journal article·2018-08-22

Using Unentangled Oligomers To Toughen Materials

Scott G. Isaacson, Yusuke Matsuda, Krystelle Lionti, Theo Frot, Willi Volksen, Reinhold H. Dauskardt, Geraud Dubois

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 33
Publisher page

Abstract

Entanglements between polymer chains are responsible for the strength and toughness of polymeric materials. When the chains are too short to form entanglements, the polymer becomes weak and brittle. Here we show that molecular bridging of oligomers in molecular-scale confinement can dramatically toughen materials even when intermolecular entanglements are completely absent. We describe the fabrication of nanocomposite materials that confine oligomer chains to molecular-scale dimensions and demonstrate that partially confined unentangled oligomers can toughen materials far beyond rule-of-mixtures estimates. We also characterize how partially confined oligomers affect the kinetics of nanocomposite cracking in moist environments and show that the presence of a backfilled oligomeric phase within a nanoporous organosilicate matrix leads to atomistic crack path meandering in which the failure path is preferentially located within the matrix phase.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 496 Lomita Mall, Stanford, California 94305, United States

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat187010.1038/nmat1870 ↗
2. 10.1051/epjconf/2015830200910.1051/epjconf/20158302009 ↗
3. 10.1002/macp.20170044810.1002/macp.201700448 ↗
4. 10.1021/cm960127g10.1021/cm960127g ↗
5. 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/04610.1088/1367-2630/6/1/046 ↗
6. 10.1140/epje/i2003-10036-410.1140/epje/i2003-10036-4 ↗
7. De Gennes P.-G. · 1979
8. 10.1126/science.115794510.1126/science.1157945 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.12780110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.127801 ↗
10. Kramer E. · 1983 · 1
11. 10.1038/nmat447510.1038/nmat4475 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0372510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03725 ↗
13. Robertson R. E. · 1976 · 8910.1021/ba-1976-0154.ch007 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.359108110.1149/1.3591081 ↗
15. 10.1149/2.013205jss10.1149/2.013205jss ↗
16. 10.1021/cr900281910.1021/cr9002819 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.02510.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.025 ↗
18. 10.1149/2.0081501jss10.1149/2.0081501jss ↗
19. 10.1021/j150510a02510.1021/j150510a025 ↗
20. 10.1002/pol.1982.18020051210.1002/pol.1982.180200512 ↗
21. 10.1021/ma00059a01210.1021/ma00059a012 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat115310.1038/nmat1153 ↗
23. 10.1002/admi.20170024010.1002/admi.201700240 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03097.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03097.x ↗
25. 10.1021/am300312y10.1021/am300312y ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.01410.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.014 ↗
27. 10.1557/jmr.2006.010610.1557/jmr.2006.0106 ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0055292610.1007/BF00552926 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.08.11610.1016/j.tsf.2010.08.116 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0054082310.1007/BF00540823 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.479221210.1063/1.4792212 ↗
32. 10.1179/msc.1980.14.8-9.45010.1179/msc.1980.14.8-9.450 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20070119310.1002/adma.200701193 ↗