Microbial β-Glucuronidase Hydrogel Beads Activate Chemotherapeutic Prodrug
Source abstract
Abstract
Bacteria-assisted chemotherapeutics have been highlighted as an alternative or supplementary approach to treating cancer. However, dynamic cancer–microbe studies at the in vitro level have remained a challenge to show the impact and effectiveness of microbial therapeutics due to the lack of relevant coculture models. Here, we demonstrate a hydrogel-based compartmentalized system for prodrug activation of a natural ingredient of licorice root, glycyrrhizin, by microbial β-glucuronidase (GUS). Hydrogel containment with Lactococcus lactis provides a favorable niche to encode GUS enzymes with excellent permeability and can serve as an independent ecosystem in the transformation of pro-apoptotic materials. Based on the confinement system of GUS expressing microbes, we quantitatively evaluated chemotherapeutic effects enhanced by microbial GUS enzyme in two dynamic coculture models in vitro (i.e., 2D monolayered cancer cells and 3D tumor spheroids). Our findings support the processes of prodrug conversion mediated by bacterial GUS enzyme which can enhance the therapeutic efficacy of a chemotherapy drug under dynamic coculture conditions. We expect our in vitro coculture platforms can be used for the evaluation of pharmacological properties and biological activity of xenobiotics as well as the potential impact of microbes on cancer therapeutics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds · Cancer Research and Treatments · Biochemical and Molecular Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Bioengineering
University of Illinois at Urbana−Champaign
Cancer Center at Illinois
Carle-Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana−Champaign
Biomedical Research Center, Mills Breast Cancer Institute
Carle Foundation Hospital
School of Molecular and Cellular Biology
Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, Beckman Institute
Holonyak Micro and Nanotechnology Laboratory
Funding
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering · University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1128/MMBR.62.3.597-635.199810.1128/MMBR.62.3.597-635.1998 ↗
2. 10.1038/nrmicro319910.1038/nrmicro3199 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.01.00110.1016/j.tibtech.2005.01.001 ↗
4. 10.1002/jctb.199910.1002/jctb.1999 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aag277010.1126/science.aag2770 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.00054310.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.000543 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00394-017-1445-810.1007/s00394-017-1445-8 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.11456610.1016/j.bcp.2021.114566 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.02110.1016/j.mib.2014.11.021 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41392-022-01056-110.1038/s41392-022-01056-1 ↗
11. 10.1136/gut.32.4.43910.1136/gut.32.4.439 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.04.01110.1016/j.cbpa.2017.04.011 ↗
13. 10.1126/sciadv.aba354610.1126/sciadv.aba3546 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00221.x10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00221.x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.05.00510.1016/j.jconrel.2013.05.005 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.6b1550510.1021/acsami.6b15505 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.3c0098610.1021/acsami.3c00986 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.3c0121010.1021/acsami.3c01210 ↗
19. 10.1038/cgt.2008.1010.1038/cgt.2008.10 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.03010.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.030 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00253-012-4321-810.1007/s00253-012-4321-8 ↗
22. 10.1186/1423-0127-17-2110.1186/1423-0127-17-21 ↗
23. 10.1002/cam4.214810.1002/cam4.2148 ↗
24. 10.1038/nature0512710.1038/nature05127 ↗
25. 10.1098/rsif.2014.006510.1098/rsif.2014.0065 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.11915910.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119159 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-020-62139-z10.1038/s41598-020-62139-z ↗
28. 10.1073/pnas.040842210210.1073/pnas.0408422102 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.0c1316910.1021/acsami.0c13169 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.2c0149310.1021/acsami.2c01493 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41598-018-24748-710.1038/s41598-018-24748-7 ↗
32. 10.1039/B911367C10.1039/B911367C ↗
33. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.11480910.1016/j.bios.2022.114809 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.01.00310.1016/j.actbio.2023.01.003 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0167810.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01678 ↗
36. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00520.x10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00520.x ↗
37. 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.07.00110.1016/j.drudis.2022.07.001 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13615-X10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13615-X ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.13167210.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131672 ↗
40. 10.1385/0-89603-321-X:12510.1385/0-89603-321-X:125 ↗
41. 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90445-210.1016/0022-2836(73)90445-2 ↗
42. 10.1002/mabi.20060006910.1002/mabi.200600069 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003 ↗
44. 10.1002/rcm.669610.1002/rcm.6696 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.10.02610.1016/j.jchromb.2004.10.026 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41598-018-34678-z10.1038/s41598-018-34678-z ↗
47. 10.1016/j.procbio.2012.12.00810.1016/j.procbio.2012.12.008 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.06.00210.1016/j.yrtph.2006.06.002 ↗
49. 10.1207/S15327914nc391_110.1207/S15327914nc391_1 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.12310.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.123 ↗
51. 10.1080/1091581070135122810.1080/10915810701351228 ↗
52. 10.1128/AEM.00755-1810.1128/AEM.00755-18 ↗
53. Satomi Y. · Anticancer Res. · 2005 · 25 · 4043
54. 10.1186/s12934-015-0383-510.1186/s12934-015-0383-5 ↗
55. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.89869910.3389/fbioe.2022.898699 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.11.00210.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.11.002 ↗
57. 10.1242/jcs.18810210.1242/jcs.188102 ↗
58. 10.1007/s12253-016-0066-510.1007/s12253-016-0066-5 ↗
59. 10.1039/D2CC01187E10.1039/D2CC01187E ↗