Interparticle Forces of a Native and Encapsulated Metal-Organic Framework and Their Effects on Colloidal Dispersion
Source abstract
Abstract
The colloidal properties of suspended metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are critical for device fabrication and application. Herein, van der Waals attractive, electric double layer repulsive, and steric repulsive forces of a native and encapsulated MOF are quantified for the first time. The van der Waals attractive forces were investigated by conducting environmental ellipsometric porosimetry (EEP) and spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) on submicron, optical-quality nanoparticle films. The repulsive forces were determined from colloid and material characterization measurements. These data were used to predict suspension properties via extended Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, and Overbeek theory. The state of dispersion was quantified for comparison with theoretical predictions for nine solvents. The MOF encapsulated with a surface-selective modification showed superior suspension in hydrophobic solvents. These findings should expedite the formulation of MOF colloidal suspensions for future works.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Barrer Centre, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, U.K.
Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
Funding
Marshall Aid Commemoration Commission · Environmental Protection Agency
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20170430310.1002/adma.201704303 ↗
3. 10.1039/C9CS00806C10.1039/C9CS00806C ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0262510.1021/acsenergylett.9b02625 ↗
5. Yaghi O. M. · 201910.1002/9783527821099 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21354410.1016/j.ccr.2020.213544 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat260810.1038/nmat2608 ↗
8. 10.1039/b807080f10.1039/b807080f ↗
9. 10.1039/C7CS00153C10.1039/C7CS00153C ↗
10. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.01210.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.012 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7CS00122C10.1039/C7CS00122C ↗
12. 10.1039/C6CS00930A10.1039/C6CS00930A ↗
13. 10.1002/ange.20150688810.1002/ange.201506888 ↗
14. 10.1038/nchem.127210.1038/nchem.1272 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20110913210.1002/anie.201109132 ↗
16. 10.1002/ange.20170674510.1002/ange.201706745 ↗
17. 10.1039/b915011k10.1039/b915011k ↗
18. 10.1126/science.111627510.1126/science.1116275 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.09810.1016/j.cej.2010.11.098 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja407665w10.1021/ja407665w ↗
21. 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
22. Hunter, R. J. Zeta Potential in Colloid Science - Principles and Applications; Academic Press, 1981; pp 59–124.10.1016/B978-0-12-361961-7.50007-9 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.172419610.1063/1.1724196 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.174446610.1063/1.1744466 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.173271010.1063/1.1732710 ↗
26. 10.1016/0021-9797(73)90040-410.1016/0021-9797(73)90040-4 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.7b1829910.1021/acsami.7b18299 ↗
28. 10.1021/la050981z10.1021/la050981z ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.9b1789910.1021/acsami.9b17899 ↗
30. 10.1351/pac19825411220110.1351/pac198254112201 ↗
31. 10.1021/la702838810.1021/la7028388 ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.1c0439610.1021/jacs.1c04396 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0001-8686(97)00003-110.1016/S0001-8686(97)00003-1 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRev.68.510.1103/PhysRev.68.5 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0153010.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01530 ↗
36. Cataldo F. · Eur. Chem. Bull. · 2015 · 4 · 92
37. 10.1023/A:101514671050010.1023/A:1015146710500 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)80090-010.1016/S0020-1693(00)80090-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/0039-6028(85)90412-110.1016/0039-6028(85)90412-1 ↗