Insect Antiadhesive Surfaces Using Electrosprayed Wrinkled Ethyl Cellulose Particles
Source abstract
Abstract
A range of plants developed leaves, the surfaces of which prevent or diminish insect adhesion due to their microscopic topography. Well known examples include the leaves of the lychee tree (Litchi chinensis). Here, we report a method to coat substrates with ethyl cellulose microparticles that exhibit wrinkled surfaces, resulting in surface morphologies that closely resemble those of insect repelling plants, i.e., Litchi chinensis. The microparticles were prepared by electrospraying, a method that allowed tuning of the particle size and surface morphology. By measuring the traction forces of Colorado potato beetles walking on these surfaces, the wrinkly microsphere parameters were optimized, resulting in biomimetic surfaces that surpass the antiadhesive properties of the biological role model. This study may pave the way to sustainable, nontoxic insecticide replacements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Adolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Karlsruhe Institute for Technology, Fritz-Haber-Weg 6, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Funding
European Commission · Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F?rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · Karlsruher Institut f?r Technologie · Adolphe Merkle Foundation
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1360-1385(96)90007-210.1016/S1360-1385(96)90007-2 ↗
2. Gorb S. · 2001
3. 10.1002/adma.20170532210.1002/adma.201705322 ↗
4. 10.1098/rsif.2011.020210.1098/rsif.2011.0202 ↗
5. 10.1002/admi.20200012910.1002/admi.202000129 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.06.01010.1016/j.ejpb.2017.06.010 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apt.2010.09.01110.1016/j.apt.2010.09.011 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.10.00210.1016/j.jcis.2009.10.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.01.03510.1016/j.powtec.2007.01.035 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.04.01210.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.04.012 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.03.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.03.002 ↗
12. Kennedy J. F. · 199510.1533/9781845698539 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijpx.2019.10002310.1016/j.ijpx.2019.100023 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11095-012-0865-710.1007/s11095-012-0865-7 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jff.2015.02.03610.1016/j.jff.2015.02.036 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.3010710.1002/app.30107 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.02110.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.021 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.03710.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.037 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.07.00310.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.07.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00088-510.1016/S0021-8502(02)00088-5 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10544-011-9583-x10.1007/s10544-011-9583-x ↗
22. 10.1049/iet-nbt.2018.004410.1049/iet-nbt.2018.0044 ↗
23. 10.1002/macp.20080039610.1002/macp.200800396 ↗
24. 10.1002/jbm.b.3129610.1002/jbm.b.31296 ↗
25. 10.1163/15685620878408961610.1163/156856208784089616 ↗
26. Smallwood I. · 2012
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.11610.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.116 ↗
28. 10.1021/es502907410.1021/es5029074 ↗
29. Geerse, K. B.; Marijnissen, J. C. Optimization of Aerosol Drug Delivery; Springer, 2003; pp 75–90.10.1007/978-94-017-0267-6_4 ↗
30. 10.1080/0278682970896547910.1080/02786829708965479 ↗
31. 10.1017/S002211209400347210.1017/S0022112094003472 ↗
32. 10.1021/ed075p112510.1021/ed075p1125 ↗
33. 10.1002/app.3049810.1002/app.30498 ↗
34. 10.1242/jeb.03823210.1242/jeb.038232 ↗
35. 10.1098/rsif.2017.013410.1098/rsif.2017.0134 ↗
36. 10.3762/bjnano.3.710.3762/bjnano.3.7 ↗
37. 10.1098/rsos.20131910.1098/rsos.201319 ↗
38. 10.3762/bjnano.7.13910.3762/bjnano.7.139 ↗
39. 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01369.x10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01369.x ↗
40. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗