The growth kinetics can be understood in terms of competitive adsorption. Trimethyl aluminum (TMA) is strongly chemisorbed to the growth surface and does not permit coadsorption of any of the other precursors; when we lead with a TMA pulse, the resulting film is always Al2O3. When we lead with the Si or Nb precursors, the growth surface is partially saturated, but open sites are available for TMA coadsorption. The Mo precursor is weakly chemisorbed and is largely displaced by a subsequent TMA dose. As compared to nanolaminate films of the constituent binary oxides, the interface state density is reduced by up to a factor of 5.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, United States

Funding

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0287810.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02878 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0254-0584(98)00238-710.1016/S0254-0584(98)00238-7 ↗
3. 10.1002/1521-3862(200109)7:5<211::AID-CVDE211>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/1521-3862(200109)7:5<211::AID-CVDE211>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.10.15210.1016/j.tsf.2003.10.152 ↗
5. 10.1116/1.220965310.1116/1.2209653 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.351949710.1149/1.3519497 ↗
7. 10.1116/1.366409710.1116/1.3664097 ↗
8. 10.1021/am404498y10.1021/am404498y ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0165410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01654 ↗
10. 10.1116/1.492257710.1116/1.4922577 ↗
11. 10.1002/cvde.20150717010.1002/cvde.201507170 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0085310.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00853 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.04.03210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.04.032 ↗
14. 10.1002/cssc.20160045710.1002/cssc.201600457 ↗
15. 10.1039/C6TA04179E10.1039/C6TA04179E ↗
16. 10.1116/1.498713110.1116/1.4987131 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.497592810.1063/1.4975928 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.7b0498510.1021/acsami.7b04985 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.03.01410.1016/j.tsf.2015.03.014 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.166892510.1149/1.1668925 ↗
21. 10.1116/1.500271610.1116/1.5002716 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.196004110.1149/1.1960041 ↗
23. 10.1002/admi.20170091210.1002/admi.201700912 ↗
24. 10.1021/cm301658m10.1021/cm301658m ↗
25. 10.1002/sia.242210.1002/sia.2422 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.213624910.1149/1.2136249 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.04.06710.1016/j.matlet.2011.04.067 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.134310610.1149/1.1343106 ↗
29. 10.1002/sia.74018051010.1002/sia.740180510 ↗
30. 10.1109/LED.2010.204997810.1109/LED.2010.2049978 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10853-011-5918-510.1007/s10853-011-5918-5 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0380910.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03809 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.171198010.1063/1.1711980 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRev.161.90310.1103/PhysRev.161.903 ↗
35. 10.1016/0584-8539(76)80291-710.1016/0584-8539(76)80291-7 ↗
36. 10.1021/j100507a01110.1021/j100507a011 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mseb.2003.09.03610.1016/j.mseb.2003.09.036 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.35907210.1063/1.359072 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.11610.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.116 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00404-210.1016/S0013-4686(01)00404-2 ↗
41. 10.1109/16.77249210.1109/16.772492 ↗
42. Schroder D. K. · 2006