journal article·2022-07-27Open access

Surface Passivation and Detrimental Heat-Induced Diffusion Effects in RbF-Treated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cell Absorbers

Amala Elizabeth, Sudhir K. Sahoo, Himanshu Phirke, Tim Kodalle, Thomas D. Kühne, Jean-Nicolas Audinot, Tom Wirtz, Alex Redinger, Christian A. Kaufmann, Hossein Mirhosseini, Harry Mönig

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 29

Abstract

Alkali postdeposition treatments of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorbers with KF, RbF, and CsF have led to remarkable efficiency improvements for chalcopyrite thin film solar cells. However, the effect of such treatments on the electronic properties and defect physics of the chalcopyrite absorber surfaces are not yet fully understood. In this work, we use scanning tunneling spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to compare the surface defect electronic properties and chemical composition of RbF-treated and nontreated absorbers. We find that the RbF treatment is effective in passivating electronic defect levels at the surface by preventing surface oxidation. Our X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data points to the presence of chemisorbed Rb on the surface with a bonding configuration similar to that of a RbInSe2 bulk compound. Yet, a quantitative analysis indicates Rb coverage in the submonolayer regime, which is likely causing the surface passivation. Furthermore, ab initio calculations confirm that RbF-treated surfaces are less prone to oxidation (in the form of Ga, In, and Se oxides) than bare chalcopyrite surfaces. In addition, elemental diffusion of Rb along with Na, Cu, and Ga is found to occur when the samples are annealed under ultrahigh vacuum conditions. Magnetic sector secondary ion mass spectrometry measurements indicate that there is a homogeneous spatial distribution of Rb on the surface both before and after annealing, albeit with an increased concentration at the surface after heat treatment. Depth-resolved magnetic sector secondary ion mass spectrometry measurements show that Rb diffusion within the bulk occurs predominantly along grain boundaries. Scanning tunneling and XPS measurements after subsequent annealing steps demonstrate that the Rb accumulation at the surface leads to the formation of metallic Rb phases, involving a significant increase of electronic defect levels and/or surface dipole formation. These results strongly suggest a deterioration of the absorber–window interface because of increased recombination losses after the heat-induced diffusion of Rb toward the interface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physikalisches Institut, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Wilhelm-Klemm-Strasse 10, Münster 48149, Germany

Center for Nanotechnology (CeNTech), Heisenbergstrasse 11, Münster 48149, Germany

Dynamics of Condensed Matter and Center for Sustainable Systems Design, University of Paderborn, Warburger Strasse 100, Paderborn D-33098, Germany

Department of Physics and Materials Science, Université du Luxembourg, 162 A, avenue de la Faïencerie, Luxembourg City L-1511 Luxembourg

PVcomB/Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Schwarzschildstrasse 3, Berlin 12489, Germany

Advanced Instrumentation for Nano-Analytics (AINA), Materials Research and Technology Department (MRT), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux L-4362, Luxembourg

Funding

Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Bundesministerium f?r Wirtschaft und Energie

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat378910.1038/nmat3789 ↗
2. 10.1002/pssr.20160019910.1002/pssr.201600199 ↗
3. 10.1002/pip.107810.1002/pip.1078 ↗
4. 10.1002/pssr.20140952010.1002/pssr.201409520 ↗
5. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.293721810.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2937218 ↗
6. Contreras M. A. · Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. · 1997 · 359
7. Granata J. · Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. · 1997 · 387
8. Keyes B. M. · Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. · 1997 · 479
9. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.03810.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.038 ↗
10. Handick E. · IEEE PVSC · 2016 · 2
11. Friedlmeier T. M. · IEEE 43rd Photovolt. Spec. Conf. PVSC · 2016 · 0457
12. 10.1039/c4cp00614c10.1039/c4cp00614c ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.5b0923110.1021/acsami.5b09231 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.02310.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.023 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20190375210.1002/aenm.201903752 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.487145710.1063/1.4871457 ↗
17. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2011.217044710.1109/JPHOTOV.2011.2170447 ↗
18. 10.1016/0927-0248(94)90132-510.1016/0927-0248(94)90132-5 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.58542110.1116/1.585421 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.07660310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.076603 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.04540510.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.045405 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.06340110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.063401 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.02810.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.028 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.5b0326010.1021/acsami.5b03260 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.490397610.1063/1.4903976 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0058410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00584 ↗
27. 10.1002/solr.20180015610.1002/solr.201800156 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0927-0248(97)00124-410.1016/S0927-0248(97)00124-4 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.182000010.1063/1.1820000 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.09.02610.1016/j.tsf.2018.09.026 ↗
31. 10.1002/solr.20220004410.1002/solr.202200044 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.8b1604010.1021/acsami.8b16040 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11107110.1016/j.solmat.2021.111071 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.02910.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.029 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0341210.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03412 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.504424410.1063/1.5044244 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.0c0879410.1021/acsami.0c08794 ↗
38. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199801)10:1<31::AID-ADMA31>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199801)10:1<31::AID-ADMA31>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
39. 10.1016/0927-0248(95)00105-010.1016/0927-0248(95)00105-0 ↗
40. 10.1002/pip.338010.1002/pip.3380 ↗
41. 10.1143/JJAP.51.10NC2210.1143/JJAP.51.10NC22 ↗
42. 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-11545710.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-115457 ↗
43. 10.1088/1361-6633/ac1e3210.1088/1361-6633/ac1e32 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.502080510.1063/1.5020805 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.504462910.1063/1.5044629 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41598-019-39283-210.1038/s41598-019-39283-2 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.04910.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.049 ↗
48. 10.1051/epjpv/202000510.1051/epjpv/2020005 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0162210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01622 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.02810.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.028 ↗
51. 10.1002/pssa.20143138810.1002/pssa.201431388 ↗
52. 10.1002/pip.118510.1002/pip.1185 ↗
53. Contreras M. A. · Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. · 1994 · 1 · 68
54. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.292941810.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2929418 ↗
55. 10.1002/sia.220210.1002/sia.2202 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
57. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗