Anion-Exchange Electrospun Mixed-Matrix Polymer Fibers of Colesevelam for Water Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
Novel anion-exchange electrospun fiber membranes of polycaprolactone doped with the cationic, cross-linked colesevelam polymer are reported. The weight fraction of cross-linked cationic colesevelam polymer, as the active phase within the PCL matrix, can readily be controlled in the synthesis of the mixed-matrix fibers (Cole@PCL), enabling optimization of the ion-exchange properties of the resulted membranes. This approach enabled adaptation of anion-exchange resins to a permeable, flexible membrane form, which is a significant advancement toward futuristic water treatment applications, demonstrated herein for the removal of trace contaminants, including nitrates and phosphates, as well as anionic dyes. The Cole@PCL membranes demonstrated the dependence of contaminant uptake on the weight percentage of colesevelam in the mixed-matrix membrane. An optimal 10 wt % of colesevelam was identified, demonstrating a staggering ion removal capacity of 155.8 mg/g for nitrate, 177.6 mg/g for phosphate, and 70 mg/g for Methyl Orange.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Materials Science, Zewail City of Science and Technology, 6th of October, 12578 Giza, Egypt
Environmental Engineering Program, Zewail City of Science and Technology, 6th of October, 12578 Giza, Egypt
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science
Cairo University
Department of Chemical Engineering
Military Technical College
Faculty of Engineering Mataria
Helwan University
Center for Certified Standards, Zewail City of Science and Technology, 6th of October, 12578 Giza, Egypt
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Strathmann H. · 2004 · 9 · 89
2. 10.1007/s10620-005-2765-810.1007/s10620-005-2765-8 ↗
3. 10.4137/CMED.S1259010.4137/CMED.S12590 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41428-020-0308-y10.1038/s41428-020-0308-y ↗
5. 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00658-910.1016/S0032-3861(01)00658-9 ↗
6. 10.1663/0006-8101(2005)071[0449:EAEV]2.0.CO;210.1663/0006-8101(2005)071[0449:EAEV]2.0.CO;2 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.12.00210.1016/j.jwpe.2015.12.002 ↗
8. 10.1080/19443994.2013.79884210.1080/19443994.2013.798842 ↗
9. 10.1155/2019/952961810.1155/2019/9529618 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.01510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.015 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.01310.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.013 ↗
12. 10.1111/wej.1250310.1111/wej.12503 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.01510.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.015 ↗
14. Meftah T. · Int. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 12 · 223
15. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.03.04910.1016/j.micromeso.2019.03.049 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11536710.1016/j.molliq.2021.115367 ↗
17. 10.1021/ie051076c10.1021/ie051076c ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12173410.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121734 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11176610.1016/j.molliq.2019.111766 ↗
20. 10.3390/nano1002033610.3390/nano10020336 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8CP07168C10.1039/C8CP07168C ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.00310.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.00310.1016/j.cej.2018.08.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.04510.1016/j.watres.2019.03.045 ↗
25. 10.1089/ees.2019.049010.1089/ees.2019.0490 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2022.10532810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2022.105328 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jssc.2021.12270910.1016/j.jssc.2021.122709 ↗
28. 10.1006/jcis.2001.777310.1006/jcis.2001.7773 ↗