High-Performance, Free-Standing Symmetric Hybrid Membranes for Osmotic Separation
Source abstract
Abstract
The internal concentration polarization (ICP) of asymmetric osmotic membranes with support layers greatly reduced membrane water permeability, therefore compromising membrane performance. In this study, a series of free-standing symmetric hybrid forward osmosis (FO) membranes without experiencing ICP were fabricated by covalently linking metal–organic framework (MOF) nanofillers with a polymer matrix. Owing to the introduction of MOFs, which allow only water permeation but reject salts by steric hindrance, the prepared hybrid membranes could approach the empirical permeability-selectivity trade-off. The optimized hybrid membrane displayed an outstanding water/Na2SO4 selectivity of ∼1208.4 L mol–1, compared with that of conventional membranes of ∼375.6 L mol–1. Additionally, the fabricated hybrid membranes showed excellent mechanical robustness, maintaining structural integrity during the long-term FO separation of high-salinity solution. This work provides an effective methodology to fabricate high-performance, symmetric MOF-based membranes for osmotic separation processes such as seawater desalination and water purification.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Graphene research and applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Environment, Research Centre for Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Water Quality Protection, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8286, United States
Funding
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.desal.2012.01.02110.1016/j.desal.2012.01.021 ↗
2. 10.2166/wst.2018.03110.2166/wst.2018.031 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.01310.1016/j.desal.2010.10.013 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.05410.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.054 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0526510.1021/acs.est.7b05265 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.04810.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.04810.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.048 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.02710.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.027 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.00310.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.003 ↗
10. 10.1039/C6AN00194G10.1039/C6AN00194G ↗
11. 10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.00510.1016/j.desal.2016.10.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11814510.1016/j.memsci.2020.118145 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.05210.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.052 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.00310.1016/j.desal.2006.02.003 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0592510.1021/acs.est.8b05925 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0221410.1021/acs.est.9b02214 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.03810.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.038 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11793110.1016/j.memsci.2020.117931 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.desal.2018.08.00510.1016/j.desal.2018.08.005 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.8b1568410.1021/acsami.8b15684 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.02.00810.1016/j.apmt.2018.02.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.04510.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.045 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.04910.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.049 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.03810.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.038 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0399410.1021/acsnano.8b03994 ↗
26. 10.1039/C8SC05450A10.1039/C8SC05450A ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ces.2011.06.05110.1016/j.ces.2011.06.051 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja805795310.1021/ja8057953 ↗
29. Fu Y. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. · 2012 · 124 · 342010.1002/ange.201108357 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.01410.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.014 ↗
31. 10.1021/j150579a01110.1021/j150579a011 ↗
32. 10.1002/app.1970.07014012110.1002/app.1970.070140121 ↗
33. Tiraferri A. · Riv Neurol. · 2013 · 444 · 523
34. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83313-X10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83313-X ↗
35. 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00354-710.1016/S0376-7388(96)00354-7 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11051-013-2014-610.1007/s11051-013-2014-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.01210.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.012 ↗
38. 10.1039/c2ra20641b10.1039/c2ra20641b ↗
39. 10.1007/s10965-016-0981-x10.1007/s10965-016-0981-x ↗
40. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00458-410.1016/S0032-3861(00)00458-4 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.09.02110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.09.021 ↗
42. 10.1039/C4PY01293C10.1039/C4PY01293C ↗
43. 10.1006/jcht.2000.081510.1006/jcht.2000.0815 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0021-9614(02)00315-410.1016/S0021-9614(02)00315-4 ↗
45. Werber J. R. · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2016 · 18 · 1601810.1038/natrevmats.2016.18 ↗
46. 10.1126/science.aab053010.1126/science.aab0530 ↗
47. 10.1002/adma.20180240110.1002/adma.201802401 ↗
48. 10.1021/es100901n10.1021/es100901n ↗
49. 10.1021/es901132x10.1021/es901132x ↗
50. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.03410.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.034 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20150623710.1002/adma.201506237 ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20170597310.1002/adma.201705973 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.03310.1016/j.ces.2012.05.033 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b0011710.1021/acs.estlett.8b00117 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b0036410.1021/acs.estlett.9b00364 ↗
56. 10.1021/es100255510.1021/es1002555 ↗
57. 10.1021/ma011009410.1021/ma0110094 ↗
58. 10.1007/s40242-019-8401-510.1007/s40242-019-8401-5 ↗
59. 10.1021/ja010720l10.1021/ja010720l ↗
60. 10.1021/ma800819s10.1021/ma800819s ↗